Cargando…

Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings

BACKGROUND: Within many public health settings, there remain large challenges to sustaining evidence-based practices. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool has been developed and validated to measure sustainability capacity of public health, social service, and educational programs. This paper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bacon, Caren, Malone, Sara, Prewitt, Kim, Hackett, Rachel, Hastings, Molly, Dexter, Sarah, Luke, Douglas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36925881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1004167
_version_ 1784906676460060672
author Bacon, Caren
Malone, Sara
Prewitt, Kim
Hackett, Rachel
Hastings, Molly
Dexter, Sarah
Luke, Douglas A.
author_facet Bacon, Caren
Malone, Sara
Prewitt, Kim
Hackett, Rachel
Hastings, Molly
Dexter, Sarah
Luke, Douglas A.
author_sort Bacon, Caren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Within many public health settings, there remain large challenges to sustaining evidence-based practices. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool has been developed and validated to measure sustainability capacity of public health, social service, and educational programs. This paper describes how this tool was utilized between January 2014 and January 2019. We describe characteristics of programs that are associated with increased capacity for sustainability and ultimately describe the utility of the PSAT in sustainability research and practice. METHODS: The PSAT is comprised of 8 subscales, measuring sustainability capacity in eight distinct conceptual domains. Each subscale is made up of five items, all assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. Data were obtained from persons who used the PSAT on the online website (https://sustaintool.org/), from 2014 to 2019. In addition to the PSAT scale, participants were asked about four program-level characteristics. The resulting dataset includes 5,706 individual assessments reporting on 2,892 programs. RESULTS: The mean overall PSAT score was 4.73, with the lowest and highest scoring subscales being funding stability and program adaptation, respectively. Internal consistency for each subscale was excellent (average Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94). Confirmatory factor analysis highlighted good to excellent fit of the PSAT measurement model (eight distinct conceptual domains) to the observed data, with a comparative fit index of 0.902, root mean square error of approximation equal to 0.054, and standardized root mean square residual of 0.054. Overall sustainability capacity was significantly related to program size (F = 25.6; p < 0.001). Specifically, smaller programs (with staff sizes of ten or below) consistently reported lower program sustainability capacity. Capacity was not associated with program age and did not vary significantly by program level. DISCUSSION: The PSAT maintained its excellent reliability when tested with a large and diverse sample over time. Initial criterion validity was explored through the assessment of program characteristics, including program type and program size. The data collected reinforces the ability of the PSAT to assess sustainability capacity for a wide variety of public health and social programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10012779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100127792023-03-15 Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings Bacon, Caren Malone, Sara Prewitt, Kim Hackett, Rachel Hastings, Molly Dexter, Sarah Luke, Douglas A. Front Health Serv Health Services BACKGROUND: Within many public health settings, there remain large challenges to sustaining evidence-based practices. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool has been developed and validated to measure sustainability capacity of public health, social service, and educational programs. This paper describes how this tool was utilized between January 2014 and January 2019. We describe characteristics of programs that are associated with increased capacity for sustainability and ultimately describe the utility of the PSAT in sustainability research and practice. METHODS: The PSAT is comprised of 8 subscales, measuring sustainability capacity in eight distinct conceptual domains. Each subscale is made up of five items, all assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. Data were obtained from persons who used the PSAT on the online website (https://sustaintool.org/), from 2014 to 2019. In addition to the PSAT scale, participants were asked about four program-level characteristics. The resulting dataset includes 5,706 individual assessments reporting on 2,892 programs. RESULTS: The mean overall PSAT score was 4.73, with the lowest and highest scoring subscales being funding stability and program adaptation, respectively. Internal consistency for each subscale was excellent (average Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94). Confirmatory factor analysis highlighted good to excellent fit of the PSAT measurement model (eight distinct conceptual domains) to the observed data, with a comparative fit index of 0.902, root mean square error of approximation equal to 0.054, and standardized root mean square residual of 0.054. Overall sustainability capacity was significantly related to program size (F = 25.6; p < 0.001). Specifically, smaller programs (with staff sizes of ten or below) consistently reported lower program sustainability capacity. Capacity was not associated with program age and did not vary significantly by program level. DISCUSSION: The PSAT maintained its excellent reliability when tested with a large and diverse sample over time. Initial criterion validity was explored through the assessment of program characteristics, including program type and program size. The data collected reinforces the ability of the PSAT to assess sustainability capacity for a wide variety of public health and social programs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10012779/ /pubmed/36925881 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1004167 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bacon, Malone, Prewitt, Hackett, Hastings, Dexter and Luke. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Health Services
Bacon, Caren
Malone, Sara
Prewitt, Kim
Hackett, Rachel
Hastings, Molly
Dexter, Sarah
Luke, Douglas A.
Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings
title Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings
title_full Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings
title_fullStr Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings
title_short Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings
title_sort assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings
topic Health Services
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36925881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1004167
work_keys_str_mv AT baconcaren assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings
AT malonesara assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings
AT prewittkim assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings
AT hackettrachel assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings
AT hastingsmolly assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings
AT dextersarah assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings
AT lukedouglasa assessingthesustainabilitycapacityofevidencebasedprogramsincommunityandhealthsettings