Cargando…
Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis
AIMS: Optimal endovascular management of intermittent claudication (IC) remains disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety outcomes for balloon angioplasty (BA), bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents, and a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10011342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac722 |
_version_ | 1784906370264334336 |
---|---|
author | Koeckerling, David Raguindin, Peter Francis Kastrati, Lum Bernhard, Sarah Barker, Joseph Quiroga Centeno, Andrea Carolina Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza Khatami, Farnaz Niehot, Christa Lejay, Anne Szeberin, Zoltan Behrendt, Christian-Alexander Nordanstig, Joakim Muka, Taulant Baumgartner, Iris |
author_facet | Koeckerling, David Raguindin, Peter Francis Kastrati, Lum Bernhard, Sarah Barker, Joseph Quiroga Centeno, Andrea Carolina Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza Khatami, Farnaz Niehot, Christa Lejay, Anne Szeberin, Zoltan Behrendt, Christian-Alexander Nordanstig, Joakim Muka, Taulant Baumgartner, Iris |
author_sort | Koeckerling, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Optimal endovascular management of intermittent claudication (IC) remains disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety outcomes for balloon angioplasty (BA), bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents, and atherectomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials (RCT) from inception through November 2021. Efficacy outcomes were primary patency, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and quality-of-life (QoL). Safety endpoints were all-cause mortality and major amputation. Outcomes were evaluated at short-term (<1 year), mid-term (1–2 years), and long-term (≥2 years) follow-up. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021292639). Fifty-one RCTs enrolling 8430 patients/lesions were included. In femoropopliteal disease of low-to-intermediate complexity, DCBs were associated with higher likelihood of primary patency [short-term: odds ratio (OR) 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44–4.24; long-term: OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.93–3.16], lower TLR (short-term: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22–0.49; long-term: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29–0.60) and similar all-cause mortality risk, compared with BA. Primary stenting using BMS was associated with improved short-to-mid-term patency and TLR, but similar long-term efficacy compared with provisional stenting. Mid-term patency (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.89–3.03) and TLR (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22–1.11) estimates were comparable for DES vs. BMS. Atherectomy, used independently or adjunctively, was not associated with efficacy benefits compared with drug-coated and uncoated angioplasty, or stenting approaches. Paucity and heterogeneity of data precluded pooled analysis for aortoiliac disease and QoL endpoints. CONCLUSION: Certain devices may provide benefits in femoropopliteal disease, but comparative data in aortoiliac arteries is lacking. Gaps in evidence quantity and quality impede identification of the optimal endovascular approach to IC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10011342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100113422023-03-15 Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis Koeckerling, David Raguindin, Peter Francis Kastrati, Lum Bernhard, Sarah Barker, Joseph Quiroga Centeno, Andrea Carolina Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza Khatami, Farnaz Niehot, Christa Lejay, Anne Szeberin, Zoltan Behrendt, Christian-Alexander Nordanstig, Joakim Muka, Taulant Baumgartner, Iris Eur Heart J Meta-Analysis AIMS: Optimal endovascular management of intermittent claudication (IC) remains disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety outcomes for balloon angioplasty (BA), bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents, and atherectomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials (RCT) from inception through November 2021. Efficacy outcomes were primary patency, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and quality-of-life (QoL). Safety endpoints were all-cause mortality and major amputation. Outcomes were evaluated at short-term (<1 year), mid-term (1–2 years), and long-term (≥2 years) follow-up. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021292639). Fifty-one RCTs enrolling 8430 patients/lesions were included. In femoropopliteal disease of low-to-intermediate complexity, DCBs were associated with higher likelihood of primary patency [short-term: odds ratio (OR) 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44–4.24; long-term: OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.93–3.16], lower TLR (short-term: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22–0.49; long-term: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29–0.60) and similar all-cause mortality risk, compared with BA. Primary stenting using BMS was associated with improved short-to-mid-term patency and TLR, but similar long-term efficacy compared with provisional stenting. Mid-term patency (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.89–3.03) and TLR (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22–1.11) estimates were comparable for DES vs. BMS. Atherectomy, used independently or adjunctively, was not associated with efficacy benefits compared with drug-coated and uncoated angioplasty, or stenting approaches. Paucity and heterogeneity of data precluded pooled analysis for aortoiliac disease and QoL endpoints. CONCLUSION: Certain devices may provide benefits in femoropopliteal disease, but comparative data in aortoiliac arteries is lacking. Gaps in evidence quantity and quality impede identification of the optimal endovascular approach to IC. Oxford University Press 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10011342/ /pubmed/36721954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac722 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Koeckerling, David Raguindin, Peter Francis Kastrati, Lum Bernhard, Sarah Barker, Joseph Quiroga Centeno, Andrea Carolina Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza Khatami, Farnaz Niehot, Christa Lejay, Anne Szeberin, Zoltan Behrendt, Christian-Alexander Nordanstig, Joakim Muka, Taulant Baumgartner, Iris Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis |
title | Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10011342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac722 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koeckerlingdavid endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT raguindinpeterfrancis endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT kastratilum endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT bernhardsarah endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT barkerjoseph endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT quirogacentenoandreacarolina endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT raeisidehkordihamidreza endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT khatamifarnaz endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT niehotchrista endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT lejayanne endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT szeberinzoltan endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT behrendtchristianalexander endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT nordanstigjoakim endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT mukataulant endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis AT baumgartneriris endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis |