Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of IL inhibitors, TNF-α inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are commonly used to improve ankylosing spondylitis (AS) symptoms if conventional treatments are ineffective or unsuitable. This systematic review aimed to compare the therapeutic effects and safety of JAK inhibitors, tumor necrosis factor-alph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Cong, Shu, Jianlong, Shao, Wenhui, Zhou, Zhengxin, Guo, Huayang, Wang, Jingang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923085
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-23-195
_version_ 1784906016481083392
author Tian, Cong
Shu, Jianlong
Shao, Wenhui
Zhou, Zhengxin
Guo, Huayang
Wang, Jingang
author_facet Tian, Cong
Shu, Jianlong
Shao, Wenhui
Zhou, Zhengxin
Guo, Huayang
Wang, Jingang
author_sort Tian, Cong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are commonly used to improve ankylosing spondylitis (AS) symptoms if conventional treatments are ineffective or unsuitable. This systematic review aimed to compare the therapeutic effects and safety of JAK inhibitors, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, and interleukin (IL) inhibitors in patients with AS. METHODS: We retrieved literature from various databases including Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Weipu Journal Database, SinoMed, and WanFang Data up to February 1, 2023, and evaluated the quality of the included RCTs using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. R 4.1.3, STATA 15.1 were employed for network meta-analyses. RESULTS: We identified 48 eligible articles including 8,937 patients. Ten articles were rated as “low risk”, 5 as “high risk”, and the others as “some concerns”. In terms of efficacy, IL-17, IL-6, and JAK inhibitors were compared with TNF-α inhibitors in ASAS20 (RR =0.81, 95% CI: 0.66–0.98; RR =0.57, 95% CI: 0.35–0.95; RR =0.77, 95% CI: 0.60–0.99). IL-6 inhibitors were compared with TNF-α inhibitors in ASAS5/6 (RR =0.39, 95% CI: 0.16–0.98). IL-23, JAK inhibitors were compared with TNF-α inhibitors in BASDAI50 (RR =0.35, 95% CI: 0.20–0.60; RR =0.70, 95% CI: 0.49–0.98). IL-17 inhibitors were compared with IL-23 and IL-6 inhibitors in BASFI (MD =−1.05, 95% CI: −1.65–−0.51; MD =−1.46, 95% CI: −2.02–−0.97). In terms of safety, IL-6 inhibitors were compared with JAK, TNF-α inhibitors in AEs (RR =1.38, 95% CI: 1.06–1.88; RR =1.30, 95% CI: 1.01–1.70). CONCLUSIONS: TNF-α inhibitors are significantly superior to both IL and JAK inhibitors, and may be the preferable option to deal with the rapid progression of AS and severe functional limitations. IL-17 inhibitors may better improve the BASDAI50 response compared with JAK, IL-23, and TNF-α inhibitors. The efficacy and safety of IL-6 inhibitors are inferior to other types of drugs, indicating the low efficacy and high risk of IL-6 inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10009571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100095712023-03-14 Efficacy and safety of IL inhibitors, TNF-α inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis Tian, Cong Shu, Jianlong Shao, Wenhui Zhou, Zhengxin Guo, Huayang Wang, Jingang Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are commonly used to improve ankylosing spondylitis (AS) symptoms if conventional treatments are ineffective or unsuitable. This systematic review aimed to compare the therapeutic effects and safety of JAK inhibitors, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, and interleukin (IL) inhibitors in patients with AS. METHODS: We retrieved literature from various databases including Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Weipu Journal Database, SinoMed, and WanFang Data up to February 1, 2023, and evaluated the quality of the included RCTs using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. R 4.1.3, STATA 15.1 were employed for network meta-analyses. RESULTS: We identified 48 eligible articles including 8,937 patients. Ten articles were rated as “low risk”, 5 as “high risk”, and the others as “some concerns”. In terms of efficacy, IL-17, IL-6, and JAK inhibitors were compared with TNF-α inhibitors in ASAS20 (RR =0.81, 95% CI: 0.66–0.98; RR =0.57, 95% CI: 0.35–0.95; RR =0.77, 95% CI: 0.60–0.99). IL-6 inhibitors were compared with TNF-α inhibitors in ASAS5/6 (RR =0.39, 95% CI: 0.16–0.98). IL-23, JAK inhibitors were compared with TNF-α inhibitors in BASDAI50 (RR =0.35, 95% CI: 0.20–0.60; RR =0.70, 95% CI: 0.49–0.98). IL-17 inhibitors were compared with IL-23 and IL-6 inhibitors in BASFI (MD =−1.05, 95% CI: −1.65–−0.51; MD =−1.46, 95% CI: −2.02–−0.97). In terms of safety, IL-6 inhibitors were compared with JAK, TNF-α inhibitors in AEs (RR =1.38, 95% CI: 1.06–1.88; RR =1.30, 95% CI: 1.01–1.70). CONCLUSIONS: TNF-α inhibitors are significantly superior to both IL and JAK inhibitors, and may be the preferable option to deal with the rapid progression of AS and severe functional limitations. IL-17 inhibitors may better improve the BASDAI50 response compared with JAK, IL-23, and TNF-α inhibitors. The efficacy and safety of IL-6 inhibitors are inferior to other types of drugs, indicating the low efficacy and high risk of IL-6 inhibitors. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-28 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10009571/ /pubmed/36923085 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-23-195 Text en 2023 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Tian, Cong
Shu, Jianlong
Shao, Wenhui
Zhou, Zhengxin
Guo, Huayang
Wang, Jingang
Efficacy and safety of IL inhibitors, TNF-α inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of IL inhibitors, TNF-α inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of IL inhibitors, TNF-α inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of IL inhibitors, TNF-α inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of IL inhibitors, TNF-α inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of IL inhibitors, TNF-α inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of il inhibitors, tnf-α inhibitors, and jak inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923085
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-23-195
work_keys_str_mv AT tiancong efficacyandsafetyofilinhibitorstnfainhibitorsandjakinhibitorsinpatientswithankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT shujianlong efficacyandsafetyofilinhibitorstnfainhibitorsandjakinhibitorsinpatientswithankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT shaowenhui efficacyandsafetyofilinhibitorstnfainhibitorsandjakinhibitorsinpatientswithankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhouzhengxin efficacyandsafetyofilinhibitorstnfainhibitorsandjakinhibitorsinpatientswithankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT guohuayang efficacyandsafetyofilinhibitorstnfainhibitorsandjakinhibitorsinpatientswithankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangjingang efficacyandsafetyofilinhibitorstnfainhibitorsandjakinhibitorsinpatientswithankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis