Cargando…

Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health significantly affect health outcomes, yet are infrequently addressed in prenatal care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to improve the efficiency and experience of addressing social needs in pregnancy through: (1) testing a digital short-form screening tool; and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peahl, Alex F., Rubin-Miller, Lily, Paterson, Victoria, Jahnke, Hannah R., Plough, Avery, Henrich, Natalie, Moss, Christa, Shah, Neel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36922957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100158
_version_ 1784906005226717184
author Peahl, Alex F.
Rubin-Miller, Lily
Paterson, Victoria
Jahnke, Hannah R.
Plough, Avery
Henrich, Natalie
Moss, Christa
Shah, Neel
author_facet Peahl, Alex F.
Rubin-Miller, Lily
Paterson, Victoria
Jahnke, Hannah R.
Plough, Avery
Henrich, Natalie
Moss, Christa
Shah, Neel
author_sort Peahl, Alex F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health significantly affect health outcomes, yet are infrequently addressed in prenatal care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to improve the efficiency and experience of addressing social needs in pregnancy through: (1) testing a digital short-form screening tool; and (2) characterizing pregnant people's preferences for social needs screening and management. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool from PRAPARE (Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risks, and Experiences), and a survey to query patients’ preferences for addressing social needs. Instruments were administered online to peripartum participants, with equal representation of patients with public and private insurance. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the short-form tool vs PRAPARE. Quantitative responses were characterized using descriptive statistics. Free-text responses were analyzed with matrix and thematic coding. Survey data were analyzed by subgroups of historically marginalized populations. RESULTS: A total of 215 people completed the survey. Participants were predominantly White (167; 77.7%) and multiparous (145; 67.4%). Unmet social needs were prevalent with both the short-form tool (77.7%) and PRAPARE (96.7%). The sensitivity (79.3%) and specificity (71.4%) of the short-form screener were high for detecting any social need. Most participants believed that it was important for their pregnancy care team to know their social needs (material: 173, 80.5%; support: 200, 93.0%), and over half felt comfortable sharing their needs through in-person or digital modalities if assistance was or was not available (material: 117, 54.4%; support: 122, 56.7%). Free-text themes reflected considerations for integrating social needs in routine prenatal care. Acceptability of addressing social needs in pregnancy was high among all groups. CONCLUSION: A digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool performs well when compared with the gold standard. Pregnant people accept social needs as a part of routine pregnancy care. Future work is needed to operationalize efficient, effective, patient-centered approaches to addressing social needs in pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10009524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100095242023-03-14 Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey Peahl, Alex F. Rubin-Miller, Lily Paterson, Victoria Jahnke, Hannah R. Plough, Avery Henrich, Natalie Moss, Christa Shah, Neel AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health significantly affect health outcomes, yet are infrequently addressed in prenatal care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to improve the efficiency and experience of addressing social needs in pregnancy through: (1) testing a digital short-form screening tool; and (2) characterizing pregnant people's preferences for social needs screening and management. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool from PRAPARE (Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risks, and Experiences), and a survey to query patients’ preferences for addressing social needs. Instruments were administered online to peripartum participants, with equal representation of patients with public and private insurance. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the short-form tool vs PRAPARE. Quantitative responses were characterized using descriptive statistics. Free-text responses were analyzed with matrix and thematic coding. Survey data were analyzed by subgroups of historically marginalized populations. RESULTS: A total of 215 people completed the survey. Participants were predominantly White (167; 77.7%) and multiparous (145; 67.4%). Unmet social needs were prevalent with both the short-form tool (77.7%) and PRAPARE (96.7%). The sensitivity (79.3%) and specificity (71.4%) of the short-form screener were high for detecting any social need. Most participants believed that it was important for their pregnancy care team to know their social needs (material: 173, 80.5%; support: 200, 93.0%), and over half felt comfortable sharing their needs through in-person or digital modalities if assistance was or was not available (material: 117, 54.4%; support: 122, 56.7%). Free-text themes reflected considerations for integrating social needs in routine prenatal care. Acceptability of addressing social needs in pregnancy was high among all groups. CONCLUSION: A digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool performs well when compared with the gold standard. Pregnant people accept social needs as a part of routine pregnancy care. Future work is needed to operationalize efficient, effective, patient-centered approaches to addressing social needs in pregnancy. Elsevier 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10009524/ /pubmed/36922957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100158 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Peahl, Alex F.
Rubin-Miller, Lily
Paterson, Victoria
Jahnke, Hannah R.
Plough, Avery
Henrich, Natalie
Moss, Christa
Shah, Neel
Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey
title Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey
title_full Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey
title_fullStr Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey
title_full_unstemmed Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey
title_short Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey
title_sort understanding social needs in pregnancy: prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36922957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100158
work_keys_str_mv AT peahlalexf understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey
AT rubinmillerlily understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey
AT patersonvictoria understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey
AT jahnkehannahr understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey
AT ploughavery understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey
AT henrichnatalie understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey
AT mosschrista understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey
AT shahneel understandingsocialneedsinpregnancyprospectivevalidationofadigitalshortformscreeningtoolandpatientsurvey