Cargando…

Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas

Low-cost dual-frequency global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers have recently been tested in various positioning applications. Considering that these sensors can now provide high positioning accuracy at a lower cost, they can be considered an alternative to high-quality geodetic GNSS dev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamza, Veton, Stopar, Bojan, Sterle, Oskar, Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052861
_version_ 1784905562458161152
author Hamza, Veton
Stopar, Bojan
Sterle, Oskar
Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona
author_facet Hamza, Veton
Stopar, Bojan
Sterle, Oskar
Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona
author_sort Hamza, Veton
collection PubMed
description Low-cost dual-frequency global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers have recently been tested in various positioning applications. Considering that these sensors can now provide high positioning accuracy at a lower cost, they can be considered an alternative to high-quality geodetic GNSS devices. The main objectives of this work were to analyze the differences between geodetic and low-cost calibrated antennas on the quality of observations from low-cost GNSS receivers and to evaluate the performance of low-cost GNSS devices in urban areas. In this study, a simple RTK2B V1 board u-blox ZED-F9P (Thalwil, Switzerland) was tested in combination with a low-cost calibrated and geodetic antenna in open-sky and adverse conditions in urban areas, while a high-quality geodetic GNSS device was used as a reference for comparison. The results of the observation quality check show that low-cost GNSS instruments have a lower carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N(0)) than geodetic instruments, especially in the urban areas where the difference is larger and in favor of the geodetic GNSS instruments. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the multipath error in the open sky is twice as high for low-cost as for geodetic instruments, while this difference is up to four times greater in urban areas. The use of a geodetic GNSS antenna does not show a significant improvement in the C/N(0) and multipath of low-cost GNSS receivers. However, the ambiguity fix ratio is larger when geodetic antennas are used, with a difference of 1.5% and 18.4% for the open-sky and urban conditions, respectively. It should be noted that float solutions may become more evident when low-cost equipment is used, especially for short sessions and in urban areas with more multipath. In relative positioning mode, low-cost GNSS devices were able to provide horizontal accuracy lower than 10 mm in urban areas in 85% of sessions, while the vertical and spatial accuracy was lower than 15 mm in 82.5% and 77.5% of the sessions, respectively. In the open sky, low-cost GNSS receivers achieve a horizontal, vertical, and spatial accuracy of 5 mm for all sessions considered. In RTK mode, positioning accuracy varies between 10–30 mm in the open-sky and urban areas, while better performance is demonstrated for the former.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10007599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100075992023-03-12 Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas Hamza, Veton Stopar, Bojan Sterle, Oskar Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona Sensors (Basel) Article Low-cost dual-frequency global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers have recently been tested in various positioning applications. Considering that these sensors can now provide high positioning accuracy at a lower cost, they can be considered an alternative to high-quality geodetic GNSS devices. The main objectives of this work were to analyze the differences between geodetic and low-cost calibrated antennas on the quality of observations from low-cost GNSS receivers and to evaluate the performance of low-cost GNSS devices in urban areas. In this study, a simple RTK2B V1 board u-blox ZED-F9P (Thalwil, Switzerland) was tested in combination with a low-cost calibrated and geodetic antenna in open-sky and adverse conditions in urban areas, while a high-quality geodetic GNSS device was used as a reference for comparison. The results of the observation quality check show that low-cost GNSS instruments have a lower carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N(0)) than geodetic instruments, especially in the urban areas where the difference is larger and in favor of the geodetic GNSS instruments. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the multipath error in the open sky is twice as high for low-cost as for geodetic instruments, while this difference is up to four times greater in urban areas. The use of a geodetic GNSS antenna does not show a significant improvement in the C/N(0) and multipath of low-cost GNSS receivers. However, the ambiguity fix ratio is larger when geodetic antennas are used, with a difference of 1.5% and 18.4% for the open-sky and urban conditions, respectively. It should be noted that float solutions may become more evident when low-cost equipment is used, especially for short sessions and in urban areas with more multipath. In relative positioning mode, low-cost GNSS devices were able to provide horizontal accuracy lower than 10 mm in urban areas in 85% of sessions, while the vertical and spatial accuracy was lower than 15 mm in 82.5% and 77.5% of the sessions, respectively. In the open sky, low-cost GNSS receivers achieve a horizontal, vertical, and spatial accuracy of 5 mm for all sessions considered. In RTK mode, positioning accuracy varies between 10–30 mm in the open-sky and urban areas, while better performance is demonstrated for the former. MDPI 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10007599/ /pubmed/36905063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052861 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hamza, Veton
Stopar, Bojan
Sterle, Oskar
Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona
Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas
title Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas
title_full Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas
title_fullStr Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas
title_full_unstemmed Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas
title_short Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas
title_sort low-cost dual-frequency gnss receivers and antennas for surveying in urban areas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052861
work_keys_str_mv AT hamzaveton lowcostdualfrequencygnssreceiversandantennasforsurveyinginurbanareas
AT stoparbojan lowcostdualfrequencygnssreceiversandantennasforsurveyinginurbanareas
AT sterleoskar lowcostdualfrequencygnssreceiversandantennasforsurveyinginurbanareas
AT pavlovcicpreserenpolona lowcostdualfrequencygnssreceiversandantennasforsurveyinginurbanareas