Cargando…

Perspectives on Self-Sampling for Cancer Screening From Staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural and Segregated Counties: A Preliminary Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: Self-sampling for colorectal and cervical cancer screening can address the observed geographic disparities in cancer burden by alleviating barriers to screening participation, such as access to primary care. This preliminary study examines qualitative themes regarding cervical and colore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Jayme, Stoltzfus, Kelsey C., Popalis, Madyson, Moss, Jennifer L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221102819
_version_ 1784905891834757120
author Wood, Jayme
Stoltzfus, Kelsey C.
Popalis, Madyson
Moss, Jennifer L.
author_facet Wood, Jayme
Stoltzfus, Kelsey C.
Popalis, Madyson
Moss, Jennifer L.
author_sort Wood, Jayme
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-sampling for colorectal and cervical cancer screening can address the observed geographic disparities in cancer burden by alleviating barriers to screening participation, such as access to primary care. This preliminary study examines qualitative themes regarding cervical and colorectal cancer self-sampling screening tools among federally qualified health center clinical and administrative staff in underserved communities. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with clinical or administrative employees (≥18 years of age) from FQHCs in rural and racially segregated counties in Pennsylvania. Data were managed and analyzed using QSR NVivo 12. Content analysis was used to identify themes about attitudes towards self-sampling for cancer screening. RESULTS: Eight interviews were conducted. Average participant age was 42 years old and 88% of participants were female. Participants indicated that a shared advantage for both colorectal and cervical cancer self-sampling tests was their potential to increase screening rates by simplifying the screening process and offering an alternative to those who decline traditional screening. A shared disadvantage to self-sampling was the potential for inaccurate sample collection, either through the test itself or the sample collection by the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Self-sampling offers a promising solution to increase cervical and colorectal cancer screening in rural and racially segregated communities. This study’s findings can guide future research and interventions which integrate self-sampling screening into routine primary care practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10009024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100090242023-03-14 Perspectives on Self-Sampling for Cancer Screening From Staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural and Segregated Counties: A Preliminary Qualitative Study Wood, Jayme Stoltzfus, Kelsey C. Popalis, Madyson Moss, Jennifer L. Cancer Control Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Self-sampling for colorectal and cervical cancer screening can address the observed geographic disparities in cancer burden by alleviating barriers to screening participation, such as access to primary care. This preliminary study examines qualitative themes regarding cervical and colorectal cancer self-sampling screening tools among federally qualified health center clinical and administrative staff in underserved communities. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with clinical or administrative employees (≥18 years of age) from FQHCs in rural and racially segregated counties in Pennsylvania. Data were managed and analyzed using QSR NVivo 12. Content analysis was used to identify themes about attitudes towards self-sampling for cancer screening. RESULTS: Eight interviews were conducted. Average participant age was 42 years old and 88% of participants were female. Participants indicated that a shared advantage for both colorectal and cervical cancer self-sampling tests was their potential to increase screening rates by simplifying the screening process and offering an alternative to those who decline traditional screening. A shared disadvantage to self-sampling was the potential for inaccurate sample collection, either through the test itself or the sample collection by the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Self-sampling offers a promising solution to increase cervical and colorectal cancer screening in rural and racially segregated communities. This study’s findings can guide future research and interventions which integrate self-sampling screening into routine primary care practice. SAGE Publications 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10009024/ /pubmed/36895165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221102819 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Wood, Jayme
Stoltzfus, Kelsey C.
Popalis, Madyson
Moss, Jennifer L.
Perspectives on Self-Sampling for Cancer Screening From Staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural and Segregated Counties: A Preliminary Qualitative Study
title Perspectives on Self-Sampling for Cancer Screening From Staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural and Segregated Counties: A Preliminary Qualitative Study
title_full Perspectives on Self-Sampling for Cancer Screening From Staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural and Segregated Counties: A Preliminary Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Perspectives on Self-Sampling for Cancer Screening From Staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural and Segregated Counties: A Preliminary Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on Self-Sampling for Cancer Screening From Staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural and Segregated Counties: A Preliminary Qualitative Study
title_short Perspectives on Self-Sampling for Cancer Screening From Staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural and Segregated Counties: A Preliminary Qualitative Study
title_sort perspectives on self-sampling for cancer screening from staff at federally qualified health centers in rural and segregated counties: a preliminary qualitative study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221102819
work_keys_str_mv AT woodjayme perspectivesonselfsamplingforcancerscreeningfromstaffatfederallyqualifiedhealthcentersinruralandsegregatedcountiesapreliminaryqualitativestudy
AT stoltzfuskelseyc perspectivesonselfsamplingforcancerscreeningfromstaffatfederallyqualifiedhealthcentersinruralandsegregatedcountiesapreliminaryqualitativestudy
AT popalismadyson perspectivesonselfsamplingforcancerscreeningfromstaffatfederallyqualifiedhealthcentersinruralandsegregatedcountiesapreliminaryqualitativestudy
AT mossjenniferl perspectivesonselfsamplingforcancerscreeningfromstaffatfederallyqualifiedhealthcentersinruralandsegregatedcountiesapreliminaryqualitativestudy