Cargando…
Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: There is evidence for increased resistance against the antimicrobials used to treat keratitis. This review aims to provide global and regional prevalence estimates of antimicrobial resistance in corneal isolates and the range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) with their associ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36882242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069338 |
_version_ | 1784905736474591232 |
---|---|
author | Tuft, Stephen Evans, Jennifer Gordon, Iris Leck, Astrid Stone, Neil Neal, Timothy Macleod, David Kaye, Stephen Burton, Matthew J |
author_facet | Tuft, Stephen Evans, Jennifer Gordon, Iris Leck, Astrid Stone, Neil Neal, Timothy Macleod, David Kaye, Stephen Burton, Matthew J |
author_sort | Tuft, Stephen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is evidence for increased resistance against the antimicrobials used to treat keratitis. This review aims to provide global and regional prevalence estimates of antimicrobial resistance in corneal isolates and the range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) with their associated resistance breakpoints. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We report this protocol following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. We will conduct an electronic bibliographic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies will report in any language data for the resistance or MIC for antimicrobials against bacterial, fungal or amoebic organisms isolated from suspected microbial keratitis. Studies that only report on viral keratitis will not be included. There will be no time restrictions on the date of publication. Screening for eligible studies, assessment of risk of bias and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers independently, using predefined inclusion criteria and prepiloted data extraction forms. We will resolve disagreements between the reviewers by discussion and, if required, a third (senior) reviewer will arbitrate. We will assess the risk of bias using a tool validated in prevalence studies. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Pooled proportion estimates will be calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I(2) statistic. We will explore differences between Global Burden of Disease regions and temporal trends. ETHICS APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required as this is a protocol for a systematic review of published data. The findings of this review will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023331126. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10008341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100083412023-03-13 Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Tuft, Stephen Evans, Jennifer Gordon, Iris Leck, Astrid Stone, Neil Neal, Timothy Macleod, David Kaye, Stephen Burton, Matthew J BMJ Open Ophthalmology INTRODUCTION: There is evidence for increased resistance against the antimicrobials used to treat keratitis. This review aims to provide global and regional prevalence estimates of antimicrobial resistance in corneal isolates and the range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) with their associated resistance breakpoints. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We report this protocol following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. We will conduct an electronic bibliographic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies will report in any language data for the resistance or MIC for antimicrobials against bacterial, fungal or amoebic organisms isolated from suspected microbial keratitis. Studies that only report on viral keratitis will not be included. There will be no time restrictions on the date of publication. Screening for eligible studies, assessment of risk of bias and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers independently, using predefined inclusion criteria and prepiloted data extraction forms. We will resolve disagreements between the reviewers by discussion and, if required, a third (senior) reviewer will arbitrate. We will assess the risk of bias using a tool validated in prevalence studies. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Pooled proportion estimates will be calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I(2) statistic. We will explore differences between Global Burden of Disease regions and temporal trends. ETHICS APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required as this is a protocol for a systematic review of published data. The findings of this review will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023331126. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10008341/ /pubmed/36882242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069338 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Ophthalmology Tuft, Stephen Evans, Jennifer Gordon, Iris Leck, Astrid Stone, Neil Neal, Timothy Macleod, David Kaye, Stephen Burton, Matthew J Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Ophthalmology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36882242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069338 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuftstephen antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT evansjennifer antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gordoniris antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leckastrid antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stoneneil antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nealtimothy antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT macleoddavid antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kayestephen antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT burtonmatthewj antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |