Cargando…

Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies

This article provides new reflections and recommendations from authors of the initial effectiveness-implementation hybrid study manuscript and additional experts in their conceptualization and application. Given the widespread and continued use of hybrid studies, critical appraisals are necessary. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curran, Geoffrey M., Landes, Sara J., McBain, Sacha A., Pyne, Jeffrey M., Smith, Justin D., Fernandez, Maria E., Chambers, David A., Mittman, Brian S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36925811
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1053496
_version_ 1784906653155459072
author Curran, Geoffrey M.
Landes, Sara J.
McBain, Sacha A.
Pyne, Jeffrey M.
Smith, Justin D.
Fernandez, Maria E.
Chambers, David A.
Mittman, Brian S.
author_facet Curran, Geoffrey M.
Landes, Sara J.
McBain, Sacha A.
Pyne, Jeffrey M.
Smith, Justin D.
Fernandez, Maria E.
Chambers, David A.
Mittman, Brian S.
author_sort Curran, Geoffrey M.
collection PubMed
description This article provides new reflections and recommendations from authors of the initial effectiveness-implementation hybrid study manuscript and additional experts in their conceptualization and application. Given the widespread and continued use of hybrid studies, critical appraisals are necessary. The article offers reflections across five conceptual and methodological areas. It begins with the recommendation to replace the term “design” in favor of “study.” The use of the term “design” and the explicit focus on trial methodology in the original paper created confusion. The essence of hybrid studies is combining research questions concerning intervention effectiveness and implementation within the same study, and this can and should be achieved by applying a full range of research designs. Supporting this recommendation, the article then offers guidance on selecting a hybrid study type based on evidentiary and contextual information and stakeholder concerns/preferences. A series of questions are presented that have been designed to help investigators select the most appropriate hybrid type for their study situation. The article also provides a critique on the hybrid 1-2-3 typology and offers reflections on when and how to use the typology moving forward. Further, the article offers recommendations on research designs that align with each hybrid study type. Lastly, the article offers thoughts on how to integrate costs analyses into hybrid studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10012680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100126802023-03-15 Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies Curran, Geoffrey M. Landes, Sara J. McBain, Sacha A. Pyne, Jeffrey M. Smith, Justin D. Fernandez, Maria E. Chambers, David A. Mittman, Brian S. Front Health Serv Health Services This article provides new reflections and recommendations from authors of the initial effectiveness-implementation hybrid study manuscript and additional experts in their conceptualization and application. Given the widespread and continued use of hybrid studies, critical appraisals are necessary. The article offers reflections across five conceptual and methodological areas. It begins with the recommendation to replace the term “design” in favor of “study.” The use of the term “design” and the explicit focus on trial methodology in the original paper created confusion. The essence of hybrid studies is combining research questions concerning intervention effectiveness and implementation within the same study, and this can and should be achieved by applying a full range of research designs. Supporting this recommendation, the article then offers guidance on selecting a hybrid study type based on evidentiary and contextual information and stakeholder concerns/preferences. A series of questions are presented that have been designed to help investigators select the most appropriate hybrid type for their study situation. The article also provides a critique on the hybrid 1-2-3 typology and offers reflections on when and how to use the typology moving forward. Further, the article offers recommendations on research designs that align with each hybrid study type. Lastly, the article offers thoughts on how to integrate costs analyses into hybrid studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10012680/ /pubmed/36925811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1053496 Text en Copyright © 2022 Curran, Landes, McBain, Pyne, Smith, Fernandez, Chambers and Mittman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Health Services
Curran, Geoffrey M.
Landes, Sara J.
McBain, Sacha A.
Pyne, Jeffrey M.
Smith, Justin D.
Fernandez, Maria E.
Chambers, David A.
Mittman, Brian S.
Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies
title Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies
title_full Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies
title_fullStr Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies
title_full_unstemmed Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies
title_short Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies
title_sort reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies
topic Health Services
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36925811
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1053496
work_keys_str_mv AT currangeoffreym reflectionson10yearsofeffectivenessimplementationhybridstudies
AT landessaraj reflectionson10yearsofeffectivenessimplementationhybridstudies
AT mcbainsachaa reflectionson10yearsofeffectivenessimplementationhybridstudies
AT pynejeffreym reflectionson10yearsofeffectivenessimplementationhybridstudies
AT smithjustind reflectionson10yearsofeffectivenessimplementationhybridstudies
AT fernandezmariae reflectionson10yearsofeffectivenessimplementationhybridstudies
AT chambersdavida reflectionson10yearsofeffectivenessimplementationhybridstudies
AT mittmanbrians reflectionson10yearsofeffectivenessimplementationhybridstudies