Efficacy and safety evaluation of complete intrafascial prostatectomy in suspected prostate cancer patients with dysuria: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Suspected localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients with dysuria Complete intrafascial prostatectomy (CIP) can remove the whole prostate gland with the maximal retain of adjacent normal tissues around the prostate, and can be applied in some suspected localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients with dysuria. However, precious few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of CIP in these patients without preoperative needle biopsies. METHODS: In this retrospective single-arm cohort study, all 22 suspected PCa patients with dysuria who underwent CIP at our hospital were enrolled. The clinical data including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free-serum PSA, prostate volume, perioperative and postoperative complications were collected. The PSA level at 6 weeks after CIP and recoveries of urinary continence and erectile function were acquired in the follow-up procedures, and were used as the main measurements of efficacy and safety for CIP respectively. RESULTS: The patients had an average age of 71.91±8.29 years and an average preoperative PSA level of 10.75±4.25 ng/mL. The operations for all 22 patients were successfully completed. The average operation time was 135.20±41.44 min (range, 40.0–215.0 min), and the average blood loss volume was 128.64±145.09 mL. In total, 17 patients (77.27%) had PCa confirmed by postoperative pathology, and 5 patients (22.73%) had benign prostatic hyperplasia. The PSA level dropped to 0.010±0.004 ng/mL at 6 weeks after surgery. According to the loose criteria to assess urinary incontinence, the patients achieved continence rates of 63.6% immediately after the operation, 95.5% at 1 month, and 100% at 3 months. According to the strict criteria, the continence rates immediately, and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery were 27.3%, 63.6%, 90.9%, 95.5%, and 100%, respectively. None of the patients complained of urinary obstruction symptoms after surgery. Before CIP, all the patients had erectile dysfunction and an International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) score of 9.64±5.91. After surgery, the patients had IIEF-5 scores at 3, 6, and 12 months of 5.45±4.43, 6.95±5.30, and 7.57±5.69, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study had some limitations, CIP may be a prudent option for patients with suspected localized PCa who also present with dysuria.