Cargando…

Development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography (echo) based machine learning (ML) models may be useful in identifying patients at high-risk of all-cause mortality. METHODS: We developed ML models (ResNet deep learning using echo videos and CatBoost gradient boosting using echo measurements) to predict 1-year, 3-year,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valsaraj, Akshay, Kalmady, Sunil Vasu, Sharma, Vaibhav, Frost, Matthew, Sun, Weijie, Sepehrvand, Nariman, Ong, Marcus, Equibec, Cyril, Dyck, Jason R.B., Anderson, Todd, Becher, Harald, Weeks, Sarah, Tromp, Jasper, Hung, Chung-Lieh, Ezekowitz, Justin A., Kaul, Padma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10006431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36857967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104479
_version_ 1784905294189428736
author Valsaraj, Akshay
Kalmady, Sunil Vasu
Sharma, Vaibhav
Frost, Matthew
Sun, Weijie
Sepehrvand, Nariman
Ong, Marcus
Equibec, Cyril
Dyck, Jason R.B.
Anderson, Todd
Becher, Harald
Weeks, Sarah
Tromp, Jasper
Hung, Chung-Lieh
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
Kaul, Padma
author_facet Valsaraj, Akshay
Kalmady, Sunil Vasu
Sharma, Vaibhav
Frost, Matthew
Sun, Weijie
Sepehrvand, Nariman
Ong, Marcus
Equibec, Cyril
Dyck, Jason R.B.
Anderson, Todd
Becher, Harald
Weeks, Sarah
Tromp, Jasper
Hung, Chung-Lieh
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
Kaul, Padma
author_sort Valsaraj, Akshay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Echocardiography (echo) based machine learning (ML) models may be useful in identifying patients at high-risk of all-cause mortality. METHODS: We developed ML models (ResNet deep learning using echo videos and CatBoost gradient boosting using echo measurements) to predict 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality. Models were trained on the Mackay dataset, Taiwan (6083 echos, 3626 patients) and validated in the Alberta HEART dataset, Canada (997 echos, 595 patients). We examined the performance of the models overall, and in subgroups (healthy controls, at risk of heart failure (HF), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)). We compared the models' performance to the MAGGIC risk score, and examined the correlation between the models’ predicted probability of death and baseline quality of life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). FINDINGS: Mortality rates at 1-, 3- and 5-years were 14.9%, 28.6%, and 42.5% in the Mackay cohort, and 3.0%, 10.3%, and 18.7%, in the Alberta HEART cohort. The ResNet and CatBoost models achieved area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) between 85% and 92% in internal validation. In external validation, the AUROCs for the ResNet (82%, 82%, and 78%) were significantly better than CatBoost (78%, 73%, and 75%), for 1-, 3- and 5-year mortality prediction respectively, with better or comparable performance to the MAGGIC score. ResNet models predicted higher probability of death in the HFpEF and HFrEF (30%–50%) subgroups than in controls and at risk patients (5%–20%). The predicted probabilities of death correlated with KCCQ scores (all p < 0.05). INTERPRETATION: Echo-based ML models to predict mortality had good internal and external validity, were generalizable, correlated with patients’ quality of life, and are comparable to an established HF risk score. These models can be leveraged for automated risk stratification at point-of-care. FUNDING: Funding for Alberta HEART was provided by an 10.13039/501100000145Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions Interdisciplinary Team Grant no. 10.13039/501100003179AHFMRITG 200801018. P.K. holds a 10.13039/501100000024Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Sex and Gender Science Chair and a Heart & Stroke Foundation Chair in Cardiovascular Research. A.V. and V.S. received funding from the Mitacs Globalink Research Internship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10006431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100064312023-03-12 Development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality Valsaraj, Akshay Kalmady, Sunil Vasu Sharma, Vaibhav Frost, Matthew Sun, Weijie Sepehrvand, Nariman Ong, Marcus Equibec, Cyril Dyck, Jason R.B. Anderson, Todd Becher, Harald Weeks, Sarah Tromp, Jasper Hung, Chung-Lieh Ezekowitz, Justin A. Kaul, Padma eBioMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Echocardiography (echo) based machine learning (ML) models may be useful in identifying patients at high-risk of all-cause mortality. METHODS: We developed ML models (ResNet deep learning using echo videos and CatBoost gradient boosting using echo measurements) to predict 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality. Models were trained on the Mackay dataset, Taiwan (6083 echos, 3626 patients) and validated in the Alberta HEART dataset, Canada (997 echos, 595 patients). We examined the performance of the models overall, and in subgroups (healthy controls, at risk of heart failure (HF), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)). We compared the models' performance to the MAGGIC risk score, and examined the correlation between the models’ predicted probability of death and baseline quality of life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). FINDINGS: Mortality rates at 1-, 3- and 5-years were 14.9%, 28.6%, and 42.5% in the Mackay cohort, and 3.0%, 10.3%, and 18.7%, in the Alberta HEART cohort. The ResNet and CatBoost models achieved area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) between 85% and 92% in internal validation. In external validation, the AUROCs for the ResNet (82%, 82%, and 78%) were significantly better than CatBoost (78%, 73%, and 75%), for 1-, 3- and 5-year mortality prediction respectively, with better or comparable performance to the MAGGIC score. ResNet models predicted higher probability of death in the HFpEF and HFrEF (30%–50%) subgroups than in controls and at risk patients (5%–20%). The predicted probabilities of death correlated with KCCQ scores (all p < 0.05). INTERPRETATION: Echo-based ML models to predict mortality had good internal and external validity, were generalizable, correlated with patients’ quality of life, and are comparable to an established HF risk score. These models can be leveraged for automated risk stratification at point-of-care. FUNDING: Funding for Alberta HEART was provided by an 10.13039/501100000145Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions Interdisciplinary Team Grant no. 10.13039/501100003179AHFMRITG 200801018. P.K. holds a 10.13039/501100000024Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Sex and Gender Science Chair and a Heart & Stroke Foundation Chair in Cardiovascular Research. A.V. and V.S. received funding from the Mitacs Globalink Research Internship. Elsevier 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10006431/ /pubmed/36857967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104479 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Valsaraj, Akshay
Kalmady, Sunil Vasu
Sharma, Vaibhav
Frost, Matthew
Sun, Weijie
Sepehrvand, Nariman
Ong, Marcus
Equibec, Cyril
Dyck, Jason R.B.
Anderson, Todd
Becher, Harald
Weeks, Sarah
Tromp, Jasper
Hung, Chung-Lieh
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
Kaul, Padma
Development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality
title Development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality
title_full Development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality
title_fullStr Development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality
title_short Development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality
title_sort development and validation of echocardiography-based machine-learning models to predict mortality
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10006431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36857967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104479
work_keys_str_mv AT valsarajakshay developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT kalmadysunilvasu developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT sharmavaibhav developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT frostmatthew developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT sunweijie developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT sepehrvandnariman developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT ongmarcus developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT equibeccyril developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT dyckjasonrb developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT andersontodd developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT becherharald developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT weekssarah developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT trompjasper developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT hungchunglieh developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT ezekowitzjustina developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality
AT kaulpadma developmentandvalidationofechocardiographybasedmachinelearningmodelstopredictmortality