Cargando…
Transgene Bioconfinement: Don’t Flow There
The adoption of genetically engineered (GE) crops has led to economic and environmental benefits. However, there are regulatory and environmental concerns regarding the potential movement of transgenes beyond cultivation. These concerns are greater for GE crops with high outcrossing frequencies to s...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051099 |
_version_ | 1784905038279213056 |
---|---|
author | Stockdale, Jessica N. Millwood, Reginald J. |
author_facet | Stockdale, Jessica N. Millwood, Reginald J. |
author_sort | Stockdale, Jessica N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The adoption of genetically engineered (GE) crops has led to economic and environmental benefits. However, there are regulatory and environmental concerns regarding the potential movement of transgenes beyond cultivation. These concerns are greater for GE crops with high outcrossing frequencies to sexually compatible wild relatives and those grown in their native region. Newer GE crops may also confer traits that enhance fitness, and introgression of these traits could negatively impact natural populations. Transgene flow could be lessened or prevented altogether through the addition of a bioconfinement system during transgenic plant production. Several bioconfinement approaches have been designed and tested and a few show promise for transgene flow prevention. However, no system has been widely adopted despite nearly three decades of GE crop cultivation. Nonetheless, it may be necessary to implement a bioconfinement system in new GE crops or in those where the potential of transgene flow is high. Here, we survey such systems that focus on male and seed sterility, transgene excision, delayed flowering, as well as the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 to reduce or eliminate transgene flow. We discuss system utility and efficacy, as well as necessary features for commercial adoption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10005267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100052672023-03-11 Transgene Bioconfinement: Don’t Flow There Stockdale, Jessica N. Millwood, Reginald J. Plants (Basel) Review The adoption of genetically engineered (GE) crops has led to economic and environmental benefits. However, there are regulatory and environmental concerns regarding the potential movement of transgenes beyond cultivation. These concerns are greater for GE crops with high outcrossing frequencies to sexually compatible wild relatives and those grown in their native region. Newer GE crops may also confer traits that enhance fitness, and introgression of these traits could negatively impact natural populations. Transgene flow could be lessened or prevented altogether through the addition of a bioconfinement system during transgenic plant production. Several bioconfinement approaches have been designed and tested and a few show promise for transgene flow prevention. However, no system has been widely adopted despite nearly three decades of GE crop cultivation. Nonetheless, it may be necessary to implement a bioconfinement system in new GE crops or in those where the potential of transgene flow is high. Here, we survey such systems that focus on male and seed sterility, transgene excision, delayed flowering, as well as the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 to reduce or eliminate transgene flow. We discuss system utility and efficacy, as well as necessary features for commercial adoption. MDPI 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10005267/ /pubmed/36903958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051099 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Stockdale, Jessica N. Millwood, Reginald J. Transgene Bioconfinement: Don’t Flow There |
title | Transgene Bioconfinement: Don’t Flow There |
title_full | Transgene Bioconfinement: Don’t Flow There |
title_fullStr | Transgene Bioconfinement: Don’t Flow There |
title_full_unstemmed | Transgene Bioconfinement: Don’t Flow There |
title_short | Transgene Bioconfinement: Don’t Flow There |
title_sort | transgene bioconfinement: don’t flow there |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stockdalejessican transgenebioconfinementdontflowthere AT millwoodreginaldj transgenebioconfinementdontflowthere |