Cargando…

Engaging participants with research findings: A rights‐informed approach

BACKGROUND: Sharing research findings with participants is recognized as an ethical imperative for the research community. However, most discourse on this topic in mainstream public health takes a paternalistic approach, with researchers retaining the power to choose if, when, and how research findi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Mathew Sunil, Gaitonde, Rakhal, Davey, Rachel, Mohanty, Itismita, Upton, Penney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13701
_version_ 1784906120804958208
author George, Mathew Sunil
Gaitonde, Rakhal
Davey, Rachel
Mohanty, Itismita
Upton, Penney
author_facet George, Mathew Sunil
Gaitonde, Rakhal
Davey, Rachel
Mohanty, Itismita
Upton, Penney
author_sort George, Mathew Sunil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sharing research findings with participants is recognized as an ethical imperative for the research community. However, most discourse on this topic in mainstream public health takes a paternalistic approach, with researchers retaining the power to choose if, when, and how research findings are shared. METHODS: Fieldwork took place from August 2018 to January 2019 and again from August 2019 to December 2019 among two communities in the south Indian state of Kerala. We integrated participant engagement with study findings into the research protocol, using various collaborative strategies identified during the design stage, forming partnerships with participants and determining appropriate forms of dissemination for different participant groups during fieldwork. RESULTS: Findings from previous research projects undertaken with these communities by other researchers had not been shared with them. This was interpreted by the communities as researchers not being interested in making a difference to their situation. In the current study, building reciprocal relationships that minimized power disparities, and providing outputs in tailored formats that promoted active engagement were key factors that enabled participants to engage with results. This engagement added value by enabling us to co‐develop study recommendations. This process also enabled the community to have ownership of the results and use them to advocate for health system change to improve access to health care. CONCLUSION: Research should be transformative for participating communities. Participants have a right to know the results of the research they participate in since their knowledge provides the research data which can in turn promote community change. Operationalising this requires researchers to build partnerships with participants and their communities from the outset. The role of participants must be reimagined, and adequate resources should be built into the research process. This is both socially responsible and ethical, but also improves the impact and legitimacy of research for the participants and the communities that they represent. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Participants of our research contributed to the design of various aspects of the engagement processes including the venue, the formats used for engagement, interpretation of the findings and recommendations from our research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10010096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100100962023-03-14 Engaging participants with research findings: A rights‐informed approach George, Mathew Sunil Gaitonde, Rakhal Davey, Rachel Mohanty, Itismita Upton, Penney Health Expect Original Articles BACKGROUND: Sharing research findings with participants is recognized as an ethical imperative for the research community. However, most discourse on this topic in mainstream public health takes a paternalistic approach, with researchers retaining the power to choose if, when, and how research findings are shared. METHODS: Fieldwork took place from August 2018 to January 2019 and again from August 2019 to December 2019 among two communities in the south Indian state of Kerala. We integrated participant engagement with study findings into the research protocol, using various collaborative strategies identified during the design stage, forming partnerships with participants and determining appropriate forms of dissemination for different participant groups during fieldwork. RESULTS: Findings from previous research projects undertaken with these communities by other researchers had not been shared with them. This was interpreted by the communities as researchers not being interested in making a difference to their situation. In the current study, building reciprocal relationships that minimized power disparities, and providing outputs in tailored formats that promoted active engagement were key factors that enabled participants to engage with results. This engagement added value by enabling us to co‐develop study recommendations. This process also enabled the community to have ownership of the results and use them to advocate for health system change to improve access to health care. CONCLUSION: Research should be transformative for participating communities. Participants have a right to know the results of the research they participate in since their knowledge provides the research data which can in turn promote community change. Operationalising this requires researchers to build partnerships with participants and their communities from the outset. The role of participants must be reimagined, and adequate resources should be built into the research process. This is both socially responsible and ethical, but also improves the impact and legitimacy of research for the participants and the communities that they represent. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Participants of our research contributed to the design of various aspects of the engagement processes including the venue, the formats used for engagement, interpretation of the findings and recommendations from our research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10010096/ /pubmed/36647684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13701 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
George, Mathew Sunil
Gaitonde, Rakhal
Davey, Rachel
Mohanty, Itismita
Upton, Penney
Engaging participants with research findings: A rights‐informed approach
title Engaging participants with research findings: A rights‐informed approach
title_full Engaging participants with research findings: A rights‐informed approach
title_fullStr Engaging participants with research findings: A rights‐informed approach
title_full_unstemmed Engaging participants with research findings: A rights‐informed approach
title_short Engaging participants with research findings: A rights‐informed approach
title_sort engaging participants with research findings: a rights‐informed approach
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13701
work_keys_str_mv AT georgemathewsunil engagingparticipantswithresearchfindingsarightsinformedapproach
AT gaitonderakhal engagingparticipantswithresearchfindingsarightsinformedapproach
AT daveyrachel engagingparticipantswithresearchfindingsarightsinformedapproach
AT mohantyitismita engagingparticipantswithresearchfindingsarightsinformedapproach
AT uptonpenney engagingparticipantswithresearchfindingsarightsinformedapproach