Cargando…

Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial

BACKGROUND: Low intensity shockwave therapy is an emerging treatment option for men with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. Radial wave therapy (rWT), which differs from focused shockwave (fSWT) as it produces lower pressure waves with lower peak energy, is used to treat soft tissue and skin conditi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bryk, Darren J., Murthy, Prithvi B., Ericson, Kyle J., Shoskes, Daniel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10006002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915873
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-310
_version_ 1784905215962513408
author Bryk, Darren J.
Murthy, Prithvi B.
Ericson, Kyle J.
Shoskes, Daniel A.
author_facet Bryk, Darren J.
Murthy, Prithvi B.
Ericson, Kyle J.
Shoskes, Daniel A.
author_sort Bryk, Darren J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low intensity shockwave therapy is an emerging treatment option for men with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. Radial wave therapy (rWT), which differs from focused shockwave (fSWT) as it produces lower pressure waves with lower peak energy, is used to treat soft tissue and skin conditions and has some data to support its use in vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. There is limited data for the use of rWT for the treatment of erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomy. We report the first trial of rWT for penile rehabilitation after NS radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We performed a prospective, non-randomized, open-label trial. Men with good pre-operative erectile function who underwent a NS radical prostatectomy at our institution from 2018–2020 were considered for inclusion. We compared post-operative erectile function outcomes between the rWT (6 weekly treatments initiated approximately 2 weeks post-operatively) plus standard of care (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor) arm and the non-sham controlled standard of care arm. The primary end point for our study was the proportion of men who returned to “near normal” erectile function, defined as IIEF-5 score ≥17 and erectile hardness score (EHS) ≥3, by 3 months post-operatively between the intervention and control arm. We also compared mean IIEF-5 scores and median EHSs between the arms. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were enrolled, of whom 73 patients had at least one reported survey response between 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. Five (17%) and 11 (26%) patients recovered erectile function in the control and intervention arms, respectively, which was not a statistically significant difference (P=0.37). However, the intervention arm did have a significantly higher median EHS compared to the control arm (1 vs. 2, P=0.03). There were 4 adverse events related to pain during treatment and required only treatment intensity de-escalation. CONCLUSIONS: rWT is safe but did not substantially improve the recovery of early erectile function after NS radical prostatectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10006002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100060022023-03-12 Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial Bryk, Darren J. Murthy, Prithvi B. Ericson, Kyle J. Shoskes, Daniel A. Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: Low intensity shockwave therapy is an emerging treatment option for men with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. Radial wave therapy (rWT), which differs from focused shockwave (fSWT) as it produces lower pressure waves with lower peak energy, is used to treat soft tissue and skin conditions and has some data to support its use in vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. There is limited data for the use of rWT for the treatment of erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomy. We report the first trial of rWT for penile rehabilitation after NS radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We performed a prospective, non-randomized, open-label trial. Men with good pre-operative erectile function who underwent a NS radical prostatectomy at our institution from 2018–2020 were considered for inclusion. We compared post-operative erectile function outcomes between the rWT (6 weekly treatments initiated approximately 2 weeks post-operatively) plus standard of care (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor) arm and the non-sham controlled standard of care arm. The primary end point for our study was the proportion of men who returned to “near normal” erectile function, defined as IIEF-5 score ≥17 and erectile hardness score (EHS) ≥3, by 3 months post-operatively between the intervention and control arm. We also compared mean IIEF-5 scores and median EHSs between the arms. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were enrolled, of whom 73 patients had at least one reported survey response between 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. Five (17%) and 11 (26%) patients recovered erectile function in the control and intervention arms, respectively, which was not a statistically significant difference (P=0.37). However, the intervention arm did have a significantly higher median EHS compared to the control arm (1 vs. 2, P=0.03). There were 4 adverse events related to pain during treatment and required only treatment intensity de-escalation. CONCLUSIONS: rWT is safe but did not substantially improve the recovery of early erectile function after NS radical prostatectomy. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-06 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10006002/ /pubmed/36915873 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-310 Text en 2023 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bryk, Darren J.
Murthy, Prithvi B.
Ericson, Kyle J.
Shoskes, Daniel A.
Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial
title Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial
title_full Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial
title_fullStr Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial
title_full_unstemmed Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial
title_short Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial
title_sort radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10006002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915873
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-310
work_keys_str_mv AT brykdarrenj radialwavetherapydoesnotimproveearlyrecoveryoferectilefunctionafternervesparingradicalprostatectomyaprospectivetrial
AT murthyprithvib radialwavetherapydoesnotimproveearlyrecoveryoferectilefunctionafternervesparingradicalprostatectomyaprospectivetrial
AT ericsonkylej radialwavetherapydoesnotimproveearlyrecoveryoferectilefunctionafternervesparingradicalprostatectomyaprospectivetrial
AT shoskesdaniela radialwavetherapydoesnotimproveearlyrecoveryoferectilefunctionafternervesparingradicalprostatectomyaprospectivetrial