Cargando…
Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis
Photosynthetic efficiency under both steady-state and fluctuating light can significantly affect plant growth under naturally fluctuating light conditions. However, the difference in photosynthetic performance between different rose genotypes is little known. This study compared the photosynthetic p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051186 |
_version_ | 1784905074224398336 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xiao-Qian Zeng, Zhi-Lan Shi, Zi-Ming Wang, Ji-Hua Huang, Wei |
author_facet | Wang, Xiao-Qian Zeng, Zhi-Lan Shi, Zi-Ming Wang, Ji-Hua Huang, Wei |
author_sort | Wang, Xiao-Qian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Photosynthetic efficiency under both steady-state and fluctuating light can significantly affect plant growth under naturally fluctuating light conditions. However, the difference in photosynthetic performance between different rose genotypes is little known. This study compared the photosynthetic performance under steady-state and fluctuating light in two modern rose cultivars (Rose hybrida), “Orange Reeva” and “Gelato”, and an old Chinese rose plant Rosa chinensis cultivar, “Slater’s crimson China”. The light and CO(2) response curves indicated that they showed similar photosynthetic capacity under steady state. The light-saturated steady-state photosynthesis in these three rose genotypes was mainly limited by biochemistry (60%) rather than diffusional conductance. Under fluctuating light conditions (alternated between 100 and 1500 μmol photons m(−2) m(−1) every 5 min), stomatal conductance gradually decreased in these three rose genotypes, while mesophyll conductance (g(m)) was maintained stable in Orange Reeva and Gelato but decreased by 23% in R. chinensis, resulting in a stronger loss of CO(2) assimilation under high-light phases in R. chinensis (25%) than in Orange Reeva and Gelato (13%). As a result, the variation in photosynthetic efficiency under fluctuating light among rose cultivars was tightly related to g(m). These results highlight the importance of g(m) in dynamic photosynthesis and provide new traits for improving photosynthetic efficiency in rose cultivars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10005413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100054132023-03-11 Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis Wang, Xiao-Qian Zeng, Zhi-Lan Shi, Zi-Ming Wang, Ji-Hua Huang, Wei Plants (Basel) Article Photosynthetic efficiency under both steady-state and fluctuating light can significantly affect plant growth under naturally fluctuating light conditions. However, the difference in photosynthetic performance between different rose genotypes is little known. This study compared the photosynthetic performance under steady-state and fluctuating light in two modern rose cultivars (Rose hybrida), “Orange Reeva” and “Gelato”, and an old Chinese rose plant Rosa chinensis cultivar, “Slater’s crimson China”. The light and CO(2) response curves indicated that they showed similar photosynthetic capacity under steady state. The light-saturated steady-state photosynthesis in these three rose genotypes was mainly limited by biochemistry (60%) rather than diffusional conductance. Under fluctuating light conditions (alternated between 100 and 1500 μmol photons m(−2) m(−1) every 5 min), stomatal conductance gradually decreased in these three rose genotypes, while mesophyll conductance (g(m)) was maintained stable in Orange Reeva and Gelato but decreased by 23% in R. chinensis, resulting in a stronger loss of CO(2) assimilation under high-light phases in R. chinensis (25%) than in Orange Reeva and Gelato (13%). As a result, the variation in photosynthetic efficiency under fluctuating light among rose cultivars was tightly related to g(m). These results highlight the importance of g(m) in dynamic photosynthesis and provide new traits for improving photosynthetic efficiency in rose cultivars. MDPI 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10005413/ /pubmed/36904047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051186 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Xiao-Qian Zeng, Zhi-Lan Shi, Zi-Ming Wang, Ji-Hua Huang, Wei Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis |
title | Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis |
title_full | Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis |
title_fullStr | Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis |
title_short | Variation in Photosynthetic Efficiency under Fluctuating Light between Rose Cultivars and its Potential for Improving Dynamic Photosynthesis |
title_sort | variation in photosynthetic efficiency under fluctuating light between rose cultivars and its potential for improving dynamic photosynthesis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxiaoqian variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis AT zengzhilan variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis AT shiziming variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis AT wangjihua variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis AT huangwei variationinphotosyntheticefficiencyunderfluctuatinglightbetweenrosecultivarsanditspotentialforimprovingdynamicphotosynthesis |