Cargando…
Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings
BACKGROUND: Within many public health settings, there remain large challenges to sustaining evidence-based practices. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool has been developed and validated to measure sustainability capacity of public health, social service, and educational programs. This paper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36925881 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1004167 |
_version_ | 1784906676460060672 |
---|---|
author | Bacon, Caren Malone, Sara Prewitt, Kim Hackett, Rachel Hastings, Molly Dexter, Sarah Luke, Douglas A. |
author_facet | Bacon, Caren Malone, Sara Prewitt, Kim Hackett, Rachel Hastings, Molly Dexter, Sarah Luke, Douglas A. |
author_sort | Bacon, Caren |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Within many public health settings, there remain large challenges to sustaining evidence-based practices. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool has been developed and validated to measure sustainability capacity of public health, social service, and educational programs. This paper describes how this tool was utilized between January 2014 and January 2019. We describe characteristics of programs that are associated with increased capacity for sustainability and ultimately describe the utility of the PSAT in sustainability research and practice. METHODS: The PSAT is comprised of 8 subscales, measuring sustainability capacity in eight distinct conceptual domains. Each subscale is made up of five items, all assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. Data were obtained from persons who used the PSAT on the online website (https://sustaintool.org/), from 2014 to 2019. In addition to the PSAT scale, participants were asked about four program-level characteristics. The resulting dataset includes 5,706 individual assessments reporting on 2,892 programs. RESULTS: The mean overall PSAT score was 4.73, with the lowest and highest scoring subscales being funding stability and program adaptation, respectively. Internal consistency for each subscale was excellent (average Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94). Confirmatory factor analysis highlighted good to excellent fit of the PSAT measurement model (eight distinct conceptual domains) to the observed data, with a comparative fit index of 0.902, root mean square error of approximation equal to 0.054, and standardized root mean square residual of 0.054. Overall sustainability capacity was significantly related to program size (F = 25.6; p < 0.001). Specifically, smaller programs (with staff sizes of ten or below) consistently reported lower program sustainability capacity. Capacity was not associated with program age and did not vary significantly by program level. DISCUSSION: The PSAT maintained its excellent reliability when tested with a large and diverse sample over time. Initial criterion validity was explored through the assessment of program characteristics, including program type and program size. The data collected reinforces the ability of the PSAT to assess sustainability capacity for a wide variety of public health and social programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10012779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100127792023-03-15 Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings Bacon, Caren Malone, Sara Prewitt, Kim Hackett, Rachel Hastings, Molly Dexter, Sarah Luke, Douglas A. Front Health Serv Health Services BACKGROUND: Within many public health settings, there remain large challenges to sustaining evidence-based practices. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool has been developed and validated to measure sustainability capacity of public health, social service, and educational programs. This paper describes how this tool was utilized between January 2014 and January 2019. We describe characteristics of programs that are associated with increased capacity for sustainability and ultimately describe the utility of the PSAT in sustainability research and practice. METHODS: The PSAT is comprised of 8 subscales, measuring sustainability capacity in eight distinct conceptual domains. Each subscale is made up of five items, all assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. Data were obtained from persons who used the PSAT on the online website (https://sustaintool.org/), from 2014 to 2019. In addition to the PSAT scale, participants were asked about four program-level characteristics. The resulting dataset includes 5,706 individual assessments reporting on 2,892 programs. RESULTS: The mean overall PSAT score was 4.73, with the lowest and highest scoring subscales being funding stability and program adaptation, respectively. Internal consistency for each subscale was excellent (average Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94). Confirmatory factor analysis highlighted good to excellent fit of the PSAT measurement model (eight distinct conceptual domains) to the observed data, with a comparative fit index of 0.902, root mean square error of approximation equal to 0.054, and standardized root mean square residual of 0.054. Overall sustainability capacity was significantly related to program size (F = 25.6; p < 0.001). Specifically, smaller programs (with staff sizes of ten or below) consistently reported lower program sustainability capacity. Capacity was not associated with program age and did not vary significantly by program level. DISCUSSION: The PSAT maintained its excellent reliability when tested with a large and diverse sample over time. Initial criterion validity was explored through the assessment of program characteristics, including program type and program size. The data collected reinforces the ability of the PSAT to assess sustainability capacity for a wide variety of public health and social programs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10012779/ /pubmed/36925881 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1004167 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bacon, Malone, Prewitt, Hackett, Hastings, Dexter and Luke. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Bacon, Caren Malone, Sara Prewitt, Kim Hackett, Rachel Hastings, Molly Dexter, Sarah Luke, Douglas A. Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings |
title | Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings |
title_full | Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings |
title_fullStr | Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings |
title_short | Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings |
title_sort | assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings |
topic | Health Services |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36925881 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1004167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baconcaren assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings AT malonesara assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings AT prewittkim assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings AT hackettrachel assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings AT hastingsmolly assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings AT dextersarah assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings AT lukedouglasa assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings |