Cargando…
Exploring the ATN classification system using brain morphology
BACKGROUND: The NIA-AA proposed amyloid-tau-neurodegeneration (ATN) as a classification system for AD biomarkers. The amyloid cascade hypothesis (ACH) implies a sequence across ATN groups that patients might undergo during transition from healthy towards AD: A−T−N−➔A+T−N−➔A+T+N−➔A+T+N+. Here we asse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01185-x |
_version_ | 1784906089517547520 |
---|---|
author | Heinzinger, Nils Maass, Anne Berron, David Yakupov, Renat Peters, Oliver Fiebach, Jochen Villringer, Kersten Preis, Lukas Priller, Josef Spruth, Eike Jacob Altenstein, Slawek Schneider, Anja Fliessbach, Klaus Wiltfang, Jens Bartels, Claudia Jessen, Frank Maier, Franziska Glanz, Wenzel Buerger, Katharina Janowitz, Daniel Perneczky, Robert Rauchmann, Boris-Stephan Teipel, Stefan Killimann, Ingo Göerß, Doreen Laske, Christoph Munk, Matthias H. Spottke, Annika Roy, Nina Heneka, Michael T. Brosseron, Frederic Dobisch, Laura Ewers, Michael Dechent, Peter Haynes, John Dylan Scheffler, Klaus Wolfsgruber, Steffen Kleineidam, Luca Schmid, Matthias Berger, Moritz Düzel, Emrah Ziegler, Gabriel |
author_facet | Heinzinger, Nils Maass, Anne Berron, David Yakupov, Renat Peters, Oliver Fiebach, Jochen Villringer, Kersten Preis, Lukas Priller, Josef Spruth, Eike Jacob Altenstein, Slawek Schneider, Anja Fliessbach, Klaus Wiltfang, Jens Bartels, Claudia Jessen, Frank Maier, Franziska Glanz, Wenzel Buerger, Katharina Janowitz, Daniel Perneczky, Robert Rauchmann, Boris-Stephan Teipel, Stefan Killimann, Ingo Göerß, Doreen Laske, Christoph Munk, Matthias H. Spottke, Annika Roy, Nina Heneka, Michael T. Brosseron, Frederic Dobisch, Laura Ewers, Michael Dechent, Peter Haynes, John Dylan Scheffler, Klaus Wolfsgruber, Steffen Kleineidam, Luca Schmid, Matthias Berger, Moritz Düzel, Emrah Ziegler, Gabriel |
author_sort | Heinzinger, Nils |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The NIA-AA proposed amyloid-tau-neurodegeneration (ATN) as a classification system for AD biomarkers. The amyloid cascade hypothesis (ACH) implies a sequence across ATN groups that patients might undergo during transition from healthy towards AD: A−T−N−➔A+T−N−➔A+T+N−➔A+T+N+. Here we assess the evidence for monotonic brain volume decline for this particular (amyloid-conversion first, tau-conversion second, N-conversion last) and alternative progressions using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in a large cross-sectional MRI cohort. METHODS: We used baseline data of the DELCODE cohort of 437 subjects (127 controls, 168 SCD, 87 MCI, 55 AD patients) which underwent lumbar puncture, MRI scanning, and neuropsychological assessment. ATN classification was performed using CSF-Aβ42/Aβ40 (A+/−), CSF phospho-tau (T+/−), and adjusted hippocampal volume or CSF total-tau (N+/−). We compared voxel-wise model evidence for monotonic decline of gray matter volume across various sequences over ATN groups using the Bayesian Information Criterion (including also ROIs of Braak stages). First, face validity of the ACH transition sequence A−T−N−➔A+T−N−➔A+T+N−➔A+T+N+ was compared against biologically less plausible (permuted) sequences among AD continuum ATN groups. Second, we evaluated evidence for 6 monotonic brain volume progressions from A−T−N− towards A+T+N+ including also non-AD continuum ATN groups. RESULTS: The ACH-based progression A−T−N−➔A+T−N−➔A+T+N−➔A+T+N+ was consistent with cognitive decline and clinical diagnosis. Using hippocampal volume for operationalization of neurodegeneration (N), ACH was most evident in 9% of gray matter predominantly in the medial temporal lobe. Many cortical regions suggested alternative non-monotonic volume progressions over ACH progression groups, which is compatible with an early amyloid-related tissue expansion or sampling effects, e.g., due to brain reserve. Volume decline in 65% of gray matter was consistent with a progression where A status converts before T or N status (i.e., ACH/ANT) when compared to alternative sequences (TAN/TNA/NAT/NTA). Brain regions earlier affected by tau tangle deposition (Braak stage I-IV, MTL, limbic system) present stronger evidence for volume decline than late Braak stage ROIs (V/VI, cortical regions). Similar findings were observed when using CSF total-tau for N instead. CONCLUSION: Using the ATN classification system, early amyloid status conversion (before tau and neurodegeneration) is associated with brain volume loss observed during AD progression. The ATN system and the ACH are compatible with monotonic progression of MTL atrophy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00007966, 04/05/2015, retrospectively registered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-023-01185-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10009950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100099502023-03-14 Exploring the ATN classification system using brain morphology Heinzinger, Nils Maass, Anne Berron, David Yakupov, Renat Peters, Oliver Fiebach, Jochen Villringer, Kersten Preis, Lukas Priller, Josef Spruth, Eike Jacob Altenstein, Slawek Schneider, Anja Fliessbach, Klaus Wiltfang, Jens Bartels, Claudia Jessen, Frank Maier, Franziska Glanz, Wenzel Buerger, Katharina Janowitz, Daniel Perneczky, Robert Rauchmann, Boris-Stephan Teipel, Stefan Killimann, Ingo Göerß, Doreen Laske, Christoph Munk, Matthias H. Spottke, Annika Roy, Nina Heneka, Michael T. Brosseron, Frederic Dobisch, Laura Ewers, Michael Dechent, Peter Haynes, John Dylan Scheffler, Klaus Wolfsgruber, Steffen Kleineidam, Luca Schmid, Matthias Berger, Moritz Düzel, Emrah Ziegler, Gabriel Alzheimers Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: The NIA-AA proposed amyloid-tau-neurodegeneration (ATN) as a classification system for AD biomarkers. The amyloid cascade hypothesis (ACH) implies a sequence across ATN groups that patients might undergo during transition from healthy towards AD: A−T−N−➔A+T−N−➔A+T+N−➔A+T+N+. Here we assess the evidence for monotonic brain volume decline for this particular (amyloid-conversion first, tau-conversion second, N-conversion last) and alternative progressions using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in a large cross-sectional MRI cohort. METHODS: We used baseline data of the DELCODE cohort of 437 subjects (127 controls, 168 SCD, 87 MCI, 55 AD patients) which underwent lumbar puncture, MRI scanning, and neuropsychological assessment. ATN classification was performed using CSF-Aβ42/Aβ40 (A+/−), CSF phospho-tau (T+/−), and adjusted