Cargando…

Comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma

AIM: This study was to analyze and compare the predictive performance of the 7th and the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N staging system, lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph node (LODDS) for the survival of patients with ampullary carcinomas (ACs). METHOD: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xun, Chen, Lin, Li, Junli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1002411
_version_ 1784905857214971904
author Li, Xun
Chen, Lin
Li, Junli
author_facet Li, Xun
Chen, Lin
Li, Junli
author_sort Li, Xun
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study was to analyze and compare the predictive performance of the 7th and the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N staging system, lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph node (LODDS) for the survival of patients with ampullary carcinomas (ACs). METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included patients with primary ACs after surgery from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2004–2015. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used. The study population was divided into a training set and a testing set in a ratio of 7–3. The C-index and area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare the predictive performance of the four staging on overall survival (OS) in the training set and the testing set. RESULTS: A total of 7,480 patients with primary ACs (1,178 survived and 1,128 dead) were in this study. The average follow-up time was 41.1 months. N1 stage and N2 stage of the 8th edition AJCC N staging system, LNR staging (0–0.3), LNR (>0.3), LODDS (−2.4 to −0.8) and LODDS (>−0.8) were associated with OS in AC patients after adjusting for age, race, pT stage, tumor size, grade, radiation, and insurance. The C-index of the 7th AJCC N staging was significantly lower than the C-index of the 8th AJCC N staging in the training set [0.608 vs. 0.629, P < 0.001] and testing set [0.635 vs. 0.658, P < 0.001]. The C-index of the LODDS staging was significantly higher than the C-index of the 8th AJCC N staging in the training set [0.641 vs. 0.629, P = 0.034] and testing set [0.671 vs. 0.658, P = 0.034]. LODDS staging may be a potential predictor of OS at 6 months [AUC = 0.687], 12 months (AUC = 0.692), and 48 months (AUC = 0.709), and LNR staging (AUC = 0.655) may be a potential predictor of OS at 24 months in AC patients. The predictive ability of LNR staging and LODDS staging were also found in different subgroups. CONCLUSION: The LNR and LODDS staging systems' predictive performance for OS of AC patients were superior to the 8th edition AJCC N staging system, especially in patients ages ≥65 or with higher tumor grade (grade II and III). The LNR staging and the LODDS staging were potential predictors for 24-month OS, and 6, 12, 24 and 48-month OS, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10008877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100088772023-03-14 Comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma Li, Xun Chen, Lin Li, Junli Front Surg Surgery AIM: This study was to analyze and compare the predictive performance of the 7th and the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N staging system, lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph node (LODDS) for the survival of patients with ampullary carcinomas (ACs). METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included patients with primary ACs after surgery from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2004–2015. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used. The study population was divided into a training set and a testing set in a ratio of 7–3. The C-index and area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare the predictive performance of the four staging on overall survival (OS) in the training set and the testing set. RESULTS: A total of 7,480 patients with primary ACs (1,178 survived and 1,128 dead) were in this study. The average follow-up time was 41.1 months. N1 stage and N2 stage of the 8th edition AJCC N staging system, LNR staging (0–0.3), LNR (>0.3), LODDS (−2.4 to −0.8) and LODDS (>−0.8) were associated with OS in AC patients after adjusting for age, race, pT stage, tumor size, grade, radiation, and insurance. The C-index of the 7th AJCC N staging was significantly lower than the C-index of the 8th AJCC N staging in the training set [0.608 vs. 0.629, P < 0.001] and testing set [0.635 vs. 0.658, P < 0.001]. The C-index of the LODDS staging was significantly higher than the C-index of the 8th AJCC N staging in the training set [0.641 vs. 0.629, P = 0.034] and testing set [0.671 vs. 0.658, P = 0.034]. LODDS staging may be a potential predictor of OS at 6 months [AUC = 0.687], 12 months (AUC = 0.692), and 48 months (AUC = 0.709), and LNR staging (AUC = 0.655) may be a potential predictor of OS at 24 months in AC patients. The predictive ability of LNR staging and LODDS staging were also found in different subgroups. CONCLUSION: The LNR and LODDS staging systems' predictive performance for OS of AC patients were superior to the 8th edition AJCC N staging system, especially in patients ages ≥65 or with higher tumor grade (grade II and III). The LNR staging and the LODDS staging were potential predictors for 24-month OS, and 6, 12, 24 and 48-month OS, respectively. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10008877/ /pubmed/36923383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1002411 Text en © 2023 Li, Chen and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Li, Xun
Chen, Lin
Li, Junli
Comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma
title Comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma
title_full Comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma
title_short Comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma
title_sort comparing the predictive performance of different lymph node staging systems for postoperative overall survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1002411
work_keys_str_mv AT lixun comparingthepredictiveperformanceofdifferentlymphnodestagingsystemsforpostoperativeoverallsurvivalinpatientswithampullarycarcinoma
AT chenlin comparingthepredictiveperformanceofdifferentlymphnodestagingsystemsforpostoperativeoverallsurvivalinpatientswithampullarycarcinoma
AT lijunli comparingthepredictiveperformanceofdifferentlymphnodestagingsystemsforpostoperativeoverallsurvivalinpatientswithampullarycarcinoma