Cargando…
Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial
BACKGROUND: Some studies suggested that the patients included in the Z0011 trial may represent patients with ultrasound-negative axillary nodes and axillary invasion diagnosed by sentinel node (SN) biopsy. Nevertheless, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend SN mapping...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915822 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-480 |
_version_ | 1784905212387917824 |
---|---|
author | Vernet-Tomás, Maria Argudo, Nuria Jimenez, Marta Masó, Paula De Miguel, Maite Martínez, Anabel Vidal-Sicart, Sergi Aguilar, Yolanda Rubio, Lourdes Valhondo, Raquel Alcantara, Rodrigo Arenas, Natalia Pitarch, Mireia de las Heras, Ivonne Vázquez Comerma, Laura Sanz, Javier Algara, Manuel Noguera, Alicia Nicolau, Pau |
author_facet | Vernet-Tomás, Maria Argudo, Nuria Jimenez, Marta Masó, Paula De Miguel, Maite Martínez, Anabel Vidal-Sicart, Sergi Aguilar, Yolanda Rubio, Lourdes Valhondo, Raquel Alcantara, Rodrigo Arenas, Natalia Pitarch, Mireia de las Heras, Ivonne Vázquez Comerma, Laura Sanz, Javier Algara, Manuel Noguera, Alicia Nicolau, Pau |
author_sort | Vernet-Tomás, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Some studies suggested that the patients included in the Z0011 trial may represent patients with ultrasound-negative axillary nodes and axillary invasion diagnosed by sentinel node (SN) biopsy. Nevertheless, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend SN mapping if 1 or 2 suspicious lymph nodes are identified on axillary ultrasound (AU). The aim of this preliminary phase of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial was to establish the accuracy of SN mapping in patients with axillary involvement undergoing upfront surgery. METHODS: Between September 2019 and March 2022, we recruited patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary nodes and upfront surgery from a single center. We performed SN mapping in these patients before the surgical intervention, which included axillary lymph node dissection. The biopsy-proven metastatic node, SNs and the remaining axillary nodes were excised separately. SN status was considered representative of the status of the remaining axillary nodes. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of the SN, overall and in patients with palpable nodes, in those with non-palpable nodes and an AU leading to diagnosis of axillary involvement, in those with 1 or 2 suspicious nodes on AU, and in patients with a single suspicious node on AU. We evaluated clinical, imaging and pathology features as predictors of the status of the remaining axillary nodes, false-negatives, and false-positives. RESULTS: We included 25 patients in this phase. The false-negative rate of SN mapping was 28% overall, 21.42% for patients with palpable nodes, 36.36% for patients with non-palpable nodes and an AU diagnosis of axillary involvement, 28.75% for those with 1 or 2 suspicious nodes on AU, and 15.38% in patients with a single suspicious node on AU. The negative predictive value was highest in patients with a single suspicious node on AU (75%). The only significant predictive factor was that FN showed a higher Ki67 index score. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SN mapping was not reliable in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary nodes and upfront surgery for any of the subgroups studied. Further research should elucidate the best staging pathways in these patients to avoid premature de-escalation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10005988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100059882023-03-12 Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial Vernet-Tomás, Maria Argudo, Nuria Jimenez, Marta Masó, Paula De Miguel, Maite Martínez, Anabel Vidal-Sicart, Sergi Aguilar, Yolanda Rubio, Lourdes Valhondo, Raquel Alcantara, Rodrigo Arenas, Natalia Pitarch, Mireia de las Heras, Ivonne Vázquez Comerma, Laura Sanz, Javier Algara, Manuel Noguera, Alicia Nicolau, Pau Gland Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Some studies suggested that the patients included in the Z0011 trial may represent patients with ultrasound-negative axillary nodes and axillary invasion diagnosed by sentinel node (SN) biopsy. Nevertheless, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend SN mapping if 1 or 2 suspicious lymph nodes are identified on axillary ultrasound (AU). The aim of this preliminary phase of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial was to establish the accuracy of SN mapping in patients with axillary involvement undergoing upfront surgery. METHODS: Between September 2019 and March 2022, we recruited patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary nodes and upfront surgery from a single center. We performed SN mapping in these patients before the surgical intervention, which included axillary lymph node dissection. The biopsy-proven metastatic node, SNs and the remaining axillary nodes were excised separately. SN status was considered representative of the status of the remaining axillary nodes. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of the SN, overall and in patients with palpable nodes, in those with non-palpable nodes and an AU leading to diagnosis of axillary involvement, in those with 1 or 2 suspicious nodes on AU, and in patients with a single suspicious node on AU. We evaluated clinical, imaging and pathology features as predictors of the status of the remaining axillary nodes, false-negatives, and false-positives. RESULTS: We included 25 patients in this phase. The false-negative rate of SN mapping was 28% overall, 21.42% for patients with palpable nodes, 36.36% for patients with non-palpable nodes and an AU diagnosis of axillary involvement, 28.75% for those with 1 or 2 suspicious nodes on AU, and 15.38% in patients with a single suspicious node on AU. The negative predictive value was highest in patients with a single suspicious node on AU (75%). The only significant predictive factor was that FN showed a higher Ki67 index score. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SN mapping was not reliable in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary nodes and upfront surgery for any of the subgroups studied. Further research should elucidate the best staging pathways in these patients to avoid premature de-escalation. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-02 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10005988/ /pubmed/36915822 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-480 Text en 2023 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vernet-Tomás, Maria Argudo, Nuria Jimenez, Marta Masó, Paula De Miguel, Maite Martínez, Anabel Vidal-Sicart, Sergi Aguilar, Yolanda Rubio, Lourdes Valhondo, Raquel Alcantara, Rodrigo Arenas, Natalia Pitarch, Mireia de las Heras, Ivonne Vázquez Comerma, Laura Sanz, Javier Algara, Manuel Noguera, Alicia Nicolau, Pau Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial |
title | Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial |
title_full | Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial |
title_short | Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial |
title_sort | accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the multimodal targeted axillary surgery (mutas) trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915822 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vernettomasmaria accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT argudonuria accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT jimenezmarta accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT masopaula accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT demiguelmaite accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT martinezanabel accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT vidalsicartsergi accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT aguilaryolanda accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT rubiolourdes accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT valhondoraquel accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT alcantararodrigo accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT arenasnatalia accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT pitarchmireia accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT delasherasivonnevazquez accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT comermalaura accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT sanzjavier accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT algaramanuel accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT nogueraalicia accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial AT nicolaupau accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial |