Cargando…

The Reconstruction of Causal Networks in Physiology

We systematically compare strengths and weaknesses of two methods that can be used to quantify causal links between time series: Granger-causality and Bivariate Phase Rectified Signal Averaging (BPRSA). While a statistical test method for Granger-causality has already been established, we show that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Günther, Moritz, Kantelhardt, Jan W., Bartsch, Ronny P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36926108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2022.893743
_version_ 1784906733732233216
author Günther, Moritz
Kantelhardt, Jan W.
Bartsch, Ronny P.
author_facet Günther, Moritz
Kantelhardt, Jan W.
Bartsch, Ronny P.
author_sort Günther, Moritz
collection PubMed
description We systematically compare strengths and weaknesses of two methods that can be used to quantify causal links between time series: Granger-causality and Bivariate Phase Rectified Signal Averaging (BPRSA). While a statistical test method for Granger-causality has already been established, we show that BPRSA causality can also be probed with existing statistical tests. Our results indicate that more data or stronger interactions are required for the BPRSA method than for the Granger-causality method to detect an existing link. Furthermore, the Granger-causality method can distinguish direct causal links from indirect links as well as links that arise from a common source, while BPRSA cannot. However, in contrast to Granger-causality, BPRSA is suited for the analysis of non-stationary data. We demonstrate the practicability of the Granger-causality method by applying it to polysomnography data from sleep laboratories. An algorithm is presented, which addresses the stationarity condition of Granger-causality by splitting non-stationary data into shorter segments until they pass a stationarity test. We reconstruct causal networks of heart rate, breathing rate, and EEG amplitude from young healthy subjects, elderly healthy subjects, and subjects with obstructive sleep apnea, a condition that leads to disruption of normal respiration during sleep. These networks exhibit differences not only between different sleep stages, but also between young and elderly healthy subjects on the one hand and subjects with sleep apnea on the other hand. Among these differences are 1) weaker interactions in all groups between heart rate, breathing rate and EEG amplitude during deep sleep, compared to light and REM sleep, 2) a stronger causal link from heart rate to breathing rate but disturbances in respiratory sinus arrhythmia (breathing to heart rate coupling) in subjects with sleep apnea, 3) a stronger causal link from EEG amplitude to breathing rate during REM sleep in subjects with sleep apnea. The Granger-causality method, although initially developed for econometric purposes, can provide a quantitative, testable measure for causality in physiological networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10013035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100130352023-03-15 The Reconstruction of Causal Networks in Physiology Günther, Moritz Kantelhardt, Jan W. Bartsch, Ronny P. Front Netw Physiol Network Physiology We systematically compare strengths and weaknesses of two methods that can be used to quantify causal links between time series: Granger-causality and Bivariate Phase Rectified Signal Averaging (BPRSA). While a statistical test method for Granger-causality has already been established, we show that BPRSA causality can also be probed with existing statistical tests. Our results indicate that more data or stronger interactions are required for the BPRSA method than for the Granger-causality method to detect an existing link. Furthermore, the Granger-causality method can distinguish direct causal links from indirect links as well as links that arise from a common source, while BPRSA cannot. However, in contrast to Granger-causality, BPRSA is suited for the analysis of non-stationary data. We demonstrate the practicability of the Granger-causality method by applying it to polysomnography data from sleep laboratories. An algorithm is presented, which addresses the stationarity condition of Granger-causality by splitting non-stationary data into shorter segments until they pass a stationarity test. We reconstruct causal networks of heart rate, breathing rate, and EEG amplitude from young healthy subjects, elderly healthy subjects, and subjects with obstructive sleep apnea, a condition that leads to disruption of normal respiration during sleep. These networks exhibit differences not only between different sleep stages, but also between young and elderly healthy subjects on the one hand and subjects with sleep apnea on the other hand. Among these differences are 1) weaker interactions in all groups between heart rate, breathing rate and EEG amplitude during deep sleep, compared to light and REM sleep, 2) a stronger causal link from heart rate to breathing rate but disturbances in respiratory sinus arrhythmia (breathing to heart rate coupling) in subjects with sleep apnea, 3) a stronger causal link from EEG amplitude to breathing rate during REM sleep in subjects with sleep apnea. The Granger-causality method, although initially developed for econometric purposes, can provide a quantitative, testable measure for causality in physiological networks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10013035/ /pubmed/36926108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2022.893743 Text en Copyright © 2022 Günther, Kantelhardt and Bartsch. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Network Physiology
Günther, Moritz
Kantelhardt, Jan W.
Bartsch, Ronny P.
The Reconstruction of Causal Networks in Physiology
title The Reconstruction of Causal Networks in Physiology
title_full The Reconstruction of Causal Networks in Physiology
title_fullStr The Reconstruction of Causal Networks in Physiology
title_full_unstemmed The Reconstruction of Causal Networks in Physiology
title_short The Reconstruction of Causal Networks in Physiology
title_sort reconstruction of causal networks in physiology
topic Network Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36926108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2022.893743
work_keys_str_mv AT gunthermoritz thereconstructionofcausalnetworksinphysiology
AT kantelhardtjanw thereconstructionofcausalnetworksinphysiology
AT bartschronnyp thereconstructionofcausalnetworksinphysiology
AT gunthermoritz reconstructionofcausalnetworksinphysiology
AT kantelhardtjanw reconstructionofcausalnetworksinphysiology
AT bartschronnyp reconstructionofcausalnetworksinphysiology