Cargando…

Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if daily oral 75 µg of Desogestrel (DSG) for 3 months prior to the insertion of etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant (ENG-IMPLANT) might help reduce its premature discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 66 women were randomized in the ENG-IMPLANT group (26) and in the DSG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lombardi Fäh, Valeria, Catarino, Rosa, Castillo, Sarah, Badda, Maria, Gezer-Dickschat, Sibel, Thieringer, Friederike, Tschudin, Sibil, Viviano, Manuela, Yaron, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06304-3
_version_ 1784906113819344896
author Lombardi Fäh, Valeria
Catarino, Rosa
Castillo, Sarah
Badda, Maria
Gezer-Dickschat, Sibel
Thieringer, Friederike
Tschudin, Sibil
Viviano, Manuela
Yaron, Michal
author_facet Lombardi Fäh, Valeria
Catarino, Rosa
Castillo, Sarah
Badda, Maria
Gezer-Dickschat, Sibel
Thieringer, Friederike
Tschudin, Sibil
Viviano, Manuela
Yaron, Michal
author_sort Lombardi Fäh, Valeria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if daily oral 75 µg of Desogestrel (DSG) for 3 months prior to the insertion of etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant (ENG-IMPLANT) might help reduce its premature discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 66 women were randomized in the ENG-IMPLANT group (26) and in the DSG + ENG-IMPLANT group (40), respectively, in the Geneva University Hospitals and Basel University Hospital, from August 15th, 2016 through September 30th, 2019. In the DSG + ENG-IMPLANT group, patients were given a 3 months’ supply of 75 µg of DSG before the insertion of the ENG-IMPLANT. All women were seen after 3 months for bleeding and satisfaction evaluation, and at 12 months post ENG-IMPLANT insertion. Higher levels of satisfaction at 12-months were found in the ENG-IMPLANT group compared to the DSG + ENG-IMPLANT group (8.5 ± 1.7 vs. 6.6 ± 2.9, p = 0.012). There were no statistically significant differences regarding tolerance (7.8 ± 2.5 vs 6.8 ± 2.6, p = 0.191) and contraceptive continuation (80% vs 72.4%, p = 0.544) between groups. CONCLUSION: DSG prior to insertion of the ENG-IMPLANT did not improve its continuation rate neither its satisfaction at 1 year. Trial registration NCT05174195. Retrospectively registered, the 30th December 2021 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-023-06304-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10010063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100100632023-03-14 Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial Lombardi Fäh, Valeria Catarino, Rosa Castillo, Sarah Badda, Maria Gezer-Dickschat, Sibel Thieringer, Friederike Tschudin, Sibil Viviano, Manuela Yaron, Michal BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if daily oral 75 µg of Desogestrel (DSG) for 3 months prior to the insertion of etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant (ENG-IMPLANT) might help reduce its premature discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 66 women were randomized in the ENG-IMPLANT group (26) and in the DSG + ENG-IMPLANT group (40), respectively, in the Geneva University Hospitals and Basel University Hospital, from August 15th, 2016 through September 30th, 2019. In the DSG + ENG-IMPLANT group, patients were given a 3 months’ supply of 75 µg of DSG before the insertion of the ENG-IMPLANT. All women were seen after 3 months for bleeding and satisfaction evaluation, and at 12 months post ENG-IMPLANT insertion. Higher levels of satisfaction at 12-months were found in the ENG-IMPLANT group compared to the DSG + ENG-IMPLANT group (8.5 ± 1.7 vs. 6.6 ± 2.9, p = 0.012). There were no statistically significant differences regarding tolerance (7.8 ± 2.5 vs 6.8 ± 2.6, p = 0.191) and contraceptive continuation (80% vs 72.4%, p = 0.544) between groups. CONCLUSION: DSG prior to insertion of the ENG-IMPLANT did not improve its continuation rate neither its satisfaction at 1 year. Trial registration NCT05174195. Retrospectively registered, the 30th December 2021 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-023-06304-3. BioMed Central 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10010063/ /pubmed/36915205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06304-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Lombardi Fäh, Valeria
Catarino, Rosa
Castillo, Sarah
Badda, Maria
Gezer-Dickschat, Sibel
Thieringer, Friederike
Tschudin, Sibil
Viviano, Manuela
Yaron, Michal
Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial
title Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial
title_full Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial
title_fullStr Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial
title_short Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial
title_sort can a 3 months treatment with oral desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? a randomized trial
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06304-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lombardifahvaleria cana3monthstreatmentwithoraldesogestrelpriortoinsertionoftheetonogestrelreleasingcontraceptiveimplantimprovecontinuationrateat1yeararandomizedtrial
AT catarinorosa cana3monthstreatmentwithoraldesogestrelpriortoinsertionoftheetonogestrelreleasingcontraceptiveimplantimprovecontinuationrateat1yeararandomizedtrial
AT castillosarah cana3monthstreatmentwithoraldesogestrelpriortoinsertionoftheetonogestrelreleasingcontraceptiveimplantimprovecontinuationrateat1yeararandomizedtrial
AT baddamaria cana3monthstreatmentwithoraldesogestrelpriortoinsertionoftheetonogestrelreleasingcontraceptiveimplantimprovecontinuationrateat1yeararandomizedtrial
AT gezerdickschatsibel cana3monthstreatmentwithoraldesogestrelpriortoinsertionoftheetonogestrelreleasingcontraceptiveimplantimprovecontinuationrateat1yeararandomizedtrial
AT thieringerfriederike cana3monthstreatmentwithoraldesogestrelpriortoinsertionoftheetonogestrelreleasingcontraceptiveimplantimprovecontinuationrateat1yeararandomizedtrial
AT tschudinsibil cana3monthstreatmentwithoraldesogestrelpriortoinsertionoftheetonogestrelreleasingcontraceptiveimplantimprovecontinuationrateat1yeararandomizedtrial
AT vivianomanuela cana3monthstreatmentwithoraldesogestrelpriortoinsertionoftheetonogestrelreleasingcontraceptiveimplantimprovecontinuationrateat1yeararandomizedtrial
AT yaronmichal cana3monthstreatmentwithoraldesogestrelpriortoinsertionoftheetonogestrelreleasingcontraceptiveimplantimprovecontinuationrateat1yeararandomizedtrial