Cargando…

Increase over time of antibody levels 3 months after a booster dose as an indication of better protection against Omicron infection

The third, “booster”, vaccination increases the overall immune response against SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, after the initial peak at around 3 weeks post-vaccination, anti-spike antibody levels decline. Post-booster kinetics of cellular response has been less investigated and there is no documente...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bingula, Rea, Chabrolles, Hélène, Bonnet, Benjamin, Archimbaud, Christine, Brebion, Amélie, Cosme, Justine, Ollier, Amandine, Dutheil, Frédéric, Junda, Maud, Mirand, Audrey, Regagnon, Christel, Vidal, Magali, Henquell, Cécile, Evrard, Bertrand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2184176
_version_ 1784906808618385408
author Bingula, Rea
Chabrolles, Hélène
Bonnet, Benjamin
Archimbaud, Christine
Brebion, Amélie
Cosme, Justine
Ollier, Amandine
Dutheil, Frédéric
Junda, Maud
Mirand, Audrey
Regagnon, Christel
Vidal, Magali
Henquell, Cécile
Evrard, Bertrand
author_facet Bingula, Rea
Chabrolles, Hélène
Bonnet, Benjamin
Archimbaud, Christine
Brebion, Amélie
Cosme, Justine
Ollier, Amandine
Dutheil, Frédéric
Junda, Maud
Mirand, Audrey
Regagnon, Christel
Vidal, Magali
Henquell, Cécile
Evrard, Bertrand
author_sort Bingula, Rea
collection PubMed
description The third, “booster”, vaccination increases the overall immune response against SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, after the initial peak at around 3 weeks post-vaccination, anti-spike antibody levels decline. Post-booster kinetics of cellular response has been less investigated and there is no documented evidence of a true boosting effect. Furthermore, multiple studies underline the less effective immune responses against Omicron, the latest variant of concern, at both humoral and cellular levels. In this letter, we analyse humoral (anti-RBD IgG levels) and cellular (IFN-γ release assay) immune response in 205 health care workers 3 weeks and 3 months after administration of an mRNA-based booster dose, either mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2. Since all subjects were SARS-CoV-2 infection-naïve, we also looked at the incidence of Omicron infection between 3 and 6 months post-booster. At both timepoints, 3x mRNA-1273 vaccination had the highest overall antibody and IFN-γ levels, followed by 3x BNT162b2 vaccination and heterologous mRNA-based regimens. Heterologous ChAdOx1–mRNA-based regimen had the lowest antibody levels while cellular response equal to that of 3x BNT162b2 vaccination and heterologous mRNA-based regimens. Our results show that both humoral and cellular responses waned at 3 months for all vaccination regimens. However, we identified three trajectories of dosage variation. Interestingly, the subgroup of subjects with increasing anti-RBD IgG levels over time had a lower incidence of Omicron infection. Whether increasing humoral response at 3 months post-booster is more indicative of protection than a high initial peak remains to be confirmed in a larger cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10013501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100135012023-03-15 Increase over time of antibody levels 3 months after a booster dose as an indication of better protection against Omicron infection Bingula, Rea Chabrolles, Hélène Bonnet, Benjamin Archimbaud, Christine Brebion, Amélie Cosme, Justine Ollier, Amandine Dutheil, Frédéric Junda, Maud Mirand, Audrey Regagnon, Christel Vidal, Magali Henquell, Cécile Evrard, Bertrand Emerg Microbes Infect Coronaviruses The third, “booster”, vaccination increases the overall immune response against SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, after the initial peak at around 3 weeks post-vaccination, anti-spike antibody levels decline. Post-booster kinetics of cellular response has been less investigated and there is no documented evidence of a true boosting effect. Furthermore, multiple studies underline the less effective immune responses against Omicron, the latest variant of concern, at both humoral and cellular levels. In this letter, we analyse humoral (anti-RBD IgG levels) and cellular (IFN-γ release assay) immune response in 205 health care workers 3 weeks and 3 months after administration of an mRNA-based booster dose, either mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2. Since all subjects were SARS-CoV-2 infection-naïve, we also looked at the incidence of Omicron infection between 3 and 6 months post-booster. At both timepoints, 3x mRNA-1273 vaccination had the highest overall antibody and IFN-γ levels, followed by 3x BNT162b2 vaccination and heterologous mRNA-based regimens. Heterologous ChAdOx1–mRNA-based regimen had the lowest antibody levels while cellular response equal to that of 3x BNT162b2 vaccination and heterologous mRNA-based regimens. Our results show that both humoral and cellular responses waned at 3 months for all vaccination regimens. However, we identified three trajectories of dosage variation. Interestingly, the subgroup of subjects with increasing anti-RBD IgG levels over time had a lower incidence of Omicron infection. Whether increasing humoral response at 3 months post-booster is more indicative of protection than a high initial peak remains to be confirmed in a larger cohort. Taylor & Francis 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10013501/ /pubmed/36848040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2184176 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of Shanghai Shangyixun Cultural Communication Co., Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Coronaviruses
Bingula, Rea
Chabrolles, Hélène
Bonnet, Benjamin
Archimbaud, Christine
Brebion, Amélie
Cosme, Justine
Ollier, Amandine
Dutheil, Frédéric
Junda, Maud
Mirand, Audrey
Regagnon, Christel
Vidal, Magali
Henquell, Cécile
Evrard, Bertrand
Increase over time of antibody levels 3 months after a booster dose as an indication of better protection against Omicron infection
title Increase over time of antibody levels 3 months after a booster dose as an indication of better protection against Omicron infection
title_full Increase over time of antibody levels 3 months after a booster dose as an indication of better protection against Omicron infection
title_fullStr Increase over time of antibody levels 3 months after a booster dose as an indication of better protection against Omicron infection
title_full_unstemmed Increase over time of antibody levels 3 months after a booster dose as an indication of better protection against Omicron infection
title_short Increase over time of antibody levels 3 months after a booster dose as an indication of better protection against Omicron infection
title_sort increase over time of antibody levels 3 months after a booster dose as an indication of better protection against omicron infection
topic Coronaviruses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2184176
work_keys_str_mv AT bingularea increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT chabrolleshelene increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT bonnetbenjamin increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT archimbaudchristine increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT brebionamelie increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT cosmejustine increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT ollieramandine increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT dutheilfrederic increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT jundamaud increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT mirandaudrey increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT regagnonchristel increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT vidalmagali increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT henquellcecile increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection
AT evrardbertrand increaseovertimeofantibodylevels3monthsafteraboosterdoseasanindicationofbetterprotectionagainstomicroninfection