Cargando…

Whether Assisted Intramedullary Nail Implantation Without Traction Table is as Safe and Effective as Using Traction Table of Older Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients?

PURPOSE: Despite promising clinical outcome proposals, there has been relatively little published regarding the use of traction table-assisted intramedullary nail implantation for intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study is to further summarize and evaluate published clinical studies c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Dong-Yang, Liu, Chun-Gui, Zhang, Kun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36926471
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S399608
_version_ 1784906814445322240
author Li, Dong-Yang
Liu, Chun-Gui
Zhang, Kun
author_facet Li, Dong-Yang
Liu, Chun-Gui
Zhang, Kun
author_sort Li, Dong-Yang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Despite promising clinical outcome proposals, there has been relatively little published regarding the use of traction table-assisted intramedullary nail implantation for intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study is to further summarize and evaluate published clinical studies comparing the clinical outcomes of using traction table and without traction table in the management of intertrochanteric fracture. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was systematically performed to evaluate all studies included in the literature up to May 2022. The search terms included “intertrochanteric fractures”, “hip fractures”, and “traction table” with Boolean operators “AND” and “OR”. The following information was extracted and summarized: demographic information, setup time, surgical time, amount of bleeding, fluoroscopy exposure time, reduction quality, and Harris Hip Score (HHS). RESULTS: A total of eight clinical controlled studies involving 620 patients were eligible for the review. The mean age at the time of injury was 75.3 years (traction table group 75.7 years, non-traction table group 74.9 years). The most common assisted intramedullary nail implantation method of non-traction table group included lateral decubitus position (4 studies), traction repositor, (3 studies) and manual traction (1 studies). Included studies results all support that there was no difference between the two groups in terms of reduction quality and Harris Hip Score, and the non-traction table group had an advantage in terms of setup time. However, there were still disputes in terms of surgical time, amount of bleeding and fluoroscopy exposure time. CONCLUSION: For patients with intertrochanteric fractures, assisting intramedullary nail implantation without traction table is as safe and effective as using traction table and doing so without a traction table may be more advantageous in terms of setup time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10013570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100135702023-03-15 Whether Assisted Intramedullary Nail Implantation Without Traction Table is as Safe and Effective as Using Traction Table of Older Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients? Li, Dong-Yang Liu, Chun-Gui Zhang, Kun Clin Interv Aging Review PURPOSE: Despite promising clinical outcome proposals, there has been relatively little published regarding the use of traction table-assisted intramedullary nail implantation for intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study is to further summarize and evaluate published clinical studies comparing the clinical outcomes of using traction table and without traction table in the management of intertrochanteric fracture. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was systematically performed to evaluate all studies included in the literature up to May 2022. The search terms included “intertrochanteric fractures”, “hip fractures”, and “traction table” with Boolean operators “AND” and “OR”. The following information was extracted and summarized: demographic information, setup time, surgical time, amount of bleeding, fluoroscopy exposure time, reduction quality, and Harris Hip Score (HHS). RESULTS: A total of eight clinical controlled studies involving 620 patients were eligible for the review. The mean age at the time of injury was 75.3 years (traction table group 75.7 years, non-traction table group 74.9 years). The most common assisted intramedullary nail implantation method of non-traction table group included lateral decubitus position (4 studies), traction repositor, (3 studies) and manual traction (1 studies). Included studies results all support that there was no difference between the two groups in terms of reduction quality and Harris Hip Score, and the non-traction table group had an advantage in terms of setup time. However, there were still disputes in terms of surgical time, amount of bleeding and fluoroscopy exposure time. CONCLUSION: For patients with intertrochanteric fractures, assisting intramedullary nail implantation without traction table is as safe and effective as using traction table and doing so without a traction table may be more advantageous in terms of setup time. Dove 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10013570/ /pubmed/36926471 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S399608 Text en © 2023 Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Li, Dong-Yang
Liu, Chun-Gui
Zhang, Kun
Whether Assisted Intramedullary Nail Implantation Without Traction Table is as Safe and Effective as Using Traction Table of Older Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients?
title Whether Assisted Intramedullary Nail Implantation Without Traction Table is as Safe and Effective as Using Traction Table of Older Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients?
title_full Whether Assisted Intramedullary Nail Implantation Without Traction Table is as Safe and Effective as Using Traction Table of Older Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients?
title_fullStr Whether Assisted Intramedullary Nail Implantation Without Traction Table is as Safe and Effective as Using Traction Table of Older Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients?
title_full_unstemmed Whether Assisted Intramedullary Nail Implantation Without Traction Table is as Safe and Effective as Using Traction Table of Older Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients?
title_short Whether Assisted Intramedullary Nail Implantation Without Traction Table is as Safe and Effective as Using Traction Table of Older Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients?
title_sort whether assisted intramedullary nail implantation without traction table is as safe and effective as using traction table of older intertrochanteric fracture patients?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36926471
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S399608
work_keys_str_mv AT lidongyang whetherassistedintramedullarynailimplantationwithouttractiontableisassafeandeffectiveasusingtractiontableofolderintertrochantericfracturepatients
AT liuchungui whetherassistedintramedullarynailimplantationwithouttractiontableisassafeandeffectiveasusingtractiontableofolderintertrochantericfracturepatients
AT zhangkun whetherassistedintramedullarynailimplantationwithouttractiontableisassafeandeffectiveasusingtractiontableofolderintertrochantericfracturepatients