Cargando…

Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context

The goal of personnel selection is to find predictors that, together, maximize the explained variance in important job outcomes such as Task Performance or Work Engagement. Common predictors include Intelligence and Big Five Personality. Using Person-Organization Fit (P-O Fit) for selection purposes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sørlie, Henrik O., Hetland, Jørn, Dysvik, Anders, Fosse, Thomas H., Martinsen, Øyvind L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013553/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2020.1724752
_version_ 1784906812067151872
author Sørlie, Henrik O.
Hetland, Jørn
Dysvik, Anders
Fosse, Thomas H.
Martinsen, Øyvind L.
author_facet Sørlie, Henrik O.
Hetland, Jørn
Dysvik, Anders
Fosse, Thomas H.
Martinsen, Øyvind L.
author_sort Sørlie, Henrik O.
collection PubMed
description The goal of personnel selection is to find predictors that, together, maximize the explained variance in important job outcomes such as Task Performance or Work Engagement. Common predictors include Intelligence and Big Five Personality. Using Person-Organization Fit (P-O Fit) for selection purposes has been discussed, but, beyond Intelligence and Personality, evidence of the incremental predictive validity of P-O Fit in relation to task performance and work engagement is scarce. This study examines the practical utility of indirectly measured P-O Fit as a selection tool in a military setting. Measures of objective P-O Fit were obtained from actual applicants in a military selection setting and combined with self-report measures of Work Engagement upon organizational entry, and supervisor-rated Task Performance approximately two weeks later. P-O Fit predicted both Task Performance ([Image: see text] = .041) and Work Engagement ([Image: see text] = .038). More importantly, P-O Fit yielded incremental predictive validity in relation to both outcomes, also after controlling for intelligence and personality traits. While our initial models (including age, gender, intelligence, and personality) explained 25.1% and 5.8% of the variance in work engagement and task performance, respectively, this increased to 26.3% and 6.3%, respectively, after the inclusion of P-O Fit. Implications for practical use in selection systems are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10013553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100135532023-05-18 Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context Sørlie, Henrik O. Hetland, Jørn Dysvik, Anders Fosse, Thomas H. Martinsen, Øyvind L. Mil Psychol Article The goal of personnel selection is to find predictors that, together, maximize the explained variance in important job outcomes such as Task Performance or Work Engagement. Common predictors include Intelligence and Big Five Personality. Using Person-Organization Fit (P-O Fit) for selection purposes has been discussed, but, beyond Intelligence and Personality, evidence of the incremental predictive validity of P-O Fit in relation to task performance and work engagement is scarce. This study examines the practical utility of indirectly measured P-O Fit as a selection tool in a military setting. Measures of objective P-O Fit were obtained from actual applicants in a military selection setting and combined with self-report measures of Work Engagement upon organizational entry, and supervisor-rated Task Performance approximately two weeks later. P-O Fit predicted both Task Performance ([Image: see text] = .041) and Work Engagement ([Image: see text] = .038). More importantly, P-O Fit yielded incremental predictive validity in relation to both outcomes, also after controlling for intelligence and personality traits. While our initial models (including age, gender, intelligence, and personality) explained 25.1% and 5.8% of the variance in work engagement and task performance, respectively, this increased to 26.3% and 6.3%, respectively, after the inclusion of P-O Fit. Implications for practical use in selection systems are discussed. Routledge 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10013553/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2020.1724752 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Article
Sørlie, Henrik O.
Hetland, Jørn
Dysvik, Anders
Fosse, Thomas H.
Martinsen, Øyvind L.
Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context
title Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context
title_full Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context
title_fullStr Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context
title_full_unstemmed Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context
title_short Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context
title_sort person-organization fit in a military selection context
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013553/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2020.1724752
work_keys_str_mv AT sørliehenriko personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext
AT hetlandjørn personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext
AT dysvikanders personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext
AT fossethomash personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext
AT martinsenøyvindl personorganizationfitinamilitaryselectioncontext