Cargando…

Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency

Process sustainability vs. mechanical strength is a strong market-driven claim in Material Extrusion (MEX) Additive Manufacturing (AM). Especially for the most popular polymer, Polylactic Acid (PLA), the concurrent achievement of these opposing goals may become a puzzle, especially since MEX 3D-prin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petousis, Markos, Vidakis, Nectarios, Mountakis, Nikolaos, Karapidakis, Emmanuel, Moutsopoulou, Amalia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904469
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15051232
_version_ 1784905476885970944
author Petousis, Markos
Vidakis, Nectarios
Mountakis, Nikolaos
Karapidakis, Emmanuel
Moutsopoulou, Amalia
author_facet Petousis, Markos
Vidakis, Nectarios
Mountakis, Nikolaos
Karapidakis, Emmanuel
Moutsopoulou, Amalia
author_sort Petousis, Markos
collection PubMed
description Process sustainability vs. mechanical strength is a strong market-driven claim in Material Extrusion (MEX) Additive Manufacturing (AM). Especially for the most popular polymer, Polylactic Acid (PLA), the concurrent achievement of these opposing goals may become a puzzle, especially since MEX 3D-printing offers a variety of process parameters. Herein, multi-objective optimization of material deployment, 3D printing flexural response, and energy consumption in MEX AM with PLA is introduced. To evaluate the impact of the most important generic and device-independent control parameters on these responses, the Robust Design theory was employed. Raster Deposition Angle (RDA), Layer Thickness (LT), Infill Density (ID), Nozzle Temperature (NT), Bed Temperature (BT), and Printing Speed (PS) were selected to compile a five-level orthogonal array. A total of 25 experimental runs with five specimen replicas each accumulated 135 experiments. Analysis of variances and reduced quadratic regression models (RQRM) were used to decompose the impact of each parameter on the responses. The ID, RDA, and LT were ranked first in impact on printing time, material weight, flexural strength, and energy consumption, respectively. The RQRM predictive models were experimentally validated and hold significant technological merit, for the proper adjustment of process control parameters per the MEX 3D-printing case.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10007265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100072652023-03-12 Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency Petousis, Markos Vidakis, Nectarios Mountakis, Nikolaos Karapidakis, Emmanuel Moutsopoulou, Amalia Polymers (Basel) Article Process sustainability vs. mechanical strength is a strong market-driven claim in Material Extrusion (MEX) Additive Manufacturing (AM). Especially for the most popular polymer, Polylactic Acid (PLA), the concurrent achievement of these opposing goals may become a puzzle, especially since MEX 3D-printing offers a variety of process parameters. Herein, multi-objective optimization of material deployment, 3D printing flexural response, and energy consumption in MEX AM with PLA is introduced. To evaluate the impact of the most important generic and device-independent control parameters on these responses, the Robust Design theory was employed. Raster Deposition Angle (RDA), Layer Thickness (LT), Infill Density (ID), Nozzle Temperature (NT), Bed Temperature (BT), and Printing Speed (PS) were selected to compile a five-level orthogonal array. A total of 25 experimental runs with five specimen replicas each accumulated 135 experiments. Analysis of variances and reduced quadratic regression models (RQRM) were used to decompose the impact of each parameter on the responses. The ID, RDA, and LT were ranked first in impact on printing time, material weight, flexural strength, and energy consumption, respectively. The RQRM predictive models were experimentally validated and hold significant technological merit, for the proper adjustment of process control parameters per the MEX 3D-printing case. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10007265/ /pubmed/36904469 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15051232 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Petousis, Markos
Vidakis, Nectarios
Mountakis, Nikolaos
Karapidakis, Emmanuel
Moutsopoulou, Amalia
Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency
title Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency
title_full Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency
title_fullStr Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency
title_short Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency
title_sort functionality versus sustainability for pla in mex 3d printing: the impact of generic process control factors on flexural response and energy efficiency
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904469
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15051232
work_keys_str_mv AT petousismarkos functionalityversussustainabilityforplainmex3dprintingtheimpactofgenericprocesscontrolfactorsonflexuralresponseandenergyefficiency
AT vidakisnectarios functionalityversussustainabilityforplainmex3dprintingtheimpactofgenericprocesscontrolfactorsonflexuralresponseandenergyefficiency
AT mountakisnikolaos functionalityversussustainabilityforplainmex3dprintingtheimpactofgenericprocesscontrolfactorsonflexuralresponseandenergyefficiency
AT karapidakisemmanuel functionalityversussustainabilityforplainmex3dprintingtheimpactofgenericprocesscontrolfactorsonflexuralresponseandenergyefficiency
AT moutsopoulouamalia functionalityversussustainabilityforplainmex3dprintingtheimpactofgenericprocesscontrolfactorsonflexuralresponseandenergyefficiency