Cargando…

Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature

Islets transplanted for type-1 diabetes have their viability reduced by warm ischemia, dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG; hypoxia model), oxidative stress and cytokine injury. This results in frequent transplant failures and the major burden of patients having to undergo multiple rounds of treatment for i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habibalahi, Abbas, Campbell, Jared M., Walters, Stacey N., Mahbub, Saabah B., Anwer, Ayad G., Grey, Shane T., Goldys, Ewa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10006710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2023.02.039
_version_ 1784905359505227776
author Habibalahi, Abbas
Campbell, Jared M.
Walters, Stacey N.
Mahbub, Saabah B.
Anwer, Ayad G.
Grey, Shane T.
Goldys, Ewa M.
author_facet Habibalahi, Abbas
Campbell, Jared M.
Walters, Stacey N.
Mahbub, Saabah B.
Anwer, Ayad G.
Grey, Shane T.
Goldys, Ewa M.
author_sort Habibalahi, Abbas
collection PubMed
description Islets transplanted for type-1 diabetes have their viability reduced by warm ischemia, dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG; hypoxia model), oxidative stress and cytokine injury. This results in frequent transplant failures and the major burden of patients having to undergo multiple rounds of treatment for insulin independence. Presently there is no reliable measure to assess islet preparation viability prior to clinical transplantation. We investigated deep morphological signatures (DMS) for detecting the exposure of islets to viability compromising insults from brightfield images. Accuracies ranged from 98 % to 68 % for; ROS damage, pro-inflammatory cytokines, warm ischemia and DMOG. When islets were disaggregated to single cells to enable higher throughput data collection, good accuracy was still obtained (83–71 %). Encapsulation of islets reduced accuracy for cytokine exposure, but it was still high (78 %). Unsupervised modelling of the DMS for islet preparations transplanted into a syngeneic mouse model was able to predict whether or not they would restore glucose control with 100 % accuracy. Our strategy for constructing DMS' is effective for the assessment of islet pre-transplant viability. If translated into the clinic, standard equipment could be used to prospectively identify non-functional islet preparations unable to contribute to the restoration of glucose control and reduce the burden of unsuccessful treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10006710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100067102023-03-12 Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature Habibalahi, Abbas Campbell, Jared M. Walters, Stacey N. Mahbub, Saabah B. Anwer, Ayad G. Grey, Shane T. Goldys, Ewa M. Comput Struct Biotechnol J Research Article Islets transplanted for type-1 diabetes have their viability reduced by warm ischemia, dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG; hypoxia model), oxidative stress and cytokine injury. This results in frequent transplant failures and the major burden of patients having to undergo multiple rounds of treatment for insulin independence. Presently there is no reliable measure to assess islet preparation viability prior to clinical transplantation. We investigated deep morphological signatures (DMS) for detecting the exposure of islets to viability compromising insults from brightfield images. Accuracies ranged from 98 % to 68 % for; ROS damage, pro-inflammatory cytokines, warm ischemia and DMOG. When islets were disaggregated to single cells to enable higher throughput data collection, good accuracy was still obtained (83–71 %). Encapsulation of islets reduced accuracy for cytokine exposure, but it was still high (78 %). Unsupervised modelling of the DMS for islet preparations transplanted into a syngeneic mouse model was able to predict whether or not they would restore glucose control with 100 % accuracy. Our strategy for constructing DMS' is effective for the assessment of islet pre-transplant viability. If translated into the clinic, standard equipment could be used to prospectively identify non-functional islet preparations unable to contribute to the restoration of glucose control and reduce the burden of unsuccessful treatments. Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10006710/ /pubmed/36915378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2023.02.039 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Habibalahi, Abbas
Campbell, Jared M.
Walters, Stacey N.
Mahbub, Saabah B.
Anwer, Ayad G.
Grey, Shane T.
Goldys, Ewa M.
Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature
title Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature
title_full Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature
title_fullStr Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature
title_full_unstemmed Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature
title_short Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature
title_sort automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10006710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2023.02.039
work_keys_str_mv AT habibalahiabbas automatedpancreaticisletviabilityassessmentfortransplantationusingbrightfielddeepmorphologicalsignature
AT campbelljaredm automatedpancreaticisletviabilityassessmentfortransplantationusingbrightfielddeepmorphologicalsignature
AT waltersstaceyn automatedpancreaticisletviabilityassessmentfortransplantationusingbrightfielddeepmorphologicalsignature
AT mahbubsaabahb automatedpancreaticisletviabilityassessmentfortransplantationusingbrightfielddeepmorphologicalsignature
AT anwerayadg automatedpancreaticisletviabilityassessmentfortransplantationusingbrightfielddeepmorphologicalsignature
AT greyshanet automatedpancreaticisletviabilityassessmentfortransplantationusingbrightfielddeepmorphologicalsignature
AT goldysewam automatedpancreaticisletviabilityassessmentfortransplantationusingbrightfielddeepmorphologicalsignature