Federalism’s Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law

Amid undulating conceptions of the role and prowess of federalism emerges its central constitutional role: protecting American liberties against unwarranted governmental intrusions. To the extent that federalism is used as a guise for withdrawing fundamental rights to abortion by the U.S. Supreme Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hodge, James G., Ghaith, Summer, Krumholz, Lauren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Columns: Public Health and the Law
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.26
_version_ 1784905970177015808
author Hodge, James G.
Ghaith, Summer
Krumholz, Lauren
author_facet Hodge, James G.
Ghaith, Summer
Krumholz, Lauren
author_sort Hodge, James G.
collection PubMed
description Amid undulating conceptions of the role and prowess of federalism emerges its central constitutional role: protecting American liberties against unwarranted governmental intrusions. To the extent that federalism is used as a guise for withdrawing fundamental rights to abortion by the U.S. Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, individual rights are sacrificed in contravention of constitutional structural norms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10009372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100093722023-03-14 Federalism’s Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law Hodge, James G. Ghaith, Summer Krumholz, Lauren J Law Med Ethics Columns: Public Health and the Law Amid undulating conceptions of the role and prowess of federalism emerges its central constitutional role: protecting American liberties against unwarranted governmental intrusions. To the extent that federalism is used as a guise for withdrawing fundamental rights to abortion by the U.S. Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, individual rights are sacrificed in contravention of constitutional structural norms. Cambridge University Press 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC10009372/ /pubmed/36883407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.26 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Columns: Public Health and the Law
Hodge, James G.
Ghaith, Summer
Krumholz, Lauren
Federalism’s Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law
title Federalism’s Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law
title_full Federalism’s Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law
title_fullStr Federalism’s Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law
title_full_unstemmed Federalism’s Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law
title_short Federalism’s Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law
title_sort federalism’s fallacy at the forefront of public health law
topic Columns: Public Health and the Law
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.26
work_keys_str_mv AT hodgejamesg federalismsfallacyattheforefrontofpublichealthlaw
AT ghaithsummer federalismsfallacyattheforefrontofpublichealthlaw
AT krumholzlauren federalismsfallacyattheforefrontofpublichealthlaw

Ejemplares similares