Cargando…

Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This systematic review examined healthcare students' attitudes, knowledge, and skill in Artificial Intelligence (AI). METHODS: On August 3, 2022, studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh, Sarbaz, Masoumeh, Ghaddaripouri, Kosar, Ghaddaripouri, Maryam, Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat, Kimiafar, Khalil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1138
_version_ 1784905955244244992
author Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
Sarbaz, Masoumeh
Ghaddaripouri, Kosar
Ghaddaripouri, Maryam
Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat
Kimiafar, Khalil
author_facet Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
Sarbaz, Masoumeh
Ghaddaripouri, Kosar
Ghaddaripouri, Maryam
Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat
Kimiafar, Khalil
author_sort Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This systematic review examined healthcare students' attitudes, knowledge, and skill in Artificial Intelligence (AI). METHODS: On August 3, 2022, studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses recommendations were followed. We included cross‐sectional studies that examined healthcare students' knowledge, attitudes, skills, and perceptions of AI in this review. Using the eligibility requirements as a guide, titles and abstracts were screened. Complete texts were then retrieved and independently reviewed per the eligibility requirements. To collect data, a standardized form was used. RESULTS: Of the 38 included studies, 29 (76%) of healthcare students had a positive and promising attitude towards AI in the clinical profession and its use in he future; however, in nine of the studies (24%), students considered AI a threat to healthcare fields and had a negative attitude towards it. Furthermore, 26 studies evaluated the knowledge of healthcare students about AI. Among these, 18 studies evaluated the level of student knowledge as low (50%). On the other hand, in six of the studies, students' high knowledge of AI was reported, and two of the studies reported average student general knowledge (almost 50%). Of the six studies, four (67%) of the students had very low skills, so they stated that they had never worked with AI. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review shows that healthcare students had a positive and promising attitude towards AI in medicine; however, most students had low knowledge and limited skills in working with AI. Face‐to‐face instruction, training manuals, and detailed instructions are therefore crucial for implementing and comprehending how AI technology works and raising students' knowledge of the advantages of AI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10009305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100093052023-03-14 Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: A systematic review Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh Sarbaz, Masoumeh Ghaddaripouri, Kosar Ghaddaripouri, Maryam Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat Kimiafar, Khalil Health Sci Rep Narrative Review BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This systematic review examined healthcare students' attitudes, knowledge, and skill in Artificial Intelligence (AI). METHODS: On August 3, 2022, studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses recommendations were followed. We included cross‐sectional studies that examined healthcare students' knowledge, attitudes, skills, and perceptions of AI in this review. Using the eligibility requirements as a guide, titles and abstracts were screened. Complete texts were then retrieved and independently reviewed per the eligibility requirements. To collect data, a standardized form was used. RESULTS: Of the 38 included studies, 29 (76%) of healthcare students had a positive and promising attitude towards AI in the clinical profession and its use in he future; however, in nine of the studies (24%), students considered AI a threat to healthcare fields and had a negative attitude towards it. Furthermore, 26 studies evaluated the knowledge of healthcare students about AI. Among these, 18 studies evaluated the level of student knowledge as low (50%). On the other hand, in six of the studies, students' high knowledge of AI was reported, and two of the studies reported average student general knowledge (almost 50%). Of the six studies, four (67%) of the students had very low skills, so they stated that they had never worked with AI. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review shows that healthcare students had a positive and promising attitude towards AI in medicine; however, most students had low knowledge and limited skills in working with AI. Face‐to‐face instruction, training manuals, and detailed instructions are therefore crucial for implementing and comprehending how AI technology works and raising students' knowledge of the advantages of AI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10009305/ /pubmed/36923372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1138 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Narrative Review
Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
Sarbaz, Masoumeh
Ghaddaripouri, Kosar
Ghaddaripouri, Maryam
Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat
Kimiafar, Khalil
Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: A systematic review
title Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: A systematic review
title_full Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: A systematic review
title_fullStr Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: A systematic review
title_short Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: A systematic review
title_sort attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: a systematic review
topic Narrative Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1138
work_keys_str_mv AT mousavibaigiseyyedehfatemeh attitudesknowledgeandskillstowardsartificialintelligenceamonghealthcarestudentsasystematicreview
AT sarbazmasoumeh attitudesknowledgeandskillstowardsartificialintelligenceamonghealthcarestudentsasystematicreview
AT ghaddaripourikosar attitudesknowledgeandskillstowardsartificialintelligenceamonghealthcarestudentsasystematicreview
AT ghaddaripourimaryam attitudesknowledgeandskillstowardsartificialintelligenceamonghealthcarestudentsasystematicreview
AT mousaviatefehsadat attitudesknowledgeandskillstowardsartificialintelligenceamonghealthcarestudentsasystematicreview
AT kimiafarkhalil attitudesknowledgeandskillstowardsartificialintelligenceamonghealthcarestudentsasystematicreview