Cargando…

Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the standardized interconception and preconception screening tools for reproductive health needs that are applicable in general outpatient clinical practice. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: This systematic review identifies research on pregnancy intention screenin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Megan, Shireman, Hannah, VanGompel, Emily White, Bello, Jennifer K., Carlock, Francesca, McHugh, Ashley, Stulberg, Debra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36573542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14123
_version_ 1784906570915643392
author Ren, Megan
Shireman, Hannah
VanGompel, Emily White
Bello, Jennifer K.
Carlock, Francesca
McHugh, Ashley
Stulberg, Debra
author_facet Ren, Megan
Shireman, Hannah
VanGompel, Emily White
Bello, Jennifer K.
Carlock, Francesca
McHugh, Ashley
Stulberg, Debra
author_sort Ren, Megan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the standardized interconception and preconception screening tools for reproductive health needs that are applicable in general outpatient clinical practice. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: This systematic review identifies research on pregnancy intention screening and counseling tools, and standardized approaches to preconception and interconception care. We focus on tools designed for clinical settings, but also include research tools with potential for clinical implementation. These tools may include a component of contraceptive counseling, but those focusing solely on contraceptive counseling were excluded. Data were collected from studies done in the United States between January 2000 and March 2022. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic literature search to generate a list of unique tools, assessed the quality of evidence supporting each tool, and described the peer‐reviewed clinical applications of each. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to appraise the quality of individual studies. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases for standardized preconception and interconception health screening tools published in English from January 2000 through March 2022. We used keywords “preconception care,” “interconception care,” “family planning,” “contraception,” “reproductive health services,” and “counseling.” Utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines, we screened titles and abstracts to identify studies for full text review. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The search resulted in 15,399 studies. After removing 4172 duplicates, we screened 11,227 titles/abstracts and advanced 207 for full‐text review. From these, we identified 53 eligible studies representing 22 tools/standardized approaches, of which 10 had evidence from randomized clinical trials. These ranged widely in design, setting, and population of study. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have a choice of tools when implementing standard reproductive screening services. A growing body of research can inform the selection of an appropriate tool, and more study is needed to establish effects on long‐term patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10012234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100122342023-03-15 Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review Ren, Megan Shireman, Hannah VanGompel, Emily White Bello, Jennifer K. Carlock, Francesca McHugh, Ashley Stulberg, Debra Health Serv Res Reproductive Health OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the standardized interconception and preconception screening tools for reproductive health needs that are applicable in general outpatient clinical practice. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: This systematic review identifies research on pregnancy intention screening and counseling tools, and standardized approaches to preconception and interconception care. We focus on tools designed for clinical settings, but also include research tools with potential for clinical implementation. These tools may include a component of contraceptive counseling, but those focusing solely on contraceptive counseling were excluded. Data were collected from studies done in the United States between January 2000 and March 2022. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic literature search to generate a list of unique tools, assessed the quality of evidence supporting each tool, and described the peer‐reviewed clinical applications of each. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to appraise the quality of individual studies. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases for standardized preconception and interconception health screening tools published in English from January 2000 through March 2022. We used keywords “preconception care,” “interconception care,” “family planning,” “contraception,” “reproductive health services,” and “counseling.” Utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines, we screened titles and abstracts to identify studies for full text review. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The search resulted in 15,399 studies. After removing 4172 duplicates, we screened 11,227 titles/abstracts and advanced 207 for full‐text review. From these, we identified 53 eligible studies representing 22 tools/standardized approaches, of which 10 had evidence from randomized clinical trials. These ranged widely in design, setting, and population of study. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have a choice of tools when implementing standard reproductive screening services. A growing body of research can inform the selection of an appropriate tool, and more study is needed to establish effects on long‐term patient outcomes. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023-01-06 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10012234/ /pubmed/36573542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14123 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Services Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reproductive Health
Ren, Megan
Shireman, Hannah
VanGompel, Emily White
Bello, Jennifer K.
Carlock, Francesca
McHugh, Ashley
Stulberg, Debra
Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review
title Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review
title_full Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review
title_fullStr Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review
title_short Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review
title_sort preconception, interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: a systematic review
topic Reproductive Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36573542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14123
work_keys_str_mv AT renmegan preconceptioninterconceptionandreproductivehealthscreeningtoolsasystematicreview
AT shiremanhannah preconceptioninterconceptionandreproductivehealthscreeningtoolsasystematicreview
AT vangompelemilywhite preconceptioninterconceptionandreproductivehealthscreeningtoolsasystematicreview
AT bellojenniferk preconceptioninterconceptionandreproductivehealthscreeningtoolsasystematicreview
AT carlockfrancesca preconceptioninterconceptionandreproductivehealthscreeningtoolsasystematicreview
AT mchughashley preconceptioninterconceptionandreproductivehealthscreeningtoolsasystematicreview
AT stulbergdebra preconceptioninterconceptionandreproductivehealthscreeningtoolsasystematicreview