Cargando…

Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process

BACKGROUND: Globally, millions of people die and many more develop disabilities resulting from injuries each year. Most people who die from injuries do so before they are transported to hospital. Thus, reliable, pragmatic, and evidence-based prehospital guidance for various injuries is essential. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuupiel, Desmond, Jessani, Nasreen S., Boffa, Jody, Naude, Celeste, De Buck, Emmy, Vandekerckhove, Philippe, McCaul, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x
_version_ 1784906281692168192
author Kuupiel, Desmond
Jessani, Nasreen S.
Boffa, Jody
Naude, Celeste
De Buck, Emmy
Vandekerckhove, Philippe
McCaul, Michael
author_facet Kuupiel, Desmond
Jessani, Nasreen S.
Boffa, Jody
Naude, Celeste
De Buck, Emmy
Vandekerckhove, Philippe
McCaul, Michael
author_sort Kuupiel, Desmond
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Globally, millions of people die and many more develop disabilities resulting from injuries each year. Most people who die from injuries do so before they are transported to hospital. Thus, reliable, pragmatic, and evidence-based prehospital guidance for various injuries is essential. We systematically mapped and described prehospital clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for injuries in the global context, as well as prioritised injury topics for guidance development and adolopment. METHODS: This study was sequentially conducted in three phases: a scoping review for CPGs (Phase I), identification and refinement of gaps in CPGs (Phase II), and ranking and prioritisation of gaps in CPGs (Phase III). For Phase I, we searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Trip Database; guideline repositories and websites up to 23(rd) May 2021. Two authors in duplicate independently screened titles and abstract, and full-text as well as extracted data of eligible CPGs. Guidelines had to meet 60% minimum methodological quality according to rigour of development domain in AGREE II. The second and third phases involved 17 participants from 9 African countries and 1 from Europe who participated in a virtual stakeholder engagement workshop held on 5 April 2022, and followed by an online ranking process. RESULTS: Fifty-eight CPGs were included out of 3,427 guidance documents obtained and screened. 39/58 (67%) were developed de novo compared to 19 that were developed using alternative approaches. Twenty-five out of 58 guidelines (43%) were developed by bodies in countries within the WHO European Region, while only one guideline was targeted to the African context. Twenty-five (43%) CPGs targeted emergency medical service providers, while 13 (22%) targeted first aid providers (laypeople). Forty-three CPGs (74%) targeted people of all ages. The 58 guidance documents contained 32 injury topics. Injuries linked to road traffic accidents such as traumatic brain injuries and chest injuries were among the top prioritised topics for future guideline development by the workshop participants. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the availability, gaps and priority injury topics for future guideline development/adolopment, especially for the African context. Further research is needed to evaluate the recommendations in the 58 included CPGs for possible adaptation to the African context. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10010958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100109582023-03-14 Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process Kuupiel, Desmond Jessani, Nasreen S. Boffa, Jody Naude, Celeste De Buck, Emmy Vandekerckhove, Philippe McCaul, Michael BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: Globally, millions of people die and many more develop disabilities resulting from injuries each year. Most people who die from injuries do so before they are transported to hospital. Thus, reliable, pragmatic, and evidence-based prehospital guidance for various injuries is essential. We systematically mapped and described prehospital clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for injuries in the global context, as well as prioritised injury topics for guidance development and adolopment. METHODS: This study was sequentially conducted in three phases: a scoping review for CPGs (Phase I), identification and refinement of gaps in CPGs (Phase II), and ranking and prioritisation of gaps in CPGs (Phase III). For Phase I, we searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Trip Database; guideline repositories and websites up to 23(rd) May 2021. Two authors in duplicate independently screened titles and abstract, and full-text as well as extracted data of eligible CPGs. Guidelines had to meet 60% minimum methodological quality according to rigour of development domain in AGREE II. The second and third phases involved 17 participants from 9 African countries and 1 from Europe who participated in a virtual stakeholder engagement workshop held on 5 April 2022, and followed by an online ranking process. RESULTS: Fifty-eight CPGs were included out of 3,427 guidance documents obtained and screened. 39/58 (67%) were developed de novo compared to 19 that were developed using alternative approaches. Twenty-five out of 58 guidelines (43%) were developed by bodies in countries within the WHO European Region, while only one guideline was targeted to the African context. Twenty-five (43%) CPGs targeted emergency medical service providers, while 13 (22%) targeted first aid providers (laypeople). Forty-three CPGs (74%) targeted people of all ages. The 58 guidance documents contained 32 injury topics. Injuries linked to road traffic accidents such as traumatic brain injuries and chest injuries were among the top prioritised topics for future guideline development by the workshop participants. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the availability, gaps and priority injury topics for future guideline development/adolopment, especially for the African context. Further research is needed to evaluate the recommendations in the 58 included CPGs for possible adaptation to the African context. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x. BioMed Central 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10010958/ /pubmed/36915034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kuupiel, Desmond
Jessani, Nasreen S.
Boffa, Jody
Naude, Celeste
De Buck, Emmy
Vandekerckhove, Philippe
McCaul, Michael
Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process
title Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process
title_full Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process
title_fullStr Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process
title_full_unstemmed Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process
title_short Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process
title_sort prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kuupieldesmond prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess
AT jessaninasreens prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess
AT boffajody prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess
AT naudeceleste prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess
AT debuckemmy prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess
AT vandekerckhovephilippe prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess
AT mccaulmichael prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess