Cargando…
Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds
If validated, in-shoe pressure measuring technology allows for the field-based quantification of running gait, including kinematic and kinetic measures. Different algorithmic methods have been proposed to determine foot contact events from in-shoe pressure insole systems, however, these methods have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052736 |
_version_ | 1784905529741541376 |
---|---|
author | Blades, Samuel Marriott, Hunter Hundza, Sandra Honert, Eric C. Stellingwerff, Trent Klimstra, Marc |
author_facet | Blades, Samuel Marriott, Hunter Hundza, Sandra Honert, Eric C. Stellingwerff, Trent Klimstra, Marc |
author_sort | Blades, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | If validated, in-shoe pressure measuring technology allows for the field-based quantification of running gait, including kinematic and kinetic measures. Different algorithmic methods have been proposed to determine foot contact events from in-shoe pressure insole systems, however, these methods have not been evaluated for accuracy, reliability against a gold standard using running data across different slopes, and speeds. Using data from a plantar pressure measurement system, seven different foot contact event detection algorithms based on pressure signals (pressure sum) were compared to vertical ground reaction force data collected from a force instrumented treadmill. Subjects ran on level ground at 2.6, 3.0, 3.4, and 3.8 m/s, six degrees (10.5%) inclined at 2.6, 2.8, and 3.0 m/s, and six degrees declined at 2.6, 2.8, 3.0, and 3.4 m/s. The best performing foot contact event detection algorithm showed maximal mean absolute errors of only 1.0 ms and 5.2 ms for foot contact and foot off, respectively, on level grade, when compared to a 40 N ascending and descending force threshold from the force treadmill data. Additionally, this algorithm was unaffected by grade and had similar levels of errors across all grades. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10007471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100074712023-03-12 Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds Blades, Samuel Marriott, Hunter Hundza, Sandra Honert, Eric C. Stellingwerff, Trent Klimstra, Marc Sensors (Basel) Article If validated, in-shoe pressure measuring technology allows for the field-based quantification of running gait, including kinematic and kinetic measures. Different algorithmic methods have been proposed to determine foot contact events from in-shoe pressure insole systems, however, these methods have not been evaluated for accuracy, reliability against a gold standard using running data across different slopes, and speeds. Using data from a plantar pressure measurement system, seven different foot contact event detection algorithms based on pressure signals (pressure sum) were compared to vertical ground reaction force data collected from a force instrumented treadmill. Subjects ran on level ground at 2.6, 3.0, 3.4, and 3.8 m/s, six degrees (10.5%) inclined at 2.6, 2.8, and 3.0 m/s, and six degrees declined at 2.6, 2.8, 3.0, and 3.4 m/s. The best performing foot contact event detection algorithm showed maximal mean absolute errors of only 1.0 ms and 5.2 ms for foot contact and foot off, respectively, on level grade, when compared to a 40 N ascending and descending force threshold from the force treadmill data. Additionally, this algorithm was unaffected by grade and had similar levels of errors across all grades. MDPI 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10007471/ /pubmed/36904942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052736 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Blades, Samuel Marriott, Hunter Hundza, Sandra Honert, Eric C. Stellingwerff, Trent Klimstra, Marc Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds |
title | Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds |
title_full | Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds |
title_short | Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds |
title_sort | evaluation of different pressure-based foot contact event detection algorithms across different slopes and speeds |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bladessamuel evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds AT marriotthunter evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds AT hundzasandra evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds AT honertericc evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds AT stellingwerfftrent evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds AT klimstramarc evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds |