Cargando…
Designing healthcare for human use: Human factors and practical considerations for the translational process
In recent years, the focus of implementation science (IS) shifted to emphasize the influence of contextual factors on intervention adaptations in clinical, community, and corporate settings. Each of these settings represent a unique work system with varying contexts that influence human capabilities...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36925891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.981450 |
_version_ | 1784906687103107072 |
---|---|
author | Edwards III, G. Franklin Zagarese, Vivian Tulk Jesso, Stephanie Jesso, Matthew Harden, Samantha M. Parker, Sarah Henrickson |
author_facet | Edwards III, G. Franklin Zagarese, Vivian Tulk Jesso, Stephanie Jesso, Matthew Harden, Samantha M. Parker, Sarah Henrickson |
author_sort | Edwards III, G. Franklin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, the focus of implementation science (IS) shifted to emphasize the influence of contextual factors on intervention adaptations in clinical, community, and corporate settings. Each of these settings represent a unique work system with varying contexts that influence human capabilities, needs, and performance (otherwise known as “human factors”). The ease of human interaction with a work system or an intervention is imperative to IS outcomes, particularly adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Both scientific approaches consider the “big picture” when designing interventions for users and stakeholders to improve work and health outcomes. IS and human factors are therefore complementary in nature. In this paper, the authors will (1) provide perspective on the synergistic relationship between human factors and IS using two illustrative and applied cases and (2) outline practical considerations for human factors-based strategies to identify contextual factors that influence intervention adoption, implementation, and maintenance dimensions of the RE-AIM framework. This article expands on recent research that developed user- and human-centered design strategies for IS scientists to use. However, defining the complementary relationship between IS and human factors is a necessary and valuable step in maximizing the effectiveness of IS to transform healthcare. While IS can complement practitioners' identification of intervention adaptations, human interaction is a process in the work system often overlooked throughout implementation. Further work is needed to address the influence that organizational endorsement and trust have on intervention adaptations and their translation into the work system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10012824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100128242023-03-15 Designing healthcare for human use: Human factors and practical considerations for the translational process Edwards III, G. Franklin Zagarese, Vivian Tulk Jesso, Stephanie Jesso, Matthew Harden, Samantha M. Parker, Sarah Henrickson Front Health Serv Health Services In recent years, the focus of implementation science (IS) shifted to emphasize the influence of contextual factors on intervention adaptations in clinical, community, and corporate settings. Each of these settings represent a unique work system with varying contexts that influence human capabilities, needs, and performance (otherwise known as “human factors”). The ease of human interaction with a work system or an intervention is imperative to IS outcomes, particularly adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Both scientific approaches consider the “big picture” when designing interventions for users and stakeholders to improve work and health outcomes. IS and human factors are therefore complementary in nature. In this paper, the authors will (1) provide perspective on the synergistic relationship between human factors and IS using two illustrative and applied cases and (2) outline practical considerations for human factors-based strategies to identify contextual factors that influence intervention adoption, implementation, and maintenance dimensions of the RE-AIM framework. This article expands on recent research that developed user- and human-centered design strategies for IS scientists to use. However, defining the complementary relationship between IS and human factors is a necessary and valuable step in maximizing the effectiveness of IS to transform healthcare. While IS can complement practitioners' identification of intervention adaptations, human interaction is a process in the work system often overlooked throughout implementation. Further work is needed to address the influence that organizational endorsement and trust have on intervention adaptations and their translation into the work system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10012824/ /pubmed/36925891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.981450 Text en © 2023 Edwards, Zagarese, Tulk Jesso, Jesso, Harden and Parker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Edwards III, G. Franklin Zagarese, Vivian Tulk Jesso, Stephanie Jesso, Matthew Harden, Samantha M. Parker, Sarah Henrickson Designing healthcare for human use: Human factors and practical considerations for the translational process |
title | Designing healthcare for human use: Human factors and practical considerations for the translational process |
title_full | Designing healthcare for human use: Human factors and practical considerations for the translational process |
title_fullStr | Designing healthcare for human use: Human factors and practical considerations for the translational process |
title_full_unstemmed | Designing healthcare for human use: Human factors and practical considerations for the translational process |
title_short | Designing healthcare for human use: Human factors and practical considerations for the translational process |
title_sort | designing healthcare for human use: human factors and practical considerations for the translational process |
topic | Health Services |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36925891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.981450 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edwardsiiigfranklin designinghealthcareforhumanusehumanfactorsandpracticalconsiderationsforthetranslationalprocess AT zagaresevivian designinghealthcareforhumanusehumanfactorsandpracticalconsiderationsforthetranslationalprocess AT tulkjessostephanie designinghealthcareforhumanusehumanfactorsandpracticalconsiderationsforthetranslationalprocess AT jessomatthew designinghealthcareforhumanusehumanfactorsandpracticalconsiderationsforthetranslationalprocess AT hardensamantham designinghealthcareforhumanusehumanfactorsandpracticalconsiderationsforthetranslationalprocess AT parkersarahhenrickson designinghealthcareforhumanusehumanfactorsandpracticalconsiderationsforthetranslationalprocess |