Cargando…

Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples

INTRODUCTION: Streptococcus agalactiae, also known as group B streptococci (GBS), is associated with invasive infections in neonates. Identification of GBS vaginal colonization in pregnant women before delivery is essential for treatment with antibiotics to prevent intrapartum vertical transmission...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koliwer‐Brandl, Hendrik, Nil, Ahmed, Birri, Jana, Sachs, Maike, Zimmermann, Roland, Zbinden, Reinhard, Balsyte, Dalia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14519
_version_ 1784905723144044544
author Koliwer‐Brandl, Hendrik
Nil, Ahmed
Birri, Jana
Sachs, Maike
Zimmermann, Roland
Zbinden, Reinhard
Balsyte, Dalia
author_facet Koliwer‐Brandl, Hendrik
Nil, Ahmed
Birri, Jana
Sachs, Maike
Zimmermann, Roland
Zbinden, Reinhard
Balsyte, Dalia
author_sort Koliwer‐Brandl, Hendrik
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Streptococcus agalactiae, also known as group B streptococci (GBS), is associated with invasive infections in neonates. Identification of GBS vaginal colonization in pregnant women before delivery is essential for treatment with antibiotics to prevent intrapartum vertical transmission to the newborn. This study was designed to evaluate applicability of two rapid real‐time PCRs in comparison to standard culture identification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared the Xpert GBS assay, hereafter referred to as Xpert, and GenomEra GBS PCR, hereafter referred to as GenomEra. The standard culture identification consisted of two different agar plates as well as an enrichment broth. RESULTS: We analyzed vaginal samples of 260 pregnant women; 42 samples were tested GBS‐positive by using standard culture as a gold standard, 30 by Xpert, and 37 by GenomEra. Xpert and GenomEra assays performed with sensitivities of 71.4% and 88.1% as well as specificities of 98.6% and 99.1%, respectively. Twelve vaginal samples were false‐negative by Xpert and five samples by GenomEra. Interestingly, three negative Xpert results of standard culture‐positive samples exhibited high Ct‐values indicating the presence of GBS. If higher Ct‐values are taken into consideration, the sensitivity of Xpert increases up to 78.6%. Moreover, only three Xpert PCRs had to be repeated, whereas two Genomera were invalid even after repetition and further 15 GenomEra PCRs were repeated because of borderline results or inhibition of the PCR test. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, GenomEra assay performed with a higher sensitivity than the Xpert PCR. On the other hand, the Xpert assay needs less hands‐on‐time for a sample preparation and requires approximately four‐fold less repetitions as compared to the GenomEra assay. This robust performance of the Xpert assay make it applicable as a rapid intrapartum point‐of‐care test, although a higher sensitivity would be desirable. Therefore, culture in the 35–37 week of gestation remains the gold standard to detect vaginal colonization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10008276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100082762023-03-13 Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples Koliwer‐Brandl, Hendrik Nil, Ahmed Birri, Jana Sachs, Maike Zimmermann, Roland Zbinden, Reinhard Balsyte, Dalia Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Infections INTRODUCTION: Streptococcus agalactiae, also known as group B streptococci (GBS), is associated with invasive infections in neonates. Identification of GBS vaginal colonization in pregnant women before delivery is essential for treatment with antibiotics to prevent intrapartum vertical transmission to the newborn. This study was designed to evaluate applicability of two rapid real‐time PCRs in comparison to standard culture identification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared the Xpert GBS assay, hereafter referred to as Xpert, and GenomEra GBS PCR, hereafter referred to as GenomEra. The standard culture identification consisted of two different agar plates as well as an enrichment broth. RESULTS: We analyzed vaginal samples of 260 pregnant women; 42 samples were tested GBS‐positive by using standard culture as a gold standard, 30 by Xpert, and 37 by GenomEra. Xpert and GenomEra assays performed with sensitivities of 71.4% and 88.1% as well as specificities of 98.6% and 99.1%, respectively. Twelve vaginal samples were false‐negative by Xpert and five samples by GenomEra. Interestingly, three negative Xpert results of standard culture‐positive samples exhibited high Ct‐values indicating the presence of GBS. If higher Ct‐values are taken into consideration, the sensitivity of Xpert increases up to 78.6%. Moreover, only three Xpert PCRs had to be repeated, whereas two Genomera were invalid even after repetition and further 15 GenomEra PCRs were repeated because of borderline results or inhibition of the PCR test. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, GenomEra assay performed with a higher sensitivity than the Xpert PCR. On the other hand, the Xpert assay needs less hands‐on‐time for a sample preparation and requires approximately four‐fold less repetitions as compared to the GenomEra assay. This robust performance of the Xpert assay make it applicable as a rapid intrapartum point‐of‐care test, although a higher sensitivity would be desirable. Therefore, culture in the 35–37 week of gestation remains the gold standard to detect vaginal colonization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10008276/ /pubmed/36772902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14519 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Infections
Koliwer‐Brandl, Hendrik
Nil, Ahmed
Birri, Jana
Sachs, Maike
Zimmermann, Roland
Zbinden, Reinhard
Balsyte, Dalia
Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples
title Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples
title_full Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples
title_fullStr Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples
title_short Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples
title_sort evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples
topic Infections
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14519
work_keys_str_mv AT koliwerbrandlhendrik evaluationoftworapidcommercialassaysfordetectionofstreptococcusagalactiaefromvaginalsamples
AT nilahmed evaluationoftworapidcommercialassaysfordetectionofstreptococcusagalactiaefromvaginalsamples
AT birrijana evaluationoftworapidcommercialassaysfordetectionofstreptococcusagalactiaefromvaginalsamples
AT sachsmaike evaluationoftworapidcommercialassaysfordetectionofstreptococcusagalactiaefromvaginalsamples
AT zimmermannroland evaluationoftworapidcommercialassaysfordetectionofstreptococcusagalactiaefromvaginalsamples
AT zbindenreinhard evaluationoftworapidcommercialassaysfordetectionofstreptococcusagalactiaefromvaginalsamples
AT balsytedalia evaluationoftworapidcommercialassaysfordetectionofstreptococcusagalactiaefromvaginalsamples