Why Govern Broken Tools?

In Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study, Brian Hutler et al. ably compare two approaches to the governance of digital contract tracing (DCT).(1) In this brief essay, I want to examine to what extent governance actually played...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Calo, Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Independent Articles: Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.21
_version_ 1784905974998368256
author Calo, Ryan
author_facet Calo, Ryan
author_sort Calo, Ryan
collection PubMed
description In Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study, Brian Hutler et al. ably compare two approaches to the governance of digital contract tracing (DCT).(1) In this brief essay, I want to examine to what extent governance actually played a meaningful role in the failure of DCT. If DCT failed primarily for other reasons, then the authors’ normative suggestion to pursue “a new governance approach … for designing and implementing DCT technology going forward” may be misplaced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10009392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100093922023-03-14 Why Govern Broken Tools? Calo, Ryan J Law Med Ethics Independent Articles: Commentary In Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study, Brian Hutler et al. ably compare two approaches to the governance of digital contract tracing (DCT).(1) In this brief essay, I want to examine to what extent governance actually played a meaningful role in the failure of DCT. If DCT failed primarily for other reasons, then the authors’ normative suggestion to pursue “a new governance approach … for designing and implementing DCT technology going forward” may be misplaced. Cambridge University Press 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC10009392/ /pubmed/36883394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.21 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Independent Articles: Commentary
Calo, Ryan
Why Govern Broken Tools?
title Why Govern Broken Tools?
title_full Why Govern Broken Tools?
title_fullStr Why Govern Broken Tools?
title_full_unstemmed Why Govern Broken Tools?
title_short Why Govern Broken Tools?
title_sort why govern broken tools?
topic Independent Articles: Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.21
work_keys_str_mv AT caloryan whygovernbrokentools

Ejemplares similares