Cargando…

Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae

Species of the family Apiaceae occupy a major market share but are hitherto dependent on open pollinated cultivars. This results in a lack of production uniformity and reduced quality that has fostered hybrid seed production. The difficulty in flower emasculation led breeders to use biotechnology ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranaware, Ankush S., Kunchge, Nandkumar S., Lele, Smita S., Ochatt, Sergio J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051060
_version_ 1784905118766858240
author Ranaware, Ankush S.
Kunchge, Nandkumar S.
Lele, Smita S.
Ochatt, Sergio J.
author_facet Ranaware, Ankush S.
Kunchge, Nandkumar S.
Lele, Smita S.
Ochatt, Sergio J.
author_sort Ranaware, Ankush S.
collection PubMed
description Species of the family Apiaceae occupy a major market share but are hitherto dependent on open pollinated cultivars. This results in a lack of production uniformity and reduced quality that has fostered hybrid seed production. The difficulty in flower emasculation led breeders to use biotechnology approaches including somatic hybridization. We discuss the use of protoplast technology for the development of somatic hybrids, cybrids and in-vitro breeding of commercial traits such as CMS (cytoplasmic male sterility), GMS (genetic male sterility) and EGMS (environment-sensitive genic male sterility). The molecular mechanism(s) underlying CMS and its candidate genes are also discussed. Cybridization strategies based on enucleation (Gamma rays, X-rays and UV rays) and metabolically arresting protoplasts with chemicals such as iodoacetamide or iodoacetate are reviewed. Differential fluorescence staining of fused protoplast as routinely used can be replaced by new tagging approaches using non-toxic proteins. Here, we focused on the initial plant materials and tissue sources for protoplast isolation, the various digestion enzyme mixtures tested, and on the understanding of cell wall re-generation, all of which intervene in somatic hybrids regeneration. Although there are no alternatives to somatic hybridization, various approaches also discussed are emerging, viz., robotic platforms, artificial intelligence, in recent breeding programs for trait identification and selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10005591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100055912023-03-11 Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae Ranaware, Ankush S. Kunchge, Nandkumar S. Lele, Smita S. Ochatt, Sergio J. Plants (Basel) Review Species of the family Apiaceae occupy a major market share but are hitherto dependent on open pollinated cultivars. This results in a lack of production uniformity and reduced quality that has fostered hybrid seed production. The difficulty in flower emasculation led breeders to use biotechnology approaches including somatic hybridization. We discuss the use of protoplast technology for the development of somatic hybrids, cybrids and in-vitro breeding of commercial traits such as CMS (cytoplasmic male sterility), GMS (genetic male sterility) and EGMS (environment-sensitive genic male sterility). The molecular mechanism(s) underlying CMS and its candidate genes are also discussed. Cybridization strategies based on enucleation (Gamma rays, X-rays and UV rays) and metabolically arresting protoplasts with chemicals such as iodoacetamide or iodoacetate are reviewed. Differential fluorescence staining of fused protoplast as routinely used can be replaced by new tagging approaches using non-toxic proteins. Here, we focused on the initial plant materials and tissue sources for protoplast isolation, the various digestion enzyme mixtures tested, and on the understanding of cell wall re-generation, all of which intervene in somatic hybrids regeneration. Although there are no alternatives to somatic hybridization, various approaches also discussed are emerging, viz., robotic platforms, artificial intelligence, in recent breeding programs for trait identification and selection. MDPI 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10005591/ /pubmed/36903923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051060 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ranaware, Ankush S.
Kunchge, Nandkumar S.
Lele, Smita S.
Ochatt, Sergio J.
Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae
title Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae
title_full Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae
title_fullStr Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae
title_full_unstemmed Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae
title_short Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae
title_sort protoplast technology and somatic hybridisation in the family apiaceae
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12051060
work_keys_str_mv AT ranawareankushs protoplasttechnologyandsomatichybridisationinthefamilyapiaceae
AT kunchgenandkumars protoplasttechnologyandsomatichybridisationinthefamilyapiaceae
AT lelesmitas protoplasttechnologyandsomatichybridisationinthefamilyapiaceae
AT ochattsergioj protoplasttechnologyandsomatichybridisationinthefamilyapiaceae