Cargando…

Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial

BACKGROUND: Some studies suggested that the patients included in the Z0011 trial may represent patients with ultrasound-negative axillary nodes and axillary invasion diagnosed by sentinel node (SN) biopsy. Nevertheless, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend SN mapping...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vernet-Tomás, Maria, Argudo, Nuria, Jimenez, Marta, Masó, Paula, De Miguel, Maite, Martínez, Anabel, Vidal-Sicart, Sergi, Aguilar, Yolanda, Rubio, Lourdes, Valhondo, Raquel, Alcantara, Rodrigo, Arenas, Natalia, Pitarch, Mireia, de las Heras, Ivonne Vázquez, Comerma, Laura, Sanz, Javier, Algara, Manuel, Noguera, Alicia, Nicolau, Pau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915822
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-480
_version_ 1784905212387917824
author Vernet-Tomás, Maria
Argudo, Nuria
Jimenez, Marta
Masó, Paula
De Miguel, Maite
Martínez, Anabel
Vidal-Sicart, Sergi
Aguilar, Yolanda
Rubio, Lourdes
Valhondo, Raquel
Alcantara, Rodrigo
Arenas, Natalia
Pitarch, Mireia
de las Heras, Ivonne Vázquez
Comerma, Laura
Sanz, Javier
Algara, Manuel
Noguera, Alicia
Nicolau, Pau
author_facet Vernet-Tomás, Maria
Argudo, Nuria
Jimenez, Marta
Masó, Paula
De Miguel, Maite
Martínez, Anabel
Vidal-Sicart, Sergi
Aguilar, Yolanda
Rubio, Lourdes
Valhondo, Raquel
Alcantara, Rodrigo
Arenas, Natalia
Pitarch, Mireia
de las Heras, Ivonne Vázquez
Comerma, Laura
Sanz, Javier
Algara, Manuel
Noguera, Alicia
Nicolau, Pau
author_sort Vernet-Tomás, Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some studies suggested that the patients included in the Z0011 trial may represent patients with ultrasound-negative axillary nodes and axillary invasion diagnosed by sentinel node (SN) biopsy. Nevertheless, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend SN mapping if 1 or 2 suspicious lymph nodes are identified on axillary ultrasound (AU). The aim of this preliminary phase of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial was to establish the accuracy of SN mapping in patients with axillary involvement undergoing upfront surgery. METHODS: Between September 2019 and March 2022, we recruited patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary nodes and upfront surgery from a single center. We performed SN mapping in these patients before the surgical intervention, which included axillary lymph node dissection. The biopsy-proven metastatic node, SNs and the remaining axillary nodes were excised separately. SN status was considered representative of the status of the remaining axillary nodes. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of the SN, overall and in patients with palpable nodes, in those with non-palpable nodes and an AU leading to diagnosis of axillary involvement, in those with 1 or 2 suspicious nodes on AU, and in patients with a single suspicious node on AU. We evaluated clinical, imaging and pathology features as predictors of the status of the remaining axillary nodes, false-negatives, and false-positives. RESULTS: We included 25 patients in this phase. The false-negative rate of SN mapping was 28% overall, 21.42% for patients with palpable nodes, 36.36% for patients with non-palpable nodes and an AU diagnosis of axillary involvement, 28.75% for those with 1 or 2 suspicious nodes on AU, and 15.38% in patients with a single suspicious node on AU. The negative predictive value was highest in patients with a single suspicious node on AU (75%). The only significant predictive factor was that FN showed a higher Ki67 index score. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SN mapping was not reliable in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary nodes and upfront surgery for any of the subgroups studied. Further research should elucidate the best staging pathways in these patients to avoid premature de-escalation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10005988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100059882023-03-12 Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial Vernet-Tomás, Maria Argudo, Nuria Jimenez, Marta Masó, Paula De Miguel, Maite Martínez, Anabel Vidal-Sicart, Sergi Aguilar, Yolanda Rubio, Lourdes Valhondo, Raquel Alcantara, Rodrigo Arenas, Natalia Pitarch, Mireia de las Heras, Ivonne Vázquez Comerma, Laura Sanz, Javier Algara, Manuel Noguera, Alicia Nicolau, Pau Gland Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Some studies suggested that the patients included in the Z0011 trial may represent patients with ultrasound-negative axillary nodes and axillary invasion diagnosed by sentinel node (SN) biopsy. Nevertheless, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend SN mapping if 1 or 2 suspicious lymph nodes are identified on axillary ultrasound (AU). The aim of this preliminary phase of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial was to establish the accuracy of SN mapping in patients with axillary involvement undergoing upfront surgery. METHODS: Between September 2019 and March 2022, we recruited patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary nodes and upfront surgery from a single center. We performed SN mapping in these patients before the surgical intervention, which included axillary lymph node dissection. The biopsy-proven metastatic node, SNs and the remaining axillary nodes were excised separately. SN status was considered representative of the status of the remaining axillary nodes. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of the SN, overall and in patients with palpable nodes, in those with non-palpable nodes and an AU leading to diagnosis of axillary involvement, in those with 1 or 2 suspicious nodes on AU, and in patients with a single suspicious node on AU. We evaluated clinical, imaging and pathology features as predictors of the status of the remaining axillary nodes, false-negatives, and false-positives. RESULTS: We included 25 patients in this phase. The false-negative rate of SN mapping was 28% overall, 21.42% for patients with palpable nodes, 36.36% for patients with non-palpable nodes and an AU diagnosis of axillary involvement, 28.75% for those with 1 or 2 suspicious nodes on AU, and 15.38% in patients with a single suspicious node on AU. The negative predictive value was highest in patients with a single suspicious node on AU (75%). The only significant predictive factor was that FN showed a higher Ki67 index score. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SN mapping was not reliable in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary nodes and upfront surgery for any of the subgroups studied. Further research should elucidate the best staging pathways in these patients to avoid premature de-escalation. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-02 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10005988/ /pubmed/36915822 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-480 Text en 2023 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Vernet-Tomás, Maria
Argudo, Nuria
Jimenez, Marta
Masó, Paula
De Miguel, Maite
Martínez, Anabel
Vidal-Sicart, Sergi
Aguilar, Yolanda
Rubio, Lourdes
Valhondo, Raquel
Alcantara, Rodrigo
Arenas, Natalia
Pitarch, Mireia
de las Heras, Ivonne Vázquez
Comerma, Laura
Sanz, Javier
Algara, Manuel
Noguera, Alicia
Nicolau, Pau
Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial
title Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial
title_full Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial
title_fullStr Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial
title_short Accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the Multimodal Targeted Axillary Surgery (MUTAS) trial
title_sort accuracy of sentinel node mapping in patients with biopsy-proven metastatic axillary lymph nodes and upfront surgery: preliminary results of the multimodal targeted axillary surgery (mutas) trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915822
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-480
work_keys_str_mv AT vernettomasmaria accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT argudonuria accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT jimenezmarta accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT masopaula accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT demiguelmaite accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT martinezanabel accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT vidalsicartsergi accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT aguilaryolanda accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT rubiolourdes accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT valhondoraquel accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT alcantararodrigo accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT arenasnatalia accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT pitarchmireia accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT delasherasivonnevazquez accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT comermalaura accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT sanzjavier accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT algaramanuel accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT nogueraalicia accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial
AT nicolaupau accuracyofsentinelnodemappinginpatientswithbiopsyprovenmetastaticaxillarylymphnodesandupfrontsurgerypreliminaryresultsofthemultimodaltargetedaxillarysurgerymutastrial