Cargando…
Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Obese Patients: Utility of a New Equation
There is no consensus on the best equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in obese patients (OP). Objective: to evaluate the performance of the current equations and the new Argentinian Equation (“AE”) to estimate GFR in OP. Two validation samples were used: internal (IVS, using 10-fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904233 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15051233 |
_version_ | 1784904939278958592 |
---|---|
author | Fernández, Pehuén Nores, María Laura Douthat, Walter de Arteaga, Javier Luján, Pablo Campazzo, Mario de La Fuente, Jorge Chiurchiu, Carlos |
author_facet | Fernández, Pehuén Nores, María Laura Douthat, Walter de Arteaga, Javier Luján, Pablo Campazzo, Mario de La Fuente, Jorge Chiurchiu, Carlos |
author_sort | Fernández, Pehuén |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is no consensus on the best equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in obese patients (OP). Objective: to evaluate the performance of the current equations and the new Argentinian Equation (“AE”) to estimate GFR in OP. Two validation samples were used: internal (IVS, using 10-fold cross-validation) and temporary (TVS). OP whose GFR was measured (mGFR) with clearance of iothalamate between 2007/2017 (IVS, n = 189) and 2018/2019 (TVS, n = 26) were included. To evaluate the performance of the equations we used: bias (difference between eGFR and mGFR), P30 (percentage of estimates within ±30% of mGFR), Pearson’s correlation (r) and percentage of correct classification (%CC) according to the stages of CKD. The median age was 50 years. Sixty percent had grade I obesity (G1-Ob), 25.1% G2-Ob and 14.9% G3-Ob, with a wide range in mGFR (5.6–173.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). In the IVS, AE obtained a higher P30 (85.2%), r (0.86) and %CC (74.4%), with lower bias (−0.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). In the TVS, AE obtained a higher P30 (88.5%), r (0.89) and %CC (84.6%). The performance of all equations was reduced in G3-Ob, but AE was the only one that obtained a P30 > 80% in all degrees. AE obtained better overall performance to estimate GFR in OP and could be useful in this population. Conclusions from this study may not be generalizable to all populations of obese patients since they were derived from a study in a single center with a very specific ethnic mixed population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10004854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100048542023-03-11 Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Obese Patients: Utility of a New Equation Fernández, Pehuén Nores, María Laura Douthat, Walter de Arteaga, Javier Luján, Pablo Campazzo, Mario de La Fuente, Jorge Chiurchiu, Carlos Nutrients Article There is no consensus on the best equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in obese patients (OP). Objective: to evaluate the performance of the current equations and the new Argentinian Equation (“AE”) to estimate GFR in OP. Two validation samples were used: internal (IVS, using 10-fold cross-validation) and temporary (TVS). OP whose GFR was measured (mGFR) with clearance of iothalamate between 2007/2017 (IVS, n = 189) and 2018/2019 (TVS, n = 26) were included. To evaluate the performance of the equations we used: bias (difference between eGFR and mGFR), P30 (percentage of estimates within ±30% of mGFR), Pearson’s correlation (r) and percentage of correct classification (%CC) according to the stages of CKD. The median age was 50 years. Sixty percent had grade I obesity (G1-Ob), 25.1% G2-Ob and 14.9% G3-Ob, with a wide range in mGFR (5.6–173.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). In the IVS, AE obtained a higher P30 (85.2%), r (0.86) and %CC (74.4%), with lower bias (−0.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). In the TVS, AE obtained a higher P30 (88.5%), r (0.89) and %CC (84.6%). The performance of all equations was reduced in G3-Ob, but AE was the only one that obtained a P30 > 80% in all degrees. AE obtained better overall performance to estimate GFR in OP and could be useful in this population. Conclusions from this study may not be generalizable to all populations of obese patients since they were derived from a study in a single center with a very specific ethnic mixed population. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10004854/ /pubmed/36904233 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15051233 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fernández, Pehuén Nores, María Laura Douthat, Walter de Arteaga, Javier Luján, Pablo Campazzo, Mario de La Fuente, Jorge Chiurchiu, Carlos Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Obese Patients: Utility of a New Equation |
title | Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Obese Patients: Utility of a New Equation |
title_full | Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Obese Patients: Utility of a New Equation |
title_fullStr | Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Obese Patients: Utility of a New Equation |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Obese Patients: Utility of a New Equation |
title_short | Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Obese Patients: Utility of a New Equation |
title_sort | estimation of glomerular filtration rate in obese patients: utility of a new equation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904233 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15051233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezpehuen estimationofglomerularfiltrationrateinobesepatientsutilityofanewequation AT noresmarialaura estimationofglomerularfiltrationrateinobesepatientsutilityofanewequation AT douthatwalter estimationofglomerularfiltrationrateinobesepatientsutilityofanewequation AT dearteagajavier estimationofglomerularfiltrationrateinobesepatientsutilityofanewequation AT lujanpablo estimationofglomerularfiltrationrateinobesepatientsutilityofanewequation AT campazzomario estimationofglomerularfiltrationrateinobesepatientsutilityofanewequation AT delafuentejorge estimationofglomerularfiltrationrateinobesepatientsutilityofanewequation AT chiurchiucarlos estimationofglomerularfiltrationrateinobesepatientsutilityofanewequation |