Cargando…

Comparative Study of Green and Traditional Routes for Cellulose Extraction from a Sugarcane By-Product

Sugarcane bagasse (SCB) is the main residue of the sugarcane industry and a promising renewable and sustainable lignocellulosic material. The cellulose component of SCB, present at 40–50%, can be used to produce value-added products for various applications. Herein, we present a comprehensive and co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casanova, Francisca, Freixo, Ricardo, Pereira, Carla F., Ribeiro, Alessandra B., Costa, Eduardo M., Pintado, Manuela E., Ramos, Óscar L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15051251
_version_ 1784905459191250944
author Casanova, Francisca
Freixo, Ricardo
Pereira, Carla F.
Ribeiro, Alessandra B.
Costa, Eduardo M.
Pintado, Manuela E.
Ramos, Óscar L.
author_facet Casanova, Francisca
Freixo, Ricardo
Pereira, Carla F.
Ribeiro, Alessandra B.
Costa, Eduardo M.
Pintado, Manuela E.
Ramos, Óscar L.
author_sort Casanova, Francisca
collection PubMed
description Sugarcane bagasse (SCB) is the main residue of the sugarcane industry and a promising renewable and sustainable lignocellulosic material. The cellulose component of SCB, present at 40–50%, can be used to produce value-added products for various applications. Herein, we present a comprehensive and comparative study of green and traditional approaches for cellulose extraction from the by-product SCB. Green methods of extraction (deep eutectic solvents, organosolv, and hydrothermal processing) were compared to traditional methods (acid and alkaline hydrolyses). The impact of the treatments was evaluated by considering the extract yield, chemical profile, and structural properties. In addition, an evaluation of the sustainability aspects of the most promising cellulose extraction methods was performed. Among the proposed methods, autohydrolysis was the most promising approach in cellulose extraction, yielding 63.5% of a solid fraction with ca. 70% cellulose. The solid fraction showed a crystallinity index of 60.4% and typical cellulose functional groups. This approach was demonstrated to be environmentally friendly, as indicated by the green metrics assessed (E(nvironmental)-factor = 0.30 and Process Mass Intensity (PMI) = 20.5). Autohydrolysis was shown to be the most cost-effective and sustainable approach for the extraction of a cellulose-rich extract from SCB, which is extremely relevant for aiming the valorization of the most abundant by-product of the sugarcane industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10007196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100071962023-03-12 Comparative Study of Green and Traditional Routes for Cellulose Extraction from a Sugarcane By-Product Casanova, Francisca Freixo, Ricardo Pereira, Carla F. Ribeiro, Alessandra B. Costa, Eduardo M. Pintado, Manuela E. Ramos, Óscar L. Polymers (Basel) Article Sugarcane bagasse (SCB) is the main residue of the sugarcane industry and a promising renewable and sustainable lignocellulosic material. The cellulose component of SCB, present at 40–50%, can be used to produce value-added products for various applications. Herein, we present a comprehensive and comparative study of green and traditional approaches for cellulose extraction from the by-product SCB. Green methods of extraction (deep eutectic solvents, organosolv, and hydrothermal processing) were compared to traditional methods (acid and alkaline hydrolyses). The impact of the treatments was evaluated by considering the extract yield, chemical profile, and structural properties. In addition, an evaluation of the sustainability aspects of the most promising cellulose extraction methods was performed. Among the proposed methods, autohydrolysis was the most promising approach in cellulose extraction, yielding 63.5% of a solid fraction with ca. 70% cellulose. The solid fraction showed a crystallinity index of 60.4% and typical cellulose functional groups. This approach was demonstrated to be environmentally friendly, as indicated by the green metrics assessed (E(nvironmental)-factor = 0.30 and Process Mass Intensity (PMI) = 20.5). Autohydrolysis was shown to be the most cost-effective and sustainable approach for the extraction of a cellulose-rich extract from SCB, which is extremely relevant for aiming the valorization of the most abundant by-product of the sugarcane industry. MDPI 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10007196/ /pubmed/36904494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15051251 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Casanova, Francisca
Freixo, Ricardo
Pereira, Carla F.
Ribeiro, Alessandra B.
Costa, Eduardo M.
Pintado, Manuela E.
Ramos, Óscar L.
Comparative Study of Green and Traditional Routes for Cellulose Extraction from a Sugarcane By-Product
title Comparative Study of Green and Traditional Routes for Cellulose Extraction from a Sugarcane By-Product
title_full Comparative Study of Green and Traditional Routes for Cellulose Extraction from a Sugarcane By-Product
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Green and Traditional Routes for Cellulose Extraction from a Sugarcane By-Product
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Green and Traditional Routes for Cellulose Extraction from a Sugarcane By-Product
title_short Comparative Study of Green and Traditional Routes for Cellulose Extraction from a Sugarcane By-Product
title_sort comparative study of green and traditional routes for cellulose extraction from a sugarcane by-product
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15051251
work_keys_str_mv AT casanovafrancisca comparativestudyofgreenandtraditionalroutesforcelluloseextractionfromasugarcanebyproduct
AT freixoricardo comparativestudyofgreenandtraditionalroutesforcelluloseextractionfromasugarcanebyproduct
AT pereiracarlaf comparativestudyofgreenandtraditionalroutesforcelluloseextractionfromasugarcanebyproduct
AT ribeiroalessandrab comparativestudyofgreenandtraditionalroutesforcelluloseextractionfromasugarcanebyproduct
AT costaeduardom comparativestudyofgreenandtraditionalroutesforcelluloseextractionfromasugarcanebyproduct
AT pintadomanuelae comparativestudyofgreenandtraditionalroutesforcelluloseextractionfromasugarcanebyproduct
AT ramososcarl comparativestudyofgreenandtraditionalroutesforcelluloseextractionfromasugarcanebyproduct