Cargando…

High-demand tasks show that ACL reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation

BACKGROUND: Excessive range of tibial rotation (rTR) may be a reason why athletes cannot return to sports after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). After ACLR, rTR is smaller in reconstructed knees compared to contralateral knees when measured during low-to-moderate-demand tasks. This may not be representati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zee, Mark, Keizer, Michele, van Raaij, Jos, Hijmans, Juha, van den Akker-Scheek, Inge, Diercks, Ron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03639-2
_version_ 1784906097007525888
author Zee, Mark
Keizer, Michele
van Raaij, Jos
Hijmans, Juha
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Diercks, Ron
author_facet Zee, Mark
Keizer, Michele
van Raaij, Jos
Hijmans, Juha
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Diercks, Ron
author_sort Zee, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Excessive range of tibial rotation (rTR) may be a reason why athletes cannot return to sports after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). After ACLR, rTR is smaller in reconstructed knees compared to contralateral knees when measured during low-to-moderate-demand tasks. This may not be representative of the amount of rotational laxity during sports activities. The purpose of this study is to determine whether rTR is increased after ACL injury compared to the contralateral knee and whether it returns to normal after ACLR when assessed during high-demand hoptests, with the contralateral knee as a reference. METHODS: Ten ACL injured subjects were tested within three months after injury and one year after reconstruction. Kinematic motion analysis was conducted, analysing both knees. Subjects performed a level-walking task, a single-leg hop for distance and a side jump. A paired t-test was used to detect a difference between mean kinematic variables before and after ACL reconstruction, and between the ACL-affected knees and contralateral knees before and after reconstruction. RESULTS: RTR was greater during high-demand tasks compared to low-demand tasks. Pre-operative, rTR was smaller in the ACL-deficient knees compared to the contralateral knees during all tests. After ACLR, a greater rTR was seen in ACL-reconstructed knees compared to pre-operative, but a smaller rTR compared to the contralateral knees, even during high-demand tasks. CONCLUSION: The smaller rTR, compared to the contralateral knee, seen after a subacute ACL tear may be attributed to altered landing technique, neuromuscular adaptation and fear of re-injury. The continued reduction in rTR one year after ACLR may be a combination of this neuromuscular adaptation and the biomechanical impact of the reconstruction. Trial registration: The trial was registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR: www.trialregister.nl, registration ID NL7686). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03639-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10009984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100099842023-03-14 High-demand tasks show that ACL reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation Zee, Mark Keizer, Michele van Raaij, Jos Hijmans, Juha van den Akker-Scheek, Inge Diercks, Ron J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Excessive range of tibial rotation (rTR) may be a reason why athletes cannot return to sports after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). After ACLR, rTR is smaller in reconstructed knees compared to contralateral knees when measured during low-to-moderate-demand tasks. This may not be representative of the amount of rotational laxity during sports activities. The purpose of this study is to determine whether rTR is increased after ACL injury compared to the contralateral knee and whether it returns to normal after ACLR when assessed during high-demand hoptests, with the contralateral knee as a reference. METHODS: Ten ACL injured subjects were tested within three months after injury and one year after reconstruction. Kinematic motion analysis was conducted, analysing both knees. Subjects performed a level-walking task, a single-leg hop for distance and a side jump. A paired t-test was used to detect a difference between mean kinematic variables before and after ACL reconstruction, and between the ACL-affected knees and contralateral knees before and after reconstruction. RESULTS: RTR was greater during high-demand tasks compared to low-demand tasks. Pre-operative, rTR was smaller in the ACL-deficient knees compared to the contralateral knees during all tests. After ACLR, a greater rTR was seen in ACL-reconstructed knees compared to pre-operative, but a smaller rTR compared to the contralateral knees, even during high-demand tasks. CONCLUSION: The smaller rTR, compared to the contralateral knee, seen after a subacute ACL tear may be attributed to altered landing technique, neuromuscular adaptation and fear of re-injury. The continued reduction in rTR one year after ACLR may be a combination of this neuromuscular adaptation and the biomechanical impact of the reconstruction. Trial registration: The trial was registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR: www.trialregister.nl, registration ID NL7686). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03639-2. BioMed Central 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10009984/ /pubmed/36915116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03639-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zee, Mark
Keizer, Michele
van Raaij, Jos
Hijmans, Juha
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Diercks, Ron
High-demand tasks show that ACL reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation
title High-demand tasks show that ACL reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation
title_full High-demand tasks show that ACL reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation
title_fullStr High-demand tasks show that ACL reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation
title_full_unstemmed High-demand tasks show that ACL reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation
title_short High-demand tasks show that ACL reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation
title_sort high-demand tasks show that acl reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03639-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zeemark highdemandtasksshowthataclreconstructionisnottheonlyfactorincontrollingrangeoftibialrotationapreliminaryinvestigation
AT keizermichele highdemandtasksshowthataclreconstructionisnottheonlyfactorincontrollingrangeoftibialrotationapreliminaryinvestigation
AT vanraaijjos highdemandtasksshowthataclreconstructionisnottheonlyfactorincontrollingrangeoftibialrotationapreliminaryinvestigation
AT hijmansjuha highdemandtasksshowthataclreconstructionisnottheonlyfactorincontrollingrangeoftibialrotationapreliminaryinvestigation
AT vandenakkerscheekinge highdemandtasksshowthataclreconstructionisnottheonlyfactorincontrollingrangeoftibialrotationapreliminaryinvestigation
AT diercksron highdemandtasksshowthataclreconstructionisnottheonlyfactorincontrollingrangeoftibialrotationapreliminaryinvestigation