Cargando…
Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae
Species of the family Apiaceae occupy a major market share but are hitherto dependent on open pollinated cultivars. This results in a lack of production uniformity and reduced quality that has fostered hybrid seed production. The difficulty in flower emasculation led breeders to use biotechnology ap...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051060 |
_version_ | 1784905118766858240 |
---|---|
author | Ranaware, Ankush S. Kunchge, Nandkumar S. Lele, Smita S. Ochatt, Sergio J. |
author_facet | Ranaware, Ankush S. Kunchge, Nandkumar S. Lele, Smita S. Ochatt, Sergio J. |
author_sort | Ranaware, Ankush S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Species of the family Apiaceae occupy a major market share but are hitherto dependent on open pollinated cultivars. This results in a lack of production uniformity and reduced quality that has fostered hybrid seed production. The difficulty in flower emasculation led breeders to use biotechnology approaches including somatic hybridization. We discuss the use of protoplast technology for the development of somatic hybrids, cybrids and in-vitro breeding of commercial traits such as CMS (cytoplasmic male sterility), GMS (genetic male sterility) and EGMS (environment-sensitive genic male sterility). The molecular mechanism(s) underlying CMS and its candidate genes are also discussed. Cybridization strategies based on enucleation (Gamma rays, X-rays and UV rays) and metabolically arresting protoplasts with chemicals such as iodoacetamide or iodoacetate are reviewed. Differential fluorescence staining of fused protoplast as routinely used can be replaced by new tagging approaches using non-toxic proteins. Here, we focused on the initial plant materials and tissue sources for protoplast isolation, the various digestion enzyme mixtures tested, and on the understanding of cell wall re-generation, all of which intervene in somatic hybrids regeneration. Although there are no alternatives to somatic hybridization, various approaches also discussed are emerging, viz., robotic platforms, artificial intelligence, in recent breeding programs for trait identification and selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10005591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100055912023-03-11 Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae Ranaware, Ankush S. Kunchge, Nandkumar S. Lele, Smita S. Ochatt, Sergio J. Plants (Basel) Review Species of the family Apiaceae occupy a major market share but are hitherto dependent on open pollinated cultivars. This results in a lack of production uniformity and reduced quality that has fostered hybrid seed production. The difficulty in flower emasculation led breeders to use biotechnology approaches including somatic hybridization. We discuss the use of protoplast technology for the development of somatic hybrids, cybrids and in-vitro breeding of commercial traits such as CMS (cytoplasmic male sterility), GMS (genetic male sterility) and EGMS (environment-sensitive genic male sterility). The molecular mechanism(s) underlying CMS and its candidate genes are also discussed. Cybridization strategies based on enucleation (Gamma rays, X-rays and UV rays) and metabolically arresting protoplasts with chemicals such as iodoacetamide or iodoacetate are reviewed. Differential fluorescence staining of fused protoplast as routinely used can be replaced by new tagging approaches using non-toxic proteins. Here, we focused on the initial plant materials and tissue sources for protoplast isolation, the various digestion enzyme mixtures tested, and on the understanding of cell wall re-generation, all of which intervene in somatic hybrids regeneration. Although there are no alternatives to somatic hybridization, various approaches also discussed are emerging, viz., robotic platforms, artificial intelligence, in recent breeding programs for trait identification and selection. MDPI 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10005591/ /pubmed/36903923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051060 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ranaware, Ankush S. Kunchge, Nandkumar S. Lele, Smita S. Ochatt, Sergio J. Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae |
title | Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae |
title_full | Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae |
title_fullStr | Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae |
title_full_unstemmed | Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae |
title_short | Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae |
title_sort | protoplast technology and somatic hybridisation in the family apiaceae |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranawareankushs protoplasttechnologyandsomatichybridisationinthefamilyapiaceae AT kunchgenandkumars protoplasttechnologyandsomatichybridisationinthefamilyapiaceae AT lelesmitas protoplasttechnologyandsomatichybridisationinthefamilyapiaceae AT ochattsergioj protoplasttechnologyandsomatichybridisationinthefamilyapiaceae |