Cargando…

Assessment of Low-Density Force Myography Armband for Classification of Upper Limb Gestures

Using force myography (FMG) to monitor volumetric changes in limb muscles is a promising and effective alternative for controlling bio-robotic prosthetic devices. In recent years, there has been a focus on developing new methods to improve the performance of FMG technology in the control of bio-robo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rehman, Mustafa Ur, Shah, Kamran, Haq, Izhar Ul, Iqbal, Sajid, Ismail, Mohamed A., Selimefendigil, Fatih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052716
_version_ 1784905544273756160
author Rehman, Mustafa Ur
Shah, Kamran
Haq, Izhar Ul
Iqbal, Sajid
Ismail, Mohamed A.
Selimefendigil, Fatih
author_facet Rehman, Mustafa Ur
Shah, Kamran
Haq, Izhar Ul
Iqbal, Sajid
Ismail, Mohamed A.
Selimefendigil, Fatih
author_sort Rehman, Mustafa Ur
collection PubMed
description Using force myography (FMG) to monitor volumetric changes in limb muscles is a promising and effective alternative for controlling bio-robotic prosthetic devices. In recent years, there has been a focus on developing new methods to improve the performance of FMG technology in the control of bio-robotic devices. This study aimed to design and evaluate a novel low-density FMG (LD-FMG) armband for controlling upper limb prostheses. The study investigated the number of sensors and sampling rate for the newly developed LD-FMG band. The performance of the band was evaluated by detecting nine gestures of the hand, wrist, and forearm at varying elbow and shoulder positions. Six subjects, including both fit and amputated individuals, participated in this study and completed two experimental protocols: static and dynamic. The static protocol measured volumetric changes in forearm muscles at the fixed elbow and shoulder positions. In contrast, the dynamic protocol included continuous motion of the elbow and shoulder joints. The results showed that the number of sensors significantly impacts gesture prediction accuracy, with the best accuracy achieved on the 7-sensor FMG band arrangement. Compared to the number of sensors, the sampling rate had a lower influence on prediction accuracy. Additionally, variations in limb position greatly affect the classification accuracy of gestures. The static protocol shows an accuracy above 90% when considering nine gestures. Among dynamic results, shoulder movement shows the least classification error compared to elbow and elbow–shoulder (ES) movements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10007530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100075302023-03-12 Assessment of Low-Density Force Myography Armband for Classification of Upper Limb Gestures Rehman, Mustafa Ur Shah, Kamran Haq, Izhar Ul Iqbal, Sajid Ismail, Mohamed A. Selimefendigil, Fatih Sensors (Basel) Article Using force myography (FMG) to monitor volumetric changes in limb muscles is a promising and effective alternative for controlling bio-robotic prosthetic devices. In recent years, there has been a focus on developing new methods to improve the performance of FMG technology in the control of bio-robotic devices. This study aimed to design and evaluate a novel low-density FMG (LD-FMG) armband for controlling upper limb prostheses. The study investigated the number of sensors and sampling rate for the newly developed LD-FMG band. The performance of the band was evaluated by detecting nine gestures of the hand, wrist, and forearm at varying elbow and shoulder positions. Six subjects, including both fit and amputated individuals, participated in this study and completed two experimental protocols: static and dynamic. The static protocol measured volumetric changes in forearm muscles at the fixed elbow and shoulder positions. In contrast, the dynamic protocol included continuous motion of the elbow and shoulder joints. The results showed that the number of sensors significantly impacts gesture prediction accuracy, with the best accuracy achieved on the 7-sensor FMG band arrangement. Compared to the number of sensors, the sampling rate had a lower influence on prediction accuracy. Additionally, variations in limb position greatly affect the classification accuracy of gestures. The static protocol shows an accuracy above 90% when considering nine gestures. Among dynamic results, shoulder movement shows the least classification error compared to elbow and elbow–shoulder (ES) movements. MDPI 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10007530/ /pubmed/36904919 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052716 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rehman, Mustafa Ur
Shah, Kamran
Haq, Izhar Ul
Iqbal, Sajid
Ismail, Mohamed A.
Selimefendigil, Fatih
Assessment of Low-Density Force Myography Armband for Classification of Upper Limb Gestures
title Assessment of Low-Density Force Myography Armband for Classification of Upper Limb Gestures
title_full Assessment of Low-Density Force Myography Armband for Classification of Upper Limb Gestures
title_fullStr Assessment of Low-Density Force Myography Armband for Classification of Upper Limb Gestures
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Low-Density Force Myography Armband for Classification of Upper Limb Gestures
title_short Assessment of Low-Density Force Myography Armband for Classification of Upper Limb Gestures
title_sort assessment of low-density force myography armband for classification of upper limb gestures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36904919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052716
work_keys_str_mv AT rehmanmustafaur assessmentoflowdensityforcemyographyarmbandforclassificationofupperlimbgestures
AT shahkamran assessmentoflowdensityforcemyographyarmbandforclassificationofupperlimbgestures
AT haqizharul assessmentoflowdensityforcemyographyarmbandforclassificationofupperlimbgestures
AT iqbalsajid assessmentoflowdensityforcemyographyarmbandforclassificationofupperlimbgestures
AT ismailmohameda assessmentoflowdensityforcemyographyarmbandforclassificationofupperlimbgestures
AT selimefendigilfatih assessmentoflowdensityforcemyographyarmbandforclassificationofupperlimbgestures