Cargando…

Right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: To summarize knowledge and identify gaps in evidence regarding treatment of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DATA SOURCES: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganeriwal, Simran, Alves dos Anjos, Gabriele, Schleicher, Mary, Hockstein, Maxwell A., Tonelli, Adriano R., Duggal, Abhijit, Siuba, Matthew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36907888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04395-9
_version_ 1784905691261042688
author Ganeriwal, Simran
Alves dos Anjos, Gabriele
Schleicher, Mary
Hockstein, Maxwell A.
Tonelli, Adriano R.
Duggal, Abhijit
Siuba, Matthew T.
author_facet Ganeriwal, Simran
Alves dos Anjos, Gabriele
Schleicher, Mary
Hockstein, Maxwell A.
Tonelli, Adriano R.
Duggal, Abhijit
Siuba, Matthew T.
author_sort Ganeriwal, Simran
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To summarize knowledge and identify gaps in evidence regarding treatment of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DATA SOURCES: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they reported effects of treatments on right ventricular function, whether or not the intent was to modify right ventricular function. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate by two authors. Data items included the study design, patient population, type of intervention, comparison group, and RV-specific outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 1,430 studies screened, 51 studies reporting on 1,526 patients were included. By frequency, the included studies examined the following interventions: ventilator settings (29.4%), inhaled medications (33.3%), extracorporeal life support (13.7%), intravenous or oral medications (13.7%), and prone positioning (9.8%). The majority of the studies were non-randomized experimental studies (53%), with the next most common being case reports (16%). Only 5.9% of studies were RCTs. In total, 27% of studies were conducted with the goal of modifying RV function. CONCLUSIONS: Given the prevalence of RVD in ARDS and its association with mortality, the dearth of research on this topic is concerning. This review highlights the need for prospective trials aimed at treating RV dysfunction in ARDS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04395-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10008150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100081502023-03-13 Right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review Ganeriwal, Simran Alves dos Anjos, Gabriele Schleicher, Mary Hockstein, Maxwell A. Tonelli, Adriano R. Duggal, Abhijit Siuba, Matthew T. Crit Care Research OBJECTIVE: To summarize knowledge and identify gaps in evidence regarding treatment of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DATA SOURCES: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they reported effects of treatments on right ventricular function, whether or not the intent was to modify right ventricular function. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate by two authors. Data items included the study design, patient population, type of intervention, comparison group, and RV-specific outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 1,430 studies screened, 51 studies reporting on 1,526 patients were included. By frequency, the included studies examined the following interventions: ventilator settings (29.4%), inhaled medications (33.3%), extracorporeal life support (13.7%), intravenous or oral medications (13.7%), and prone positioning (9.8%). The majority of the studies were non-randomized experimental studies (53%), with the next most common being case reports (16%). Only 5.9% of studies were RCTs. In total, 27% of studies were conducted with the goal of modifying RV function. CONCLUSIONS: Given the prevalence of RVD in ARDS and its association with mortality, the dearth of research on this topic is concerning. This review highlights the need for prospective trials aimed at treating RV dysfunction in ARDS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04395-9. BioMed Central 2023-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10008150/ /pubmed/36907888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04395-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ganeriwal, Simran
Alves dos Anjos, Gabriele
Schleicher, Mary
Hockstein, Maxwell A.
Tonelli, Adriano R.
Duggal, Abhijit
Siuba, Matthew T.
Right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review
title Right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review
title_full Right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review
title_fullStr Right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review
title_short Right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review
title_sort right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36907888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04395-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ganeriwalsimran rightventriclespecifictherapiesinacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeascopingreview
AT alvesdosanjosgabriele rightventriclespecifictherapiesinacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeascopingreview
AT schleichermary rightventriclespecifictherapiesinacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeascopingreview
AT hocksteinmaxwella rightventriclespecifictherapiesinacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeascopingreview
AT tonelliadrianor rightventriclespecifictherapiesinacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeascopingreview
AT duggalabhijit rightventriclespecifictherapiesinacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeascopingreview
AT siubamatthewt rightventriclespecifictherapiesinacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeascopingreview