Cargando…

A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data

OBJECTIVE: The timeline followback (TLFB) interview is the gold standard for the quantitative assessment of alcohol use. However, self-reported “drinks” can vary in alcohol content. If this variability is not accounted for, it can compromise the reliability and validity of TLFB data. To improve the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marini, Christina, Northover, Nicole S, Gold, Noah D, Rogers, Ursula K, O’Donnell, Kelley C, Tofighi, Babak, Ross, Stephen, Bogenschutz, Michael P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11782218231157558
_version_ 1784905890044837888
author Marini, Christina
Northover, Nicole S
Gold, Noah D
Rogers, Ursula K
O’Donnell, Kelley C
Tofighi, Babak
Ross, Stephen
Bogenschutz, Michael P
author_facet Marini, Christina
Northover, Nicole S
Gold, Noah D
Rogers, Ursula K
O’Donnell, Kelley C
Tofighi, Babak
Ross, Stephen
Bogenschutz, Michael P
author_sort Marini, Christina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The timeline followback (TLFB) interview is the gold standard for the quantitative assessment of alcohol use. However, self-reported “drinks” can vary in alcohol content. If this variability is not accounted for, it can compromise the reliability and validity of TLFB data. To improve the precision of the TLFB data, we developed a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to calculate standard drinks more accurately from participant reports. METHOD: For the new SOP, the volume and alcohol content by volume (ABV) of distinct types of alcoholic beverages were determined based on product websites and other reliable sources. Recipes for specific cocktails were constructed based on recipes from bartending education websites. One standard drink was defined as 0.6 oz (14 g) of absolute alcohol. Standard drink totals were contrasted for the new SOP approach and the standard procedure, which generally assumed that one self-reported drink was equivalent to one standard drink. RESULTS: Relative to the standard TLFB procedure, higher numbers of standard drinks were reported after implementing the TLFB SOP. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in procedures for conversion of self-reported alcohol consumption to standard drinks can confound the interpretation of TLFB data. The use and reporting of a detailed SOP can significantly reduce the potential for such inconsistencies. Detailed and consistent procedures for calculation of standard drinks can enhance the quality of TLFB drinking data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10009017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100090172023-03-14 A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data Marini, Christina Northover, Nicole S Gold, Noah D Rogers, Ursula K O’Donnell, Kelley C Tofighi, Babak Ross, Stephen Bogenschutz, Michael P Subst Abuse Methodology OBJECTIVE: The timeline followback (TLFB) interview is the gold standard for the quantitative assessment of alcohol use. However, self-reported “drinks” can vary in alcohol content. If this variability is not accounted for, it can compromise the reliability and validity of TLFB data. To improve the precision of the TLFB data, we developed a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to calculate standard drinks more accurately from participant reports. METHOD: For the new SOP, the volume and alcohol content by volume (ABV) of distinct types of alcoholic beverages were determined based on product websites and other reliable sources. Recipes for specific cocktails were constructed based on recipes from bartending education websites. One standard drink was defined as 0.6 oz (14 g) of absolute alcohol. Standard drink totals were contrasted for the new SOP approach and the standard procedure, which generally assumed that one self-reported drink was equivalent to one standard drink. RESULTS: Relative to the standard TLFB procedure, higher numbers of standard drinks were reported after implementing the TLFB SOP. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in procedures for conversion of self-reported alcohol consumption to standard drinks can confound the interpretation of TLFB data. The use and reporting of a detailed SOP can significantly reduce the potential for such inconsistencies. Detailed and consistent procedures for calculation of standard drinks can enhance the quality of TLFB drinking data. SAGE Publications 2023-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10009017/ /pubmed/36923069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11782218231157558 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Methodology
Marini, Christina
Northover, Nicole S
Gold, Noah D
Rogers, Ursula K
O’Donnell, Kelley C
Tofighi, Babak
Ross, Stephen
Bogenschutz, Michael P
A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data
title A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data
title_full A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data
title_fullStr A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data
title_short A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data
title_sort systematic approach to standardizing drinking outcomes from timeline followback data
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11782218231157558
work_keys_str_mv AT marinichristina asystematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT northovernicoles asystematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT goldnoahd asystematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT rogersursulak asystematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT odonnellkelleyc asystematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT tofighibabak asystematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT rossstephen asystematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT bogenschutzmichaelp asystematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT marinichristina systematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT northovernicoles systematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT goldnoahd systematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT rogersursulak systematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT odonnellkelleyc systematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT tofighibabak systematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT rossstephen systematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata
AT bogenschutzmichaelp systematicapproachtostandardizingdrinkingoutcomesfromtimelinefollowbackdata