hippocampal volume or CSF total-tau (N+/−). We compared voxel-wise model evidence for monotonic decline of gray matter volume across various sequences over ATN groups using the Bayesian Information Criterion (including also ROIs of Braak stages). First, face validity of the ACH transition sequence A−T−N−➔A+T−N−➔A+T+N−➔A+T+N+ was compared against biologically less plausible (permuted) sequences among AD continuum ATN groups. Second, we evaluated evidence for 6 monotonic brain volume progressions from A−T−N− towards A+T+N+ including also non-AD continuum ATN groups. RESULTS: The ACH-based progression A−T−N−➔A+T−N−➔A+T+N−➔A+T+N+ was consistent with cognitive decline and clinical diagnosis. Using hippocampal volume for operationalization of neurodegeneration (N), ACH was most evident in 9% of gray matter predominantly in the medial temporal lobe. Many cortical regions suggested alternative non-monotonic volume progressions over ACH progression groups, which is compatible with an early amyloid-related tissue expansion or sampling effects, e.g., due to brain reserve. Volume decline in 65% of gray matter was consistent with a progression where A status converts before T or N status (i.e., ACH/ANT) when compared to alternative sequences (TAN/TNA/NAT/NTA). Brain regions earlier affected by tau tangle deposition (Braak stage I-IV, MTL, limbic system) present stronger evidence for volume decline than late Braak stage ROIs (V/VI, cortical regions). Similar findings were observed when using CSF total-tau for N instead. CONCLUSION: Using the ATN classification system, early amyloid status conversion (before tau and neurodegeneration) is associated with brain volume loss observed during AD progression. The ATN system and the ACH are compatible with monotonic progression of MTL atrophy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00007966, 04/05/2015, retrospectively registered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-023-01185-x. BioMed Central 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10009950/ /pubmed/36915139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01185-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Heinzinger, Nils Maass, Anne Berron, David Yakupov, Renat Peters, Oliver Fiebach, Jochen Villringer, Kersten Preis, Lukas Priller, Josef Spruth, Eike Jacob Altenstein, Slawek Schneider, Anja Fliessbach, Klaus Wiltfang, Jens Bartels, Claudia Jessen, Frank Maier, Franziska Glanz, Wenzel Buerger, Katharina Janowitz, Daniel Perneczky, Robert Rauchmann, Boris-Stephan Teipel, Stefan Killimann, Ingo Göerß, Doreen Laske, Christoph Munk, Matthias H. Spottke, Annika Roy, Nina Heneka, Michael T. Brosseron, Frederic Dobisch, Laura Ewers, Michael Dechent, Peter Haynes, John Dylan Scheffler, Klaus Wolfsgruber, Steffen Kleineidam, Luca Schmid, Matthias Berger, Moritz Düzel, Emrah Ziegler, Gabriel Exploring the ATN classification system using brain morphology |
title | Exploring the ATN classification system using brain morphology |
title_full | Exploring the ATN classification system using brain morphology |
title_fullStr | Exploring the ATN classification system using brain morphology |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the ATN classification system using brain morphology |
title_short | Exploring the ATN classification system using brain morphology |
title_sort | exploring the atn classification system using brain morphology |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01185-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heinzingernils exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT maassanne exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT berrondavid exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT yakupovrenat exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT petersoliver exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT fiebachjochen exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT villringerkersten exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT preislukas exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT prillerjosef exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT sprutheikejacob exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT altensteinslawek exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT schneideranja exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT fliessbachklaus exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT wiltfangjens exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT bartelsclaudia exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT jessenfrank exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT maierfranziska exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT glanzwenzel exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT buergerkatharina exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT janowitzdaniel exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT perneczkyrobert exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT rauchmannborisstephan exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT teipelstefan exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT killimanningo exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT goerßdoreen exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT laskechristoph exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT munkmatthiash exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT spottkeannika exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT roynina exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT henekamichaelt exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT brosseronfrederic exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT dobischlaura exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT ewersmichael exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT dechentpeter exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT haynesjohndylan exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT schefflerklaus exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT wolfsgrubersteffen exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT kleineidamluca exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT schmidmatthias exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT bergermoritz exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT duzelemrah exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT zieglergabriel exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology AT exploringtheatnclassificationsystemusingbrainmorphology |