Cargando…

Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment

PURPOSE: To assess the readability and accountability of online patient education materials related to glaucoma diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We conducted a Google search for 10 search terms related to glaucoma diagnosis and 10 search terms related to glaucoma treatment. For each search term, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen, Samuel A, Fisher, Ann Caroline, Pershing, Suzann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923248
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S401492
_version_ 1784905823224332288
author Cohen, Samuel A
Fisher, Ann Caroline
Pershing, Suzann
author_facet Cohen, Samuel A
Fisher, Ann Caroline
Pershing, Suzann
author_sort Cohen, Samuel A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the readability and accountability of online patient education materials related to glaucoma diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We conducted a Google search for 10 search terms related to glaucoma diagnosis and 10 search terms related to glaucoma treatment. For each search term, the first 10 patient education websites populated after Google search were assessed for readability and accountability. Readability was assessed using five validated measures: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and New Dale-Chall (NDC). Accountability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmarks. The source of information for each article analyzed was recorded. RESULTS: Of the 200 total websites analyzed, only 11% were written at or below the recommended 6th grade reading level. The average FRE and grade level for 100 glaucoma diagnosis-related articles were 42.02 ± 1.08 and 10.53 ± 1.30, respectively. The average FRE and grade level for 100 glaucoma treatment-related articles were 43.86 ± 1.01 and 11.29 ± 1.54, respectively. Crowdsourced articles were written at the highest average grade level (12.32 ± 0.78), followed by articles written by private practice/independent users (11.22 ± 1.74), national organizations (10.92 ± 1.24), and educational institutions (10.33 ± 1.35). Websites averaged 1.12 ± 1.15 of 4 JAMA accountability metrics. CONCLUSION: Despite wide variation in the readability and accountability of online patient education materials related to glaucoma diagnosis and treatment, patient education materials are consistently written at levels above the recommended reading level and often lack accountability. Articles from educational institutions and national organizations were often written at lower reading levels but are less frequently encountered after Google search. There is a need for accurate and understandable online information that glaucoma patients can use to inform decisions about their eye health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10008728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100087282023-03-14 Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment Cohen, Samuel A Fisher, Ann Caroline Pershing, Suzann Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To assess the readability and accountability of online patient education materials related to glaucoma diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We conducted a Google search for 10 search terms related to glaucoma diagnosis and 10 search terms related to glaucoma treatment. For each search term, the first 10 patient education websites populated after Google search were assessed for readability and accountability. Readability was assessed using five validated measures: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and New Dale-Chall (NDC). Accountability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmarks. The source of information for each article analyzed was recorded. RESULTS: Of the 200 total websites analyzed, only 11% were written at or below the recommended 6th grade reading level. The average FRE and grade level for 100 glaucoma diagnosis-related articles were 42.02 ± 1.08 and 10.53 ± 1.30, respectively. The average FRE and grade level for 100 glaucoma treatment-related articles were 43.86 ± 1.01 and 11.29 ± 1.54, respectively. Crowdsourced articles were written at the highest average grade level (12.32 ± 0.78), followed by articles written by private practice/independent users (11.22 ± 1.74), national organizations (10.92 ± 1.24), and educational institutions (10.33 ± 1.35). Websites averaged 1.12 ± 1.15 of 4 JAMA accountability metrics. CONCLUSION: Despite wide variation in the readability and accountability of online patient education materials related to glaucoma diagnosis and treatment, patient education materials are consistently written at levels above the recommended reading level and often lack accountability. Articles from educational institutions and national organizations were often written at lower reading levels but are less frequently encountered after Google search. There is a need for accurate and understandable online information that glaucoma patients can use to inform decisions about their eye health. Dove 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10008728/ /pubmed/36923248 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S401492 Text en © 2023 Cohen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Cohen, Samuel A
Fisher, Ann Caroline
Pershing, Suzann
Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
title Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
title_full Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
title_fullStr Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
title_short Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
title_sort analysis of the readability and accountability of online patient education materials related to glaucoma diagnosis and treatment
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923248
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S401492
work_keys_str_mv AT cohensamuela analysisofthereadabilityandaccountabilityofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsrelatedtoglaucomadiagnosisandtreatment
AT fisheranncaroline analysisofthereadabilityandaccountabilityofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsrelatedtoglaucomadiagnosisandtreatment
AT pershingsuzann analysisofthereadabilityandaccountabilityofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsrelatedtoglaucomadiagnosisandtreatment