Cargando…
Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey
BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health significantly affect health outcomes, yet are infrequently addressed in prenatal care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to improve the efficiency and experience of addressing social needs in pregnancy through: (1) testing a digital short-form screening tool; and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36922957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100158 |
_version_ | 1784906005226717184 |
---|---|
author | Peahl, Alex F. Rubin-Miller, Lily Paterson, Victoria Jahnke, Hannah R. Plough, Avery Henrich, Natalie Moss, Christa Shah, Neel |
author_facet | Peahl, Alex F. Rubin-Miller, Lily Paterson, Victoria Jahnke, Hannah R. Plough, Avery Henrich, Natalie Moss, Christa Shah, Neel |
author_sort | Peahl, Alex F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health significantly affect health outcomes, yet are infrequently addressed in prenatal care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to improve the efficiency and experience of addressing social needs in pregnancy through: (1) testing a digital short-form screening tool; and (2) characterizing pregnant people's preferences for social needs screening and management. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool from PRAPARE (Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risks, and Experiences), and a survey to query patients’ preferences for addressing social needs. Instruments were administered online to peripartum participants, with equal representation of patients with public and private insurance. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the short-form tool vs PRAPARE. Quantitative responses were characterized using descriptive statistics. Free-text responses were analyzed with matrix and thematic coding. Survey data were analyzed by subgroups of historically marginalized populations. RESULTS: A total of 215 people completed the survey. Participants were predominantly White (167; 77.7%) and multiparous (145; 67.4%). Unmet social needs were prevalent with both the short-form tool (77.7%) and PRAPARE (96.7%). The sensitivity (79.3%) and specificity (71.4%) of the short-form screener were high for detecting any social need. Most participants believed that it was important for their pregnancy care team to know their social needs (material: 173, 80.5%; support: 200, 93.0%), and over half felt comfortable sharing their needs through in-person or digital modalities if assistance was or was not available (material: 117, 54.4%; support: 122, 56.7%). Free-text themes reflected considerations for integrating social needs in routine prenatal care. Acceptability of addressing social needs in pregnancy was high among all groups. CONCLUSION: A digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool performs well when compared with the gold standard. Pregnant people accept social needs as a part of routine pregnancy care. Future work is needed to operationalize efficient, effective, patient-centered approaches to addressing social needs in pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10009524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100095242023-03-14 Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey Peahl, Alex F. Rubin-Miller, Lily Paterson, Victoria Jahnke, Hannah R. Plough, Avery Henrich, Natalie Moss, Christa Shah, Neel AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health significantly affect health outcomes, yet are infrequently addressed in prenatal care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to improve the efficiency and experience of addressing social needs in pregnancy through: (1) testing a digital short-form screening tool; and (2) characterizing pregnant people's preferences for social needs screening and management. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool from PRAPARE (Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risks, and Experiences), and a survey to query patients’ preferences for addressing social needs. Instruments were administered online to peripartum participants, with equal representation of patients with public and private insurance. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the short-form tool vs PRAPARE. Quantitative responses were characterized using descriptive statistics. Free-text responses were analyzed with matrix and thematic coding. Survey data were analyzed by subgroups of historically marginalized populations. RESULTS: A total of 215 people completed the survey. Participants were predominantly White (167; 77.7%) and multiparous (145; 67.4%). Unmet social needs were prevalent with both the short-form tool (77.7%) and PRAPARE (96.7%). The sensitivity (79.3%) and specificity (71.4%) of the short-form screener were high for detecting any social need. Most participants believed that it was important for their pregnancy care team to know their social needs (material: 173, 80.5%; support: 200, 93.0%), and over half felt comfortable sharing their needs through in-person or digital modalities if assistance was or was not available (material: 117, 54.4%; support: 122, 56.7%). Free-text themes reflected considerations for integrating social needs in routine prenatal care. Acceptability of addressing social needs in pregnancy was high among all groups. CONCLUSION: A digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool performs well when compared with the gold standard. Pregnant people accept social needs as a part of routine pregnancy care. Future work is needed to operationalize efficient, effective, patient-centered approaches to addressing social needs in pregnancy. Elsevier 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10009524/ /pubmed/36922957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100158 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Peahl, Alex F. Rubin-Miller, Lily Paterson, Victoria Jahnke, Hannah R. Plough, Avery Henrich, Natalie Moss, Christa Shah, Neel Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey |
title | Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey |
title_full | Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey |
title_fullStr | Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey |
title_short | Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey |
title_sort | understanding social needs in pregnancy: prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36922957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peahlalexf understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey AT rubinmillerlily understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey AT patersonvictoria understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey AT jahnkehannahr understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey AT ploughavery understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey AT henrichnatalie understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey AT mosschrista understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey AT shahneel understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey |