Cargando…
Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas
Low-cost dual-frequency global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers have recently been tested in various positioning applications. Considering that these sensors can now provide high positioning accuracy at a lower cost, they can be considered an alternative to high-quality geodetic GNSS dev...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052861 |
_version_ | 1784905562458161152 |
---|---|
author | Hamza, Veton Stopar, Bojan Sterle, Oskar Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona |
author_facet | Hamza, Veton Stopar, Bojan Sterle, Oskar Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona |
author_sort | Hamza, Veton |
collection | PubMed |
description | Low-cost dual-frequency global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers have recently been tested in various positioning applications. Considering that these sensors can now provide high positioning accuracy at a lower cost, they can be considered an alternative to high-quality geodetic GNSS devices. The main objectives of this work were to analyze the differences between geodetic and low-cost calibrated antennas on the quality of observations from low-cost GNSS receivers and to evaluate the performance of low-cost GNSS devices in urban areas. In this study, a simple RTK2B V1 board u-blox ZED-F9P (Thalwil, Switzerland) was tested in combination with a low-cost calibrated and geodetic antenna in open-sky and adverse conditions in urban areas, while a high-quality geodetic GNSS device was used as a reference for comparison. The results of the observation quality check show that low-cost GNSS instruments have a lower carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N(0)) than geodetic instruments, especially in the urban areas where the difference is larger and in favor of the geodetic GNSS instruments. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the multipath error in the open sky is twice as high for low-cost as for geodetic instruments, while this difference is up to four times greater in urban areas. The use of a geodetic GNSS antenna does not show a significant improvement in the C/N(0) and multipath of low-cost GNSS receivers. However, the ambiguity fix ratio is larger when geodetic antennas are used, with a difference of 1.5% and 18.4% for the open-sky and urban conditions, respectively. It should be noted that float solutions may become more evident when low-cost equipment is used, especially for short sessions and in urban areas with more multipath. In relative positioning mode, low-cost GNSS devices were able to provide horizontal accuracy lower than 10 mm in urban areas in 85% of sessions, while the vertical and spatial accuracy was lower than 15 mm in 82.5% and 77.5% of the sessions, respectively. In the open sky, low-cost GNSS receivers achieve a horizontal, vertical, and spatial accuracy of 5 mm for all sessions considered. In RTK mode, positioning accuracy varies between 10–30 mm in the open-sky and urban areas, while better performance is demonstrated for the former. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10007599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100075992023-03-12 Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas Hamza, Veton Stopar, Bojan Sterle, Oskar Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona Sensors (Basel) Article Low-cost dual-frequency global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers have recently been tested in various positioning applications. Considering that these sensors can now provide high positioning accuracy at a lower cost, they can be considered an alternative to high-quality geodetic GNSS devices. The main objectives of this work were to analyze the differences between geodetic and low-cost calibrated antennas on the quality of observations from low-cost GNSS receivers and to evaluate the performance of low-cost GNSS devices in urban areas. In this study, a simple RTK2B V1 board u-blox ZED-F9P (Thalwil, Switzerland) was tested in combination with a low-cost calibrated and geodetic antenna in open-sky and adverse conditions in urban areas, while a high-quality geodetic GNSS device was used as a reference for comparison. The results of the observation quality check show that low-cost GNSS instruments have a lower carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N(0)) than geodetic instruments, especially in the urban areas where the difference is larger and in favor of the geodetic GNSS instruments. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the multipath error in the open sky is twice as high for low-cost as for geodetic instruments, while this difference is up to four times greater in urban areas. The use of a geodetic GNSS antenna does not show a significant improvement in the C/N(0) and multipath of low-cost GNSS receivers. However, the ambiguity fix ratio is larger when geodetic antennas are used, with a difference of 1.5% and 18.4% for the open-sky and urban conditions, respectively. It should be noted that float solutions may become more evident when low-cost equipment is used, especially for short sessions and in urban areas with more multipath. In relative positioning mode, low-cost GNSS devices were able to provide horizontal accuracy lower than 10 mm in urban areas in 85% of sessions, while the vertical and spatial accuracy was lower than 15 mm in 82.5% and 77.5% of the sessions, respectively. In the open sky, low-cost GNSS receivers achieve a horizontal, vertical, and spatial accuracy of 5 mm for all sessions considered. In RTK mode, positioning accuracy varies between 10–30 mm in the open-sky and urban areas, while better performance is demonstrated for the former. MDPI 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10007599/ /pubmed/36905063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052861 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hamza, Veton Stopar, Bojan Sterle, Oskar Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas |
title | Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas |
title_full | Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas |
title_fullStr | Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas |
title_short | Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas |
title_sort | low-cost dual-frequency gnss receivers and antennas for surveying in urban areas |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23052861 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamzaveton lowcostdualfrequencygnssreceiversandantennasforsurveyinginurbanareas AT stoparbojan lowcostdualfrequencygnssreceiversandantennasforsurveyinginurbanareas AT sterleoskar lowcostdualfrequencygnssreceiversandantennasforsurveyinginurbanareas AT pavlovcicpreserenpolona lowcostdualfrequencygnssreceiversandantennasforsurveyinginurbanareas |