Cargando…

Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to investigate, from a longitudinal perspective, how WHO communicated COVID-19 related information to the public through its press conferences during the first two years of the pandemic. METHODS: The transcripts of 195 WHO COVID-19 press conferences held be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Sike, Li, Dapeng, Liu, Chang-Hai, Xiong, Ying, Liu, Dan, Feng, Jiaming, Wen, Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36913376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282855
_version_ 1784906193066524672
author He, Sike
Li, Dapeng
Liu, Chang-Hai
Xiong, Ying
Liu, Dan
Feng, Jiaming
Wen, Ju
author_facet He, Sike
Li, Dapeng
Liu, Chang-Hai
Xiong, Ying
Liu, Dan
Feng, Jiaming
Wen, Ju
author_sort He, Sike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to investigate, from a longitudinal perspective, how WHO communicated COVID-19 related information to the public through its press conferences during the first two years of the pandemic. METHODS: The transcripts of 195 WHO COVID-19 press conferences held between January 22, 2020 and February 23, 2022 were collected. All transcripts were syntactically parsed to extract highly frequent noun chunks that were potential topics of the press conferences. First-order autoregression models were fit to identify “hot” and “cold” topics. In addition, sentiments and emotions expressed in the transcripts were analyzed using lexicon-based sentiment/emotion analyses. Mann-Kendall tests were performed to capture the possible trends of sentiments and emotions over time. RESULTS: First, eleven “hot” topics were identified. These topics were pertinent to anti-pandemic measures, disease surveillance and development, and vaccine-related issues. Second, no significant trend was captured in sentiments. Last, significant downward trends were found in anticipation, surprise, anger, disgust, and fear. However, no significant trends were found in joy, trust, and sadness. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study provided new empirical evidence on how WHO communicated issues pertaining to COVID-19 to the general public through its press conferences. With the help of the study, members of the general public, health organizations, and other stake-holders will be able to better understand the way in which WHO has responded to various critical events during the first two years of the pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10010532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100105322023-03-14 Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis He, Sike Li, Dapeng Liu, Chang-Hai Xiong, Ying Liu, Dan Feng, Jiaming Wen, Ju PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to investigate, from a longitudinal perspective, how WHO communicated COVID-19 related information to the public through its press conferences during the first two years of the pandemic. METHODS: The transcripts of 195 WHO COVID-19 press conferences held between January 22, 2020 and February 23, 2022 were collected. All transcripts were syntactically parsed to extract highly frequent noun chunks that were potential topics of the press conferences. First-order autoregression models were fit to identify “hot” and “cold” topics. In addition, sentiments and emotions expressed in the transcripts were analyzed using lexicon-based sentiment/emotion analyses. Mann-Kendall tests were performed to capture the possible trends of sentiments and emotions over time. RESULTS: First, eleven “hot” topics were identified. These topics were pertinent to anti-pandemic measures, disease surveillance and development, and vaccine-related issues. Second, no significant trend was captured in sentiments. Last, significant downward trends were found in anticipation, surprise, anger, disgust, and fear. However, no significant trends were found in joy, trust, and sadness. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study provided new empirical evidence on how WHO communicated issues pertaining to COVID-19 to the general public through its press conferences. With the help of the study, members of the general public, health organizations, and other stake-holders will be able to better understand the way in which WHO has responded to various critical events during the first two years of the pandemic. Public Library of Science 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10010532/ /pubmed/36913376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282855 Text en © 2023 He et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Sike
Li, Dapeng
Liu, Chang-Hai
Xiong, Ying
Liu, Dan
Feng, Jiaming
Wen, Ju
Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis
title Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis
title_full Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis
title_short Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis
title_sort crisis communication in the who covid-19 press conferences: a retrospective analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36913376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282855
work_keys_str_mv AT hesike crisiscommunicationinthewhocovid19pressconferencesaretrospectiveanalysis
AT lidapeng crisiscommunicationinthewhocovid19pressconferencesaretrospectiveanalysis
AT liuchanghai crisiscommunicationinthewhocovid19pressconferencesaretrospectiveanalysis
AT xiongying crisiscommunicationinthewhocovid19pressconferencesaretrospectiveanalysis
AT liudan crisiscommunicationinthewhocovid19pressconferencesaretrospectiveanalysis
AT fengjiaming crisiscommunicationinthewhocovid19pressconferencesaretrospectiveanalysis
AT wenju crisiscommunicationinthewhocovid19pressconferencesaretrospectiveanalysis