Cargando…

The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: To update a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and further explore the outcome of IV vitamin C (IVVC) administration in sepsis or septic shock patients. METHODS: This study is a meta-analysis of RCTs. The RCTs of vitamin C therapy in sepsis or septic shock were searched...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Baofang, Su, Jianwei, Shao, Hanquan, Chen, Huiying, Xie, Baocheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y
_version_ 1784906634177282048
author Liang, Baofang
Su, Jianwei
Shao, Hanquan
Chen, Huiying
Xie, Baocheng
author_facet Liang, Baofang
Su, Jianwei
Shao, Hanquan
Chen, Huiying
Xie, Baocheng
author_sort Liang, Baofang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To update a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and further explore the outcome of IV vitamin C (IVVC) administration in sepsis or septic shock patients. METHODS: This study is a meta-analysis of RCTs. The RCTs of vitamin C therapy in sepsis or septic shock were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Clinical Trials.gov from inception to January 16, 2023. We registered the protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022354875). The primary outcome was delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72–96 h. Two reviewers independently assessed RCTs according to eligibility criteria: (1) study type: RCT; (2) patient population: patients ≥ 18 years with sepsis or septic shock; (3) intervention: IVVC at any doses as monotherapy or combined with thiamine or and hydrocortisone compared with standard of care, no intervention or placebo (defined as control group); (4) the RCT described short-term mortality or SOFA score. Then, two authors independently extracted related information from RCTs. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs (n = 3364 patients) were identified in this meta-analysis. There were significant effects in the delta SOFA score from baseline to 72–96 h (MD, − 0.62; 95% CI, − 1.00 to − 0.25; p = 0.001) and the duration of vasopressor use (MD, − 15.07; 95% CI, − 21.59 to − 8.55; p < 0.00001) with IVVC therapy. Treatment with IVVC was not shown to improve short-term mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; p = 0.14); nevertheless, dose at 25–100 mg/kg/d subgroup associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.03). An increase adverse event was observed in IVVC therapy (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.68; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, IVVC in sepsis or septic shock patients significantly improved delta SOFA score and reduced the duration of vasopressor use, whereas it was not associated with reduction in short-term mortality and had higher adverse events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10012592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100125922023-03-15 The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Liang, Baofang Su, Jianwei Shao, Hanquan Chen, Huiying Xie, Baocheng Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: To update a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and further explore the outcome of IV vitamin C (IVVC) administration in sepsis or septic shock patients. METHODS: This study is a meta-analysis of RCTs. The RCTs of vitamin C therapy in sepsis or septic shock were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Clinical Trials.gov from inception to January 16, 2023. We registered the protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022354875). The primary outcome was delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72–96 h. Two reviewers independently assessed RCTs according to eligibility criteria: (1) study type: RCT; (2) patient population: patients ≥ 18 years with sepsis or septic shock; (3) intervention: IVVC at any doses as monotherapy or combined with thiamine or and hydrocortisone compared with standard of care, no intervention or placebo (defined as control group); (4) the RCT described short-term mortality or SOFA score. Then, two authors independently extracted related information from RCTs. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs (n = 3364 patients) were identified in this meta-analysis. There were significant effects in the delta SOFA score from baseline to 72–96 h (MD, − 0.62; 95% CI, − 1.00 to − 0.25; p = 0.001) and the duration of vasopressor use (MD, − 15.07; 95% CI, − 21.59 to − 8.55; p < 0.00001) with IVVC therapy. Treatment with IVVC was not shown to improve short-term mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; p = 0.14); nevertheless, dose at 25–100 mg/kg/d subgroup associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.03). An increase adverse event was observed in IVVC therapy (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.68; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, IVVC in sepsis or septic shock patients significantly improved delta SOFA score and reduced the duration of vasopressor use, whereas it was not associated with reduction in short-term mortality and had higher adverse events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y. BioMed Central 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10012592/ /pubmed/36915173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liang, Baofang
Su, Jianwei
Shao, Hanquan
Chen, Huiying
Xie, Baocheng
The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort outcome of iv vitamin c therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liangbaofang theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sujianwei theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shaohanquan theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenhuiying theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiebaocheng theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liangbaofang outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sujianwei outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shaohanquan outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenhuiying outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiebaocheng outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials