Cargando…
Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context
The goal of personnel selection is to find predictors that, together, maximize the explained variance in important job outcomes such as Task Performance or Work Engagement. Common predictors include Intelligence and Big Five Personality. Using Person-Organization Fit (P-O Fit) for selection purposes...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013553/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2020.1724752 |
_version_ | 1784906812067151872 |
---|---|
author | Sørlie, Henrik O. Hetland, Jørn Dysvik, Anders Fosse, Thomas H. Martinsen, Øyvind L. |
author_facet | Sørlie, Henrik O. Hetland, Jørn Dysvik, Anders Fosse, Thomas H. Martinsen, Øyvind L. |
author_sort | Sørlie, Henrik O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The goal of personnel selection is to find predictors that, together, maximize the explained variance in important job outcomes such as Task Performance or Work Engagement. Common predictors include Intelligence and Big Five Personality. Using Person-Organization Fit (P-O Fit) for selection purposes has been discussed, but, beyond Intelligence and Personality, evidence of the incremental predictive validity of P-O Fit in relation to task performance and work engagement is scarce. This study examines the practical utility of indirectly measured P-O Fit as a selection tool in a military setting. Measures of objective P-O Fit were obtained from actual applicants in a military selection setting and combined with self-report measures of Work Engagement upon organizational entry, and supervisor-rated Task Performance approximately two weeks later. P-O Fit predicted both Task Performance ([Image: see text] = .041) and Work Engagement ([Image: see text] = .038). More importantly, P-O Fit yielded incremental predictive validity in relation to both outcomes, also after controlling for intelligence and personality traits. While our initial models (including age, gender, intelligence, and personality) explained 25.1% and 5.8% of the variance in work engagement and task performance, respectively, this increased to 26.3% and 6.3%, respectively, after the inclusion of P-O Fit. Implications for practical use in selection systems are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10013553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100135532023-05-18 Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context Sørlie, Henrik O. Hetland, Jørn Dysvik, Anders Fosse, Thomas H. Martinsen, Øyvind L. Mil Psychol Article The goal of personnel selection is to find predictors that, together, maximize the explained variance in important job outcomes such as Task Performance or Work Engagement. Common predictors include Intelligence and Big Five Personality. Using Person-Organization Fit (P-O Fit) for selection purposes has been discussed, but, beyond Intelligence and Personality, evidence of the incremental predictive validity of P-O Fit in relation to task performance and work engagement is scarce. This study examines the practical utility of indirectly measured P-O Fit as a selection tool in a military setting. Measures of objective P-O Fit were obtained from actual applicants in a military selection setting and combined with self-report measures of Work Engagement upon organizational entry, and supervisor-rated Task Performance approximately two weeks later. P-O Fit predicted both Task Performance ([Image: see text] = .041) and Work Engagement ([Image: see text] = .038). More importantly, P-O Fit yielded incremental predictive validity in relation to both outcomes, also after controlling for intelligence and personality traits. While our initial models (including age, gender, intelligence, and personality) explained 25.1% and 5.8% of the variance in work engagement and task performance, respectively, this increased to 26.3% and 6.3%, respectively, after the inclusion of P-O Fit. Implications for practical use in selection systems are discussed. Routledge 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10013553/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2020.1724752 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Article Sørlie, Henrik O. Hetland, Jørn Dysvik, Anders Fosse, Thomas H. Martinsen, Øyvind L. Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context |
title | Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context |
title_full | Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context |
title_fullStr | Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context |
title_full_unstemmed | Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context |
title_short | Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context |
title_sort | person-organization fit in a military selection context |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013553/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2020.1724752 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sørliehenriko personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext AT hetlandjørn personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext AT dysvikanders personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext AT fossethomash personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext AT martinsenøyvindl personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext |