Cargando…
Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Most cancer-related deaths around the globe are caused by lung cancer. The present treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) are cytotoxic chemotherapy (CCT), targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy, but the benefit of the same regime varies greatly. Hence, it is impo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915421 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S393263 |
_version_ | 1784905658816004096 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Jing Pu, Hongjiang He, Jintao Tang, Xiaohu |
author_facet | Huang, Jing Pu, Hongjiang He, Jintao Tang, Xiaohu |
author_sort | Huang, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most cancer-related deaths around the globe are caused by lung cancer. The present treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) are cytotoxic chemotherapy (CCT), targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy, but the benefit of the same regime varies greatly. Hence, it is important to identify biomarkers to predict the efficacy of modalities. Previous literature suggested certain parameters might be predictive factors. Nevertheless, the utility of these parameters is limited due to the types of solid tumors. PURPOSE: The study aimed to examine whether the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) was related to outcomes of CCT, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and TT for mNSCLC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study between September 2012 and May 2020 was conducted on 350 Chinese mNSCLC patients, including 147 patients receiving ICIs, 103 TT, and 100 CCT. The data were examined to analyze the prognostic value of LIPI among various treatments. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The associations between PFS and good, intermediate, or poor prognostic LIPI scores in ICIs, TT, and CCT were determined, respectively. RESULTS: In univariable analyses, there was a relevance between a good LIPI score and better PFS among patients receiving ICIs (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.44–1.51), TT (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16–1.74), and CCT (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19–0.80). In multivariable analyses, the intermediate LIPI score was linked to better PFS only in patients receiving TT (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17–0.92) rather than ICIs (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.66–2.45) or CCT (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.49–4.55). CONCLUSION: Baseline LIPI value is an important prognostic biomarker for mNSCLC patients treated with TT. Shorter PFS with TT was associated with poor baseline LIPI. Poor LIPI score may be considered as a promising indicator showing which patients are unlikely to respond well to TT. The prognostic value of LIPI can be more clearly determined through prospective clinical study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10008001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100080012023-03-12 Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study Huang, Jing Pu, Hongjiang He, Jintao Tang, Xiaohu Int J Gen Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Most cancer-related deaths around the globe are caused by lung cancer. The present treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) are cytotoxic chemotherapy (CCT), targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy, but the benefit of the same regime varies greatly. Hence, it is important to identify biomarkers to predict the efficacy of modalities. Previous literature suggested certain parameters might be predictive factors. Nevertheless, the utility of these parameters is limited due to the types of solid tumors. PURPOSE: The study aimed to examine whether the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) was related to outcomes of CCT, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and TT for mNSCLC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study between September 2012 and May 2020 was conducted on 350 Chinese mNSCLC patients, including 147 patients receiving ICIs, 103 TT, and 100 CCT. The data were examined to analyze the prognostic value of LIPI among various treatments. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The associations between PFS and good, intermediate, or poor prognostic LIPI scores in ICIs, TT, and CCT were determined, respectively. RESULTS: In univariable analyses, there was a relevance between a good LIPI score and better PFS among patients receiving ICIs (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.44–1.51), TT (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16–1.74), and CCT (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19–0.80). In multivariable analyses, the intermediate LIPI score was linked to better PFS only in patients receiving TT (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17–0.92) rather than ICIs (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.66–2.45) or CCT (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.49–4.55). CONCLUSION: Baseline LIPI value is an important prognostic biomarker for mNSCLC patients treated with TT. Shorter PFS with TT was associated with poor baseline LIPI. Poor LIPI score may be considered as a promising indicator showing which patients are unlikely to respond well to TT. The prognostic value of LIPI can be more clearly determined through prospective clinical study. Dove 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10008001/ /pubmed/36915421 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S393263 Text en © 2023 Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Huang, Jing Pu, Hongjiang He, Jintao Tang, Xiaohu Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study |
title | Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study |
title_full | Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study |
title_short | Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study |
title_sort | prognostic value of the lung immune prognostic index for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients: a chinese cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915421 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S393263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangjing prognosticvalueofthelungimmuneprognosticindexformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsachinesecohortstudy AT puhongjiang prognosticvalueofthelungimmuneprognosticindexformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsachinesecohortstudy AT hejintao prognosticvalueofthelungimmuneprognosticindexformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsachinesecohortstudy AT tangxiaohu prognosticvalueofthelungimmuneprognosticindexformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsachinesecohortstudy |