Cargando…

Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis

AIMS: Optimal endovascular management of intermittent claudication (IC) remains disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety outcomes for balloon angioplasty (BA), bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents, and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koeckerling, David, Raguindin, Peter Francis, Kastrati, Lum, Bernhard, Sarah, Barker, Joseph, Quiroga Centeno, Andrea Carolina, Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza, Khatami, Farnaz, Niehot, Christa, Lejay, Anne, Szeberin, Zoltan, Behrendt, Christian-Alexander, Nordanstig, Joakim, Muka, Taulant, Baumgartner, Iris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10011342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac722
_version_ 1784906370264334336
author Koeckerling, David
Raguindin, Peter Francis
Kastrati, Lum
Bernhard, Sarah
Barker, Joseph
Quiroga Centeno, Andrea Carolina
Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza
Khatami, Farnaz
Niehot, Christa
Lejay, Anne
Szeberin, Zoltan
Behrendt, Christian-Alexander
Nordanstig, Joakim
Muka, Taulant
Baumgartner, Iris
author_facet Koeckerling, David
Raguindin, Peter Francis
Kastrati, Lum
Bernhard, Sarah
Barker, Joseph
Quiroga Centeno, Andrea Carolina
Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza
Khatami, Farnaz
Niehot, Christa
Lejay, Anne
Szeberin, Zoltan
Behrendt, Christian-Alexander
Nordanstig, Joakim
Muka, Taulant
Baumgartner, Iris
author_sort Koeckerling, David
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Optimal endovascular management of intermittent claudication (IC) remains disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety outcomes for balloon angioplasty (BA), bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents, and atherectomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials (RCT) from inception through November 2021. Efficacy outcomes were primary patency, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and quality-of-life (QoL). Safety endpoints were all-cause mortality and major amputation. Outcomes were evaluated at short-term (<1 year), mid-term (1–2 years), and long-term (≥2 years) follow-up. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021292639). Fifty-one RCTs enrolling 8430 patients/lesions were included. In femoropopliteal disease of low-to-intermediate complexity, DCBs were associated with higher likelihood of primary patency [short-term: odds ratio (OR) 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44–4.24; long-term: OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.93–3.16], lower TLR (short-term: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22–0.49; long-term: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29–0.60) and similar all-cause mortality risk, compared with BA. Primary stenting using BMS was associated with improved short-to-mid-term patency and TLR, but similar long-term efficacy compared with provisional stenting. Mid-term patency (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.89–3.03) and TLR (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22–1.11) estimates were comparable for DES vs. BMS. Atherectomy, used independently or adjunctively, was not associated with efficacy benefits compared with drug-coated and uncoated angioplasty, or stenting approaches. Paucity and heterogeneity of data precluded pooled analysis for aortoiliac disease and QoL endpoints. CONCLUSION: Certain devices may provide benefits in femoropopliteal disease, but comparative data in aortoiliac arteries is lacking. Gaps in evidence quantity and quality impede identification of the optimal endovascular approach to IC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10011342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100113422023-03-15 Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis Koeckerling, David Raguindin, Peter Francis Kastrati, Lum Bernhard, Sarah Barker, Joseph Quiroga Centeno, Andrea Carolina Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza Khatami, Farnaz Niehot, Christa Lejay, Anne Szeberin, Zoltan Behrendt, Christian-Alexander Nordanstig, Joakim Muka, Taulant Baumgartner, Iris Eur Heart J Meta-Analysis AIMS: Optimal endovascular management of intermittent claudication (IC) remains disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety outcomes for balloon angioplasty (BA), bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents, and atherectomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials (RCT) from inception through November 2021. Efficacy outcomes were primary patency, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and quality-of-life (QoL). Safety endpoints were all-cause mortality and major amputation. Outcomes were evaluated at short-term (<1 year), mid-term (1–2 years), and long-term (≥2 years) follow-up. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021292639). Fifty-one RCTs enrolling 8430 patients/lesions were included. In femoropopliteal disease of low-to-intermediate complexity, DCBs were associated with higher likelihood of primary patency [short-term: odds ratio (OR) 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44–4.24; long-term: OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.93–3.16], lower TLR (short-term: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22–0.49; long-term: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29–0.60) and similar all-cause mortality risk, compared with BA. Primary stenting using BMS was associated with improved short-to-mid-term patency and TLR, but similar long-term efficacy compared with provisional stenting. Mid-term patency (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.89–3.03) and TLR (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22–1.11) estimates were comparable for DES vs. BMS. Atherectomy, used independently or adjunctively, was not associated with efficacy benefits compared with drug-coated and uncoated angioplasty, or stenting approaches. Paucity and heterogeneity of data precluded pooled analysis for aortoiliac disease and QoL endpoints. CONCLUSION: Certain devices may provide benefits in femoropopliteal disease, but comparative data in aortoiliac arteries is lacking. Gaps in evidence quantity and quality impede identification of the optimal endovascular approach to IC. Oxford University Press 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10011342/ /pubmed/36721954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac722 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Koeckerling, David
Raguindin, Peter Francis
Kastrati, Lum
Bernhard, Sarah
Barker, Joseph
Quiroga Centeno, Andrea Carolina
Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza
Khatami, Farnaz
Niehot, Christa
Lejay, Anne
Szeberin, Zoltan
Behrendt, Christian-Alexander
Nordanstig, Joakim
Muka, Taulant
Baumgartner, Iris
Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis
title Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis
title_full Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis
title_short Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis
title_sort endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10011342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac722
work_keys_str_mv AT koeckerlingdavid endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT raguindinpeterfrancis endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT kastratilum endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT bernhardsarah endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT barkerjoseph endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT quirogacentenoandreacarolina endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT raeisidehkordihamidreza endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT khatamifarnaz endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT niehotchrista endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT lejayanne endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT szeberinzoltan endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT behrendtchristianalexander endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT nordanstigjoakim endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT mukataulant endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis
AT baumgartneriris endovascularrevascularizationstrategiesforaortoiliacandfemoropoplitealarterydiseaseametaanalysis