Cargando…
The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: To update a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and further explore the outcome of IV vitamin C (IVVC) administration in sepsis or septic shock patients. METHODS: This study is a meta-analysis of RCTs. The RCTs of vitamin C therapy in sepsis or septic shock were searched...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y |
_version_ | 1784906634177282048 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Baofang Su, Jianwei Shao, Hanquan Chen, Huiying Xie, Baocheng |
author_facet | Liang, Baofang Su, Jianwei Shao, Hanquan Chen, Huiying Xie, Baocheng |
author_sort | Liang, Baofang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To update a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and further explore the outcome of IV vitamin C (IVVC) administration in sepsis or septic shock patients. METHODS: This study is a meta-analysis of RCTs. The RCTs of vitamin C therapy in sepsis or septic shock were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Clinical Trials.gov from inception to January 16, 2023. We registered the protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022354875). The primary outcome was delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72–96 h. Two reviewers independently assessed RCTs according to eligibility criteria: (1) study type: RCT; (2) patient population: patients ≥ 18 years with sepsis or septic shock; (3) intervention: IVVC at any doses as monotherapy or combined with thiamine or and hydrocortisone compared with standard of care, no intervention or placebo (defined as control group); (4) the RCT described short-term mortality or SOFA score. Then, two authors independently extracted related information from RCTs. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs (n = 3364 patients) were identified in this meta-analysis. There were significant effects in the delta SOFA score from baseline to 72–96 h (MD, − 0.62; 95% CI, − 1.00 to − 0.25; p = 0.001) and the duration of vasopressor use (MD, − 15.07; 95% CI, − 21.59 to − 8.55; p < 0.00001) with IVVC therapy. Treatment with IVVC was not shown to improve short-term mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; p = 0.14); nevertheless, dose at 25–100 mg/kg/d subgroup associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.03). An increase adverse event was observed in IVVC therapy (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.68; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, IVVC in sepsis or septic shock patients significantly improved delta SOFA score and reduced the duration of vasopressor use, whereas it was not associated with reduction in short-term mortality and had higher adverse events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10012592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100125922023-03-15 The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Liang, Baofang Su, Jianwei Shao, Hanquan Chen, Huiying Xie, Baocheng Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: To update a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and further explore the outcome of IV vitamin C (IVVC) administration in sepsis or septic shock patients. METHODS: This study is a meta-analysis of RCTs. The RCTs of vitamin C therapy in sepsis or septic shock were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Clinical Trials.gov from inception to January 16, 2023. We registered the protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022354875). The primary outcome was delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72–96 h. Two reviewers independently assessed RCTs according to eligibility criteria: (1) study type: RCT; (2) patient population: patients ≥ 18 years with sepsis or septic shock; (3) intervention: IVVC at any doses as monotherapy or combined with thiamine or and hydrocortisone compared with standard of care, no intervention or placebo (defined as control group); (4) the RCT described short-term mortality or SOFA score. Then, two authors independently extracted related information from RCTs. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs (n = 3364 patients) were identified in this meta-analysis. There were significant effects in the delta SOFA score from baseline to 72–96 h (MD, − 0.62; 95% CI, − 1.00 to − 0.25; p = 0.001) and the duration of vasopressor use (MD, − 15.07; 95% CI, − 21.59 to − 8.55; p < 0.00001) with IVVC therapy. Treatment with IVVC was not shown to improve short-term mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; p = 0.14); nevertheless, dose at 25–100 mg/kg/d subgroup associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.03). An increase adverse event was observed in IVVC therapy (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.68; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, IVVC in sepsis or septic shock patients significantly improved delta SOFA score and reduced the duration of vasopressor use, whereas it was not associated with reduction in short-term mortality and had higher adverse events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y. BioMed Central 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10012592/ /pubmed/36915173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Liang, Baofang Su, Jianwei Shao, Hanquan Chen, Huiying Xie, Baocheng The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | outcome of iv vitamin c therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangbaofang theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sujianwei theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shaohanquan theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenhuiying theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xiebaocheng theoutcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liangbaofang outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sujianwei outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shaohanquan outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenhuiying outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xiebaocheng outcomeofivvitaminctherapyinpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |