Cargando…

Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: There is evidence for increased resistance against the antimicrobials used to treat keratitis. This review aims to provide global and regional prevalence estimates of antimicrobial resistance in corneal isolates and the range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) with their associ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuft, Stephen, Evans, Jennifer, Gordon, Iris, Leck, Astrid, Stone, Neil, Neal, Timothy, Macleod, David, Kaye, Stephen, Burton, Matthew J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36882242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069338
_version_ 1784905736474591232
author Tuft, Stephen
Evans, Jennifer
Gordon, Iris
Leck, Astrid
Stone, Neil
Neal, Timothy
Macleod, David
Kaye, Stephen
Burton, Matthew J
author_facet Tuft, Stephen
Evans, Jennifer
Gordon, Iris
Leck, Astrid
Stone, Neil
Neal, Timothy
Macleod, David
Kaye, Stephen
Burton, Matthew J
author_sort Tuft, Stephen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is evidence for increased resistance against the antimicrobials used to treat keratitis. This review aims to provide global and regional prevalence estimates of antimicrobial resistance in corneal isolates and the range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) with their associated resistance breakpoints. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We report this protocol following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. We will conduct an electronic bibliographic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies will report in any language data for the resistance or MIC for antimicrobials against bacterial, fungal or amoebic organisms isolated from suspected microbial keratitis. Studies that only report on viral keratitis will not be included. There will be no time restrictions on the date of publication. Screening for eligible studies, assessment of risk of bias and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers independently, using predefined inclusion criteria and prepiloted data extraction forms. We will resolve disagreements between the reviewers by discussion and, if required, a third (senior) reviewer will arbitrate. We will assess the risk of bias using a tool validated in prevalence studies. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Pooled proportion estimates will be calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I(2) statistic. We will explore differences between Global Burden of Disease regions and temporal trends. ETHICS APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required as this is a protocol for a systematic review of published data. The findings of this review will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023331126.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10008341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100083412023-03-13 Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Tuft, Stephen Evans, Jennifer Gordon, Iris Leck, Astrid Stone, Neil Neal, Timothy Macleod, David Kaye, Stephen Burton, Matthew J BMJ Open Ophthalmology INTRODUCTION: There is evidence for increased resistance against the antimicrobials used to treat keratitis. This review aims to provide global and regional prevalence estimates of antimicrobial resistance in corneal isolates and the range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) with their associated resistance breakpoints. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We report this protocol following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. We will conduct an electronic bibliographic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies will report in any language data for the resistance or MIC for antimicrobials against bacterial, fungal or amoebic organisms isolated from suspected microbial keratitis. Studies that only report on viral keratitis will not be included. There will be no time restrictions on the date of publication. Screening for eligible studies, assessment of risk of bias and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers independently, using predefined inclusion criteria and prepiloted data extraction forms. We will resolve disagreements between the reviewers by discussion and, if required, a third (senior) reviewer will arbitrate. We will assess the risk of bias using a tool validated in prevalence studies. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Pooled proportion estimates will be calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I(2) statistic. We will explore differences between Global Burden of Disease regions and temporal trends. ETHICS APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required as this is a protocol for a systematic review of published data. The findings of this review will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023331126. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10008341/ /pubmed/36882242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069338 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
Tuft, Stephen
Evans, Jennifer
Gordon, Iris
Leck, Astrid
Stone, Neil
Neal, Timothy
Macleod, David
Kaye, Stephen
Burton, Matthew J
Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Ophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36882242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069338
work_keys_str_mv AT tuftstephen antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT evansjennifer antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gordoniris antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leckastrid antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stoneneil antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nealtimothy antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT macleoddavid antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kayestephen antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT burtonmatthewj antimicrobialresistanceintopicaltreatmentsformicrobialkeratitisprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis