Cargando…
Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process
BACKGROUND: Globally, millions of people die and many more develop disabilities resulting from injuries each year. Most people who die from injuries do so before they are transported to hospital. Thus, reliable, pragmatic, and evidence-based prehospital guidance for various injuries is essential. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x |
_version_ | 1784906281692168192 |
---|---|
author | Kuupiel, Desmond Jessani, Nasreen S. Boffa, Jody Naude, Celeste De Buck, Emmy Vandekerckhove, Philippe McCaul, Michael |
author_facet | Kuupiel, Desmond Jessani, Nasreen S. Boffa, Jody Naude, Celeste De Buck, Emmy Vandekerckhove, Philippe McCaul, Michael |
author_sort | Kuupiel, Desmond |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Globally, millions of people die and many more develop disabilities resulting from injuries each year. Most people who die from injuries do so before they are transported to hospital. Thus, reliable, pragmatic, and evidence-based prehospital guidance for various injuries is essential. We systematically mapped and described prehospital clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for injuries in the global context, as well as prioritised injury topics for guidance development and adolopment. METHODS: This study was sequentially conducted in three phases: a scoping review for CPGs (Phase I), identification and refinement of gaps in CPGs (Phase II), and ranking and prioritisation of gaps in CPGs (Phase III). For Phase I, we searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Trip Database; guideline repositories and websites up to 23(rd) May 2021. Two authors in duplicate independently screened titles and abstract, and full-text as well as extracted data of eligible CPGs. Guidelines had to meet 60% minimum methodological quality according to rigour of development domain in AGREE II. The second and third phases involved 17 participants from 9 African countries and 1 from Europe who participated in a virtual stakeholder engagement workshop held on 5 April 2022, and followed by an online ranking process. RESULTS: Fifty-eight CPGs were included out of 3,427 guidance documents obtained and screened. 39/58 (67%) were developed de novo compared to 19 that were developed using alternative approaches. Twenty-five out of 58 guidelines (43%) were developed by bodies in countries within the WHO European Region, while only one guideline was targeted to the African context. Twenty-five (43%) CPGs targeted emergency medical service providers, while 13 (22%) targeted first aid providers (laypeople). Forty-three CPGs (74%) targeted people of all ages. The 58 guidance documents contained 32 injury topics. Injuries linked to road traffic accidents such as traumatic brain injuries and chest injuries were among the top prioritised topics for future guideline development by the workshop participants. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the availability, gaps and priority injury topics for future guideline development/adolopment, especially for the African context. Further research is needed to evaluate the recommendations in the 58 included CPGs for possible adaptation to the African context. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10010958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100109582023-03-14 Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process Kuupiel, Desmond Jessani, Nasreen S. Boffa, Jody Naude, Celeste De Buck, Emmy Vandekerckhove, Philippe McCaul, Michael BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: Globally, millions of people die and many more develop disabilities resulting from injuries each year. Most people who die from injuries do so before they are transported to hospital. Thus, reliable, pragmatic, and evidence-based prehospital guidance for various injuries is essential. We systematically mapped and described prehospital clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for injuries in the global context, as well as prioritised injury topics for guidance development and adolopment. METHODS: This study was sequentially conducted in three phases: a scoping review for CPGs (Phase I), identification and refinement of gaps in CPGs (Phase II), and ranking and prioritisation of gaps in CPGs (Phase III). For Phase I, we searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Trip Database; guideline repositories and websites up to 23(rd) May 2021. Two authors in duplicate independently screened titles and abstract, and full-text as well as extracted data of eligible CPGs. Guidelines had to meet 60% minimum methodological quality according to rigour of development domain in AGREE II. The second and third phases involved 17 participants from 9 African countries and 1 from Europe who participated in a virtual stakeholder engagement workshop held on 5 April 2022, and followed by an online ranking process. RESULTS: Fifty-eight CPGs were included out of 3,427 guidance documents obtained and screened. 39/58 (67%) were developed de novo compared to 19 that were developed using alternative approaches. Twenty-five out of 58 guidelines (43%) were developed by bodies in countries within the WHO European Region, while only one guideline was targeted to the African context. Twenty-five (43%) CPGs targeted emergency medical service providers, while 13 (22%) targeted first aid providers (laypeople). Forty-three CPGs (74%) targeted people of all ages. The 58 guidance documents contained 32 injury topics. Injuries linked to road traffic accidents such as traumatic brain injuries and chest injuries were among the top prioritised topics for future guideline development by the workshop participants. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the availability, gaps and priority injury topics for future guideline development/adolopment, especially for the African context. Further research is needed to evaluate the recommendations in the 58 included CPGs for possible adaptation to the African context. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x. BioMed Central 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10010958/ /pubmed/36915034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kuupiel, Desmond Jessani, Nasreen S. Boffa, Jody Naude, Celeste De Buck, Emmy Vandekerckhove, Philippe McCaul, Michael Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process |
title | Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process |
title_full | Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process |
title_fullStr | Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process |
title_full_unstemmed | Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process |
title_short | Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process |
title_sort | prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00794-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuupieldesmond prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess AT jessaninasreens prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess AT boffajody prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess AT naudeceleste prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess AT debuckemmy prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess AT vandekerckhovephilippe prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess AT mccaulmichael prehospitalclinicalpracticeguidelinesforunintentionalinjuriesascopingreviewandprioritisationprocess |