Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND: In China, diabetes has become a serious healthcare problem that plagues individuals and the government because of its high mortality rate and social burden, with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounting for the vast majority (about 90%) of cases. T2DM patients face a huge medication bu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mei, Yujin, Yang, Xue, Li, Yuqing, Zhang, Xiaoyun, Gui, Jiaofeng, Wang, Ying, Chen, Wenyue, Chen, Mingjia, Liu, Changjun, Zhang, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36919103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S398438
_version_ 1784905744516120576
author Mei, Yujin
Yang, Xue
Li, Yuqing
Zhang, Xiaoyun
Gui, Jiaofeng
Wang, Ying
Chen, Wenyue
Chen, Mingjia
Liu, Changjun
Zhang, Lin
author_facet Mei, Yujin
Yang, Xue
Li, Yuqing
Zhang, Xiaoyun
Gui, Jiaofeng
Wang, Ying
Chen, Wenyue
Chen, Mingjia
Liu, Changjun
Zhang, Lin
author_sort Mei, Yujin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In China, diabetes has become a serious healthcare problem that plagues individuals and the government because of its high mortality rate and social burden, with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounting for the vast majority (about 90%) of cases. T2DM patients face a huge medication burden and it is imperative to find appropriate tools to assess the medication burden for patients. This study aimed to translate the original Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) into Chinese and assessed the reliability and validity of the DTBQ concerning the burden of medication treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 329 T2DM patients were recruited to participate in the survey. The original version scale was first translated into Chinese using the backward and forward translation procedures. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was measured by the Cronbach alpha coefficient, the test-retest reliability, and the item-total correlation. The validity of the scale was assessed by the content validity index, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The content validity index of the scale was 0.920. Cronbach alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.831. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) supported a 15-item and 3-factor structure of the translated questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed in the model fitness index, the chi-square degree of freedom was 3.575, the incremental fit index (IFI) was 0.917, the comparative fit index(CFI) was 0.916, the Tucker Lewis Index(TLI) was 0.900, all within acceptable limits. The retest reliability was 0.892, and the corrected item-total correlations for the items ranged from 0.293 to 0.729. CONCLUSION: Verification results showed that the Chinese version of the 15-item DTBQ had reliable reliability and validity. Therefore, it can be considered as an appropriate tool to assess the burden of drug treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10008375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100083752023-03-13 Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mei, Yujin Yang, Xue Li, Yuqing Zhang, Xiaoyun Gui, Jiaofeng Wang, Ying Chen, Wenyue Chen, Mingjia Liu, Changjun Zhang, Lin Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research BACKGROUND: In China, diabetes has become a serious healthcare problem that plagues individuals and the government because of its high mortality rate and social burden, with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounting for the vast majority (about 90%) of cases. T2DM patients face a huge medication burden and it is imperative to find appropriate tools to assess the medication burden for patients. This study aimed to translate the original Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) into Chinese and assessed the reliability and validity of the DTBQ concerning the burden of medication treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 329 T2DM patients were recruited to participate in the survey. The original version scale was first translated into Chinese using the backward and forward translation procedures. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was measured by the Cronbach alpha coefficient, the test-retest reliability, and the item-total correlation. The validity of the scale was assessed by the content validity index, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The content validity index of the scale was 0.920. Cronbach alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.831. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) supported a 15-item and 3-factor structure of the translated questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed in the model fitness index, the chi-square degree of freedom was 3.575, the incremental fit index (IFI) was 0.917, the comparative fit index(CFI) was 0.916, the Tucker Lewis Index(TLI) was 0.900, all within acceptable limits. The retest reliability was 0.892, and the corrected item-total correlations for the items ranged from 0.293 to 0.729. CONCLUSION: Verification results showed that the Chinese version of the 15-item DTBQ had reliable reliability and validity. Therefore, it can be considered as an appropriate tool to assess the burden of drug treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Dove 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10008375/ /pubmed/36919103 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S398438 Text en © 2023 Mei et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Mei, Yujin
Yang, Xue
Li, Yuqing
Zhang, Xiaoyun
Gui, Jiaofeng
Wang, Ying
Chen, Wenyue
Chen, Mingjia
Liu, Changjun
Zhang, Lin
Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
title Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
title_full Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
title_short Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ) Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
title_sort validity and reliability of the chinese version of the diabetes treatment burden questionnaire (dtbq) among patients with type 2 diabetes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36919103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S398438
work_keys_str_mv AT meiyujin validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT yangxue validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT liyuqing validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT zhangxiaoyun validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT guijiaofeng validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT wangying validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT chenwenyue validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT chenmingjia validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT liuchangjun validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes
AT zhanglin validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthediabetestreatmentburdenquestionnairedtbqamongpatientswithtype2diabetes