Cargando…

Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds

If validated, in-shoe pressure measuring technology allows for the field-based quantification of running gait, including kinematic and kinetic measures. Different algorithmic methods have been proposed to determine foot contact events from in-shoe pressure insole systems, however, these methods have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blades, Samuel, Marriott, Hunter, Hundza, Sandra, Honert, Eric C., Stellingwerff, Trent, Klimstra, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904942
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052736
_version_ 1784905529741541376
author Blades, Samuel
Marriott, Hunter
Hundza, Sandra
Honert, Eric C.
Stellingwerff, Trent
Klimstra, Marc
author_facet Blades, Samuel
Marriott, Hunter
Hundza, Sandra
Honert, Eric C.
Stellingwerff, Trent
Klimstra, Marc
author_sort Blades, Samuel
collection PubMed
description If validated, in-shoe pressure measuring technology allows for the field-based quantification of running gait, including kinematic and kinetic measures. Different algorithmic methods have been proposed to determine foot contact events from in-shoe pressure insole systems, however, these methods have not been evaluated for accuracy, reliability against a gold standard using running data across different slopes, and speeds. Using data from a plantar pressure measurement system, seven different foot contact event detection algorithms based on pressure signals (pressure sum) were compared to vertical ground reaction force data collected from a force instrumented treadmill. Subjects ran on level ground at 2.6, 3.0, 3.4, and 3.8 m/s, six degrees (10.5%) inclined at 2.6, 2.8, and 3.0 m/s, and six degrees declined at 2.6, 2.8, 3.0, and 3.4 m/s. The best performing foot contact event detection algorithm showed maximal mean absolute errors of only 1.0 ms and 5.2 ms for foot contact and foot off, respectively, on level grade, when compared to a 40 N ascending and descending force threshold from the force treadmill data. Additionally, this algorithm was unaffected by grade and had similar levels of errors across all grades.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10007471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100074712023-03-12 Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds Blades, Samuel Marriott, Hunter Hundza, Sandra Honert, Eric C. Stellingwerff, Trent Klimstra, Marc Sensors (Basel) Article If validated, in-shoe pressure measuring technology allows for the field-based quantification of running gait, including kinematic and kinetic measures. Different algorithmic methods have been proposed to determine foot contact events from in-shoe pressure insole systems, however, these methods have not been evaluated for accuracy, reliability against a gold standard using running data across different slopes, and speeds. Using data from a plantar pressure measurement system, seven different foot contact event detection algorithms based on pressure signals (pressure sum) were compared to vertical ground reaction force data collected from a force instrumented treadmill. Subjects ran on level ground at 2.6, 3.0, 3.4, and 3.8 m/s, six degrees (10.5%) inclined at 2.6, 2.8, and 3.0 m/s, and six degrees declined at 2.6, 2.8, 3.0, and 3.4 m/s. The best performing foot contact event detection algorithm showed maximal mean absolute errors of only 1.0 ms and 5.2 ms for foot contact and foot off, respectively, on level grade, when compared to a 40 N ascending and descending force threshold from the force treadmill data. Additionally, this algorithm was unaffected by grade and had similar levels of errors across all grades. MDPI 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10007471/ /pubmed/36904942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052736 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Blades, Samuel
Marriott, Hunter
Hundza, Sandra
Honert, Eric C.
Stellingwerff, Trent
Klimstra, Marc
Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds
title Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds
title_full Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds
title_fullStr Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds
title_short Evaluation of Different Pressure-Based Foot Contact Event Detection Algorithms across Different Slopes and Speeds
title_sort evaluation of different pressure-based foot contact event detection algorithms across different slopes and speeds
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904942
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052736
work_keys_str_mv AT bladessamuel evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds
AT marriotthunter evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds
AT hundzasandra evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds
AT honertericc evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds
AT stellingwerfftrent evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds
AT klimstramarc evaluationofdifferentpressurebasedfootcontacteventdetectionalgorithmsacrossdifferentslopesandspeeds