Cargando…
Limitations of current spatial ability testing for military aviators
Spatial ability has long been considered an important attribute when identifying military aviators. This paper examines the Direction Orientation Task (DOT), which is currently used by the US military to assess spatial ability in aviation applicants. Several limitations of the test, such as a limite...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013229/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2021.1965786 |
_version_ | 1784906770399887360 |
---|---|
author | Coyne, Joseph T. Dollinger, Sabrina Brown, Noelle Foroughi, Cyrus Sibley, Ciara Phillips, Henry |
author_facet | Coyne, Joseph T. Dollinger, Sabrina Brown, Noelle Foroughi, Cyrus Sibley, Ciara Phillips, Henry |
author_sort | Coyne, Joseph T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spatial ability has long been considered an important attribute when identifying military aviators. This paper examines the Direction Orientation Task (DOT), which is currently used by the US military to assess spatial ability in aviation applicants. Several limitations of the test, such as a limited number of trials and the availability of practice trials online, make it subject to potential ceiling effects. The paper presents historical data of all Naval Aviator applicants over a six-year time period and revealed that 22% of applicants answered 90% or more of the questions correctly. Furthermore, test performance has significantly increased in the years since the test was first administered and there is evidence that DOT is no longer contributing incremental validity. A follow-up empirical study looked at DOT performance and strategy in a group of military student aviators and student air traffic controllers. The results of the empirical investigation reveal that the use of an analytic strategy was associated with higher performance on the DOT, whereas the use of a spatial strategy was not associated with performance. Taken together, the improved performance data over time and the data on strategy use suggest the test’s ability to measure spatial ability may be diminishing, ultimately reducing its construct and incremental validity. This is problematic and should be addressed, since the DOT is the only measure of spatial ability used by the Navy to assess aviation applicants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10013229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100132292023-05-18 Limitations of current spatial ability testing for military aviators Coyne, Joseph T. Dollinger, Sabrina Brown, Noelle Foroughi, Cyrus Sibley, Ciara Phillips, Henry Mil Psychol Research Article Spatial ability has long been considered an important attribute when identifying military aviators. This paper examines the Direction Orientation Task (DOT), which is currently used by the US military to assess spatial ability in aviation applicants. Several limitations of the test, such as a limited number of trials and the availability of practice trials online, make it subject to potential ceiling effects. The paper presents historical data of all Naval Aviator applicants over a six-year time period and revealed that 22% of applicants answered 90% or more of the questions correctly. Furthermore, test performance has significantly increased in the years since the test was first administered and there is evidence that DOT is no longer contributing incremental validity. A follow-up empirical study looked at DOT performance and strategy in a group of military student aviators and student air traffic controllers. The results of the empirical investigation reveal that the use of an analytic strategy was associated with higher performance on the DOT, whereas the use of a spatial strategy was not associated with performance. Taken together, the improved performance data over time and the data on strategy use suggest the test’s ability to measure spatial ability may be diminishing, ultimately reducing its construct and incremental validity. This is problematic and should be addressed, since the DOT is the only measure of spatial ability used by the Navy to assess aviation applicants. Routledge 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10013229/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2021.1965786 Text en This work was authored as part of the Contributor’s official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/This is an Open Access article that has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighbouring rights (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/). You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Coyne, Joseph T. Dollinger, Sabrina Brown, Noelle Foroughi, Cyrus Sibley, Ciara Phillips, Henry Limitations of current spatial ability testing for military aviators |
title | Limitations of current spatial ability testing for military aviators |
title_full | Limitations of current spatial ability testing for military aviators |
title_fullStr | Limitations of current spatial ability testing for military aviators |
title_full_unstemmed | Limitations of current spatial ability testing for military aviators |
title_short | Limitations of current spatial ability testing for military aviators |
title_sort | limitations of current spatial ability testing for military aviators |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013229/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2021.1965786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coynejosepht limitationsofcurrentspatialabilitytestingformilitaryaviators AT dollingersabrina limitationsofcurrentspatialabilitytestingformilitaryaviators AT brownnoelle limitationsofcurrentspatialabilitytestingformilitaryaviators AT foroughicyrus limitationsofcurrentspatialabilitytestingformilitaryaviators AT sibleyciara limitationsofcurrentspatialabilitytestingformilitaryaviators AT phillipshenry limitationsofcurrentspatialabilitytestingformilitaryaviators |