Cargando…

Difference in Muscle Strength and Functional Outcome in Direct Lateral Approach versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The choice between posterior approach (PA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a contentious issue regarding clinical outcome optimization and restoring patient function. Previous studies have evaluated the postsurgical outcomes mostly i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ansari, Sajid, Singh, Sanny Kumar, Regmi, Anil, Goyal, Tarun, Kalia, Roop Bhushan, Yadav, Raj Kumar, Suresh Gowda, Aditya Koduvally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_258_22
_version_ 1784906206721081344
author Ansari, Sajid
Singh, Sanny Kumar
Regmi, Anil
Goyal, Tarun
Kalia, Roop Bhushan
Yadav, Raj Kumar
Suresh Gowda, Aditya Koduvally
author_facet Ansari, Sajid
Singh, Sanny Kumar
Regmi, Anil
Goyal, Tarun
Kalia, Roop Bhushan
Yadav, Raj Kumar
Suresh Gowda, Aditya Koduvally
author_sort Ansari, Sajid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The choice between posterior approach (PA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a contentious issue regarding clinical outcome optimization and restoring patient function. Previous studies have evaluated the postsurgical outcomes mostly in the form of Harris hip score (HHS), and the data to objectively measure the postoperative muscle power is scarce. We intend to objectively compare the hip abduction and extension strengths and other functional outcomes with a very simple tool in PA and DLA in the Indian population as most patients do not undergo as intensive rehabilitation in the postoperative period as in the western world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 158 patients underwent THA during the study period, of which 48 met inclusion criteria and only 42 completed 6 months follow-up. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up. At each visit, muscle strength was tested using a customized sling device mounted on a pulling apparatus fitted on the wall, as well as a pain score (VAS), Harris hip score (HHS), and Short Form Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: The study showed statistically significant better hip muscle strength at 2 weeks postoperative for leg press test and 2 weeks as well as 6 weeks postoperative for hip abduction strength in the PA. However, no differences were noted during the 3 or 6 months follow-up period among the DLA and PA. The surgical approach used has no effect on VAS, HHS, or SF-36 scorings. CONCLUSION: The weak abductor mechanism at 2 and 6 weeks and extension mechanism at 2 weeks in a cohort of DLA in contrast to the PA are seen in the early postoperative period and hence are short-lived muscle weakness. However, there is no effect on VAS, HSS, and SF-36 scores. Therefore, the surgical approach is to be chosen according to the surgeon’s expertise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10010584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100105842023-03-14 Difference in Muscle Strength and Functional Outcome in Direct Lateral Approach versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study Ansari, Sajid Singh, Sanny Kumar Regmi, Anil Goyal, Tarun Kalia, Roop Bhushan Yadav, Raj Kumar Suresh Gowda, Aditya Koduvally J West Afr Coll Surg Original Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The choice between posterior approach (PA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a contentious issue regarding clinical outcome optimization and restoring patient function. Previous studies have evaluated the postsurgical outcomes mostly in the form of Harris hip score (HHS), and the data to objectively measure the postoperative muscle power is scarce. We intend to objectively compare the hip abduction and extension strengths and other functional outcomes with a very simple tool in PA and DLA in the Indian population as most patients do not undergo as intensive rehabilitation in the postoperative period as in the western world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 158 patients underwent THA during the study period, of which 48 met inclusion criteria and only 42 completed 6 months follow-up. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up. At each visit, muscle strength was tested using a customized sling device mounted on a pulling apparatus fitted on the wall, as well as a pain score (VAS), Harris hip score (HHS), and Short Form Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: The study showed statistically significant better hip muscle strength at 2 weeks postoperative for leg press test and 2 weeks as well as 6 weeks postoperative for hip abduction strength in the PA. However, no differences were noted during the 3 or 6 months follow-up period among the DLA and PA. The surgical approach used has no effect on VAS, HHS, or SF-36 scorings. CONCLUSION: The weak abductor mechanism at 2 and 6 weeks and extension mechanism at 2 weeks in a cohort of DLA in contrast to the PA are seen in the early postoperative period and hence are short-lived muscle weakness. However, there is no effect on VAS, HSS, and SF-36 scores. Therefore, the surgical approach is to be chosen according to the surgeon’s expertise. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10010584/ /pubmed/36923802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_258_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of West African College of Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ansari, Sajid
Singh, Sanny Kumar
Regmi, Anil
Goyal, Tarun
Kalia, Roop Bhushan
Yadav, Raj Kumar
Suresh Gowda, Aditya Koduvally
Difference in Muscle Strength and Functional Outcome in Direct Lateral Approach versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study
title Difference in Muscle Strength and Functional Outcome in Direct Lateral Approach versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full Difference in Muscle Strength and Functional Outcome in Direct Lateral Approach versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Difference in Muscle Strength and Functional Outcome in Direct Lateral Approach versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Difference in Muscle Strength and Functional Outcome in Direct Lateral Approach versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_short Difference in Muscle Strength and Functional Outcome in Direct Lateral Approach versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort difference in muscle strength and functional outcome in direct lateral approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36923802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_258_22
work_keys_str_mv AT ansarisajid differenceinmusclestrengthandfunctionaloutcomeindirectlateralapproachversusposteriorapproachintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT singhsannykumar differenceinmusclestrengthandfunctionaloutcomeindirectlateralapproachversusposteriorapproachintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT regmianil differenceinmusclestrengthandfunctionaloutcomeindirectlateralapproachversusposteriorapproachintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT goyaltarun differenceinmusclestrengthandfunctionaloutcomeindirectlateralapproachversusposteriorapproachintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kaliaroopbhushan differenceinmusclestrengthandfunctionaloutcomeindirectlateralapproachversusposteriorapproachintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT yadavrajkumar differenceinmusclestrengthandfunctionaloutcomeindirectlateralapproachversusposteriorapproachintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sureshgowdaadityakoduvally differenceinmusclestrengthandfunctionaloutcomeindirectlateralapproachversusposteriorapproachintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy