Cargando…
Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy
BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low breast cancer (BC) accounts for 30–51% of all BCs. How to precisely assess the response to neoadjuvant therapy in this heterogenous tumor is currently unanswered. With the advance in multi-omics, refining the molecular subtyping other t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915818 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-729 |
_version_ | 1784905212631187456 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xiaoping Lin, Zhiquan Yu, Qihe Qiu, Chaoran Lai, Chan Huang, Hui Zhang, Yiwen Zhang, Weibin Zhu, Jintao Huang, Xin Li, Weiwen |
author_facet | Li, Xiaoping Lin, Zhiquan Yu, Qihe Qiu, Chaoran Lai, Chan Huang, Hui Zhang, Yiwen Zhang, Weibin Zhu, Jintao Huang, Xin Li, Weiwen |
author_sort | Li, Xiaoping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low breast cancer (BC) accounts for 30–51% of all BCs. How to precisely assess the response to neoadjuvant therapy in this heterogenous tumor is currently unanswered. With the advance in multi-omics, refining the molecular subtyping other than the current hormone receptor (HR)-based subtyping to guide the neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-low BC is potentially feasible. METHODS: The messenger RNA (mRNA), clinical, and pathological data of all HER2-low BC patients (n=368) from the Neoadjuvant I-SPY2 Trial, were retrieved. Ninety-eight patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) were randomly divided into the training and validation sets with 8:2 ratio. The non-pCR cases were corporated into the above datasets with 1:1 ratio. The rest non-pCR cases were served as the test set. Random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and fully connected neural network (FCNN) were applied to establish a 1-dimensional (1D) model based on mRNA data. The method with best prediction value among the 3 models was selected for further modeling when combining pathological features. A new classification of deep learning (CDn) was proposed based on a multi-omics model. After identifying pCR-related features by the integral gradient and unsupervised hierarchical clustering method, the responses to neoadjuvant therapy associated with these features across different subgroups were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with the RF and SVM models, the FCNN model achieved the best performance [area under the curve (AUC): 0.89] based on the mRNA feature. By combining mRNA and pathological features, the FCNN model proposed 2 new subtypes including CD1 and CD0 for HER2-low BC. CD1 increased the sensitivity to predict pCR by 23.5% [to 87.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 78% to 94%] and improved the specificity to pCR by 12.2% (to 77.4%; 95% CI: 69% to 87%) when comparing with the current HR classification for HER2-low BC. CONCLUSIONS: The new typing method (CD1 and CD0) proposed in this study achieved excellent performance for predicting the pCR to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-low BC. The patients who were not sensitive to neoadjuvant therapy according to multi-omics models might receive surgical treatment directly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10005989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100059892023-03-12 Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy Li, Xiaoping Lin, Zhiquan Yu, Qihe Qiu, Chaoran Lai, Chan Huang, Hui Zhang, Yiwen Zhang, Weibin Zhu, Jintao Huang, Xin Li, Weiwen Gland Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low breast cancer (BC) accounts for 30–51% of all BCs. How to precisely assess the response to neoadjuvant therapy in this heterogenous tumor is currently unanswered. With the advance in multi-omics, refining the molecular subtyping other than the current hormone receptor (HR)-based subtyping to guide the neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-low BC is potentially feasible. METHODS: The messenger RNA (mRNA), clinical, and pathological data of all HER2-low BC patients (n=368) from the Neoadjuvant I-SPY2 Trial, were retrieved. Ninety-eight patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) were randomly divided into the training and validation sets with 8:2 ratio. The non-pCR cases were corporated into the above datasets with 1:1 ratio. The rest non-pCR cases were served as the test set. Random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and fully connected neural network (FCNN) were applied to establish a 1-dimensional (1D) model based on mRNA data. The method with best prediction value among the 3 models was selected for further modeling when combining pathological features. A new classification of deep learning (CDn) was proposed based on a multi-omics model. After identifying pCR-related features by the integral gradient and unsupervised hierarchical clustering method, the responses to neoadjuvant therapy associated with these features across different subgroups were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with the RF and SVM models, the FCNN model achieved the best performance [area under the curve (AUC): 0.89] based on the mRNA feature. By combining mRNA and pathological features, the FCNN model proposed 2 new subtypes including CD1 and CD0 for HER2-low BC. CD1 increased the sensitivity to predict pCR by 23.5% [to 87.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 78% to 94%] and improved the specificity to pCR by 12.2% (to 77.4%; 95% CI: 69% to 87%) when comparing with the current HR classification for HER2-low BC. CONCLUSIONS: The new typing method (CD1 and CD0) proposed in this study achieved excellent performance for predicting the pCR to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-low BC. The patients who were not sensitive to neoadjuvant therapy according to multi-omics models might receive surgical treatment directly. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-15 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10005989/ /pubmed/36915818 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-729 Text en 2023 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Xiaoping Lin, Zhiquan Yu, Qihe Qiu, Chaoran Lai, Chan Huang, Hui Zhang, Yiwen Zhang, Weibin Zhu, Jintao Huang, Xin Li, Weiwen Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy |
title | Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy |
title_full | Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy |
title_short | Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy |
title_sort | development and validation of a prognostic model for her2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915818 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixiaoping developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT linzhiquan developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT yuqihe developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT qiuchaoran developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT laichan developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT huanghui developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT zhangyiwen developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT zhangweibin developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT zhujintao developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT huangxin developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy AT liweiwen developmentandvalidationofaprognosticmodelforher2lowbreastcancertoevaluateneoadjuvanttherapy |