Cargando…

Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis

Photosynthetic efficiency under both steady-state and fluctuating light can significantly affect plant growth under naturally fluctuating light conditions. However, the difference in photosynthetic performance between different rose genotypes is little known. This study compared the photosynthetic p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiao-Qian, Zeng, Zhi-Lan, Shi, Zi-Ming, Wang, Ji-Hua, Huang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051186
_version_ 1784905074224398336
author Wang, Xiao-Qian
Zeng, Zhi-Lan
Shi, Zi-Ming
Wang, Ji-Hua
Huang, Wei
author_facet Wang, Xiao-Qian
Zeng, Zhi-Lan
Shi, Zi-Ming
Wang, Ji-Hua
Huang, Wei
author_sort Wang, Xiao-Qian
collection PubMed
description Photosynthetic efficiency under both steady-state and fluctuating light can significantly affect plant growth under naturally fluctuating light conditions. However, the difference in photosynthetic performance between different rose genotypes is little known. This study compared the photosynthetic performance under steady-state and fluctuating light in two modern rose cultivars (Rose hybrida), “Orange Reeva” and “Gelato”, and an old Chinese rose plant Rosa chinensis cultivar, “Slater’s crimson China”. The light and CO(2) response curves indicated that they showed similar photosynthetic capacity under steady state. The light-saturated steady-state photosynthesis in these three rose genotypes was mainly limited by biochemistry (60%) rather than diffusional conductance. Under fluctuating light conditions (alternated between 100 and 1500 μmol photons m(−2) m(−1) every 5 min), stomatal conductance gradually decreased in these three rose genotypes, while mesophyll conductance (g(m)) was maintained stable in Orange Reeva and Gelato but decreased by 23% in R. chinensis, resulting in a stronger loss of CO(2) assimilation under high-light phases in R. chinensis (25%) than in Orange Reeva and Gelato (13%). As a result, the variation in photosynthetic efficiency under fluctuating light among rose cultivars was tightly related to g(m). These results highlight the importance of g(m) in dynamic photosynthesis and provide new traits for improving photosynthetic efficiency in rose cultivars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10005413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100054132023-03-11 Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis Wang, Xiao-Qian Zeng, Zhi-Lan Shi, Zi-Ming Wang, Ji-Hua Huang, Wei Plants (Basel) Article Photosynthetic efficiency under both steady-state and fluctuating light can significantly affect plant growth under naturally fluctuating light conditions. However, the difference in photosynthetic performance between different rose genotypes is little known. This study compared the photosynthetic performance under steady-state and fluctuating light in two modern rose cultivars (Rose hybrida), “Orange Reeva” and “Gelato”, and an old Chinese rose plant Rosa chinensis cultivar, “Slater’s crimson China”. The light and CO(2) response curves indicated that they showed similar photosynthetic capacity under steady state. The light-saturated steady-state photosynthesis in these three rose genotypes was mainly limited by biochemistry (60%) rather than diffusional conductance. Under fluctuating light conditions (alternated between 100 and 1500 μmol photons m(−2) m(−1) every 5 min), stomatal conductance gradually decreased in these three rose genotypes, while mesophyll conductance (g(m)) was maintained stable in Orange Reeva and Gelato but decreased by 23% in R. chinensis, resulting in a stronger loss of CO(2) assimilation under high-light phases in R. chinensis (25%) than in Orange Reeva and Gelato (13%). As a result, the variation in photosynthetic efficiency under fluctuating light among rose cultivars was tightly related to g(m). These results highlight the importance of g(m) in dynamic photosynthesis and provide new traits for improving photosynthetic efficiency in rose cultivars. MDPI 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10005413/ /pubmed/36904047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051186 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Xiao-Qian
Zeng, Zhi-Lan
Shi, Zi-Ming
Wang, Ji-Hua
Huang, Wei
Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis
title Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis
title_full Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis
title_fullStr Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis
title_full_unstemmed Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis
title_short Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis
title_sort variation in photosynthetic efficiency under fluctuating light between rose cultivars and its potential for improving dynamic photosynthesis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051186
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiaoqian variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis
AT zengzhilan variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis
AT shiziming variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis
AT wangjihua variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis
AT huangwei variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis