Cargando…
Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention
Covert endogenous (voluntary) attention improves visual performance. Human neuroimaging studies suggest that the putative human homolog of macaque frontal eye fields (FEF+) is critical for this improvement, whereas early visual areas are not. Yet, correlational MRI methods do not manipulate brain fu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36853947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2219635120 |
_version_ | 1784906840344100864 |
---|---|
author | Fernández, Antonio Hanning, Nina M. Carrasco, Marisa |
author_facet | Fernández, Antonio Hanning, Nina M. Carrasco, Marisa |
author_sort | Fernández, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Covert endogenous (voluntary) attention improves visual performance. Human neuroimaging studies suggest that the putative human homolog of macaque frontal eye fields (FEF+) is critical for this improvement, whereas early visual areas are not. Yet, correlational MRI methods do not manipulate brain function. We investigated whether rFEF+ or V1/V2 plays a causal role in endogenous attention. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to alter activity in the visual cortex or rFEF+ when observers performed an orientation discrimination task while attention was manipulated. On every trial, they received double-pulse TMS at a predetermined site (stimulated region) around V1/V2 or rFEF+. Two cortically magnified gratings were presented, one in the stimulated region (contralateral to the stimulated area) and another in the symmetric (ipsilateral) nonstimulated region. Grating contrast was varied to measure contrast response functions (CRFs) for all attention and stimulation combinations. In experiment 1, the CRFs were similar at the stimulated and nonstimulated regions, indicating that early visual areas do not modulate endogenous attention during stimulus presentation. In contrast, occipital TMS eliminates exogenous (involuntary) attention effects on performance [A. Fernández, M. Carrasco,Curr. Biol. 30, 4078–4084 (2020)]. In experiment 2, rFEF+ stimulation decreased the overall attentional effect; neither benefits at the attended location nor costs at the unattended location were significant. The frequency and directionality of microsaccades mimicked this pattern: Whereas occipital stimulation did not affect microsaccades, rFEF+ stimulation caused a higher microsaccade rate directed toward the stimulated hemifield. These results provide causal evidence of the role of this frontal region for endogenous attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10013745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100137452023-08-28 Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention Fernández, Antonio Hanning, Nina M. Carrasco, Marisa Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Covert endogenous (voluntary) attention improves visual performance. Human neuroimaging studies suggest that the putative human homolog of macaque frontal eye fields (FEF+) is critical for this improvement, whereas early visual areas are not. Yet, correlational MRI methods do not manipulate brain function. We investigated whether rFEF+ or V1/V2 plays a causal role in endogenous attention. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to alter activity in the visual cortex or rFEF+ when observers performed an orientation discrimination task while attention was manipulated. On every trial, they received double-pulse TMS at a predetermined site (stimulated region) around V1/V2 or rFEF+. Two cortically magnified gratings were presented, one in the stimulated region (contralateral to the stimulated area) and another in the symmetric (ipsilateral) nonstimulated region. Grating contrast was varied to measure contrast response functions (CRFs) for all attention and stimulation combinations. In experiment 1, the CRFs were similar at the stimulated and nonstimulated regions, indicating that early visual areas do not modulate endogenous attention during stimulus presentation. In contrast, occipital TMS eliminates exogenous (involuntary) attention effects on performance [A. Fernández, M. Carrasco,Curr. Biol. 30, 4078–4084 (2020)]. In experiment 2, rFEF+ stimulation decreased the overall attentional effect; neither benefits at the attended location nor costs at the unattended location were significant. The frequency and directionality of microsaccades mimicked this pattern: Whereas occipital stimulation did not affect microsaccades, rFEF+ stimulation caused a higher microsaccade rate directed toward the stimulated hemifield. These results provide causal evidence of the role of this frontal region for endogenous attention. National Academy of Sciences 2023-02-28 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10013745/ /pubmed/36853947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2219635120 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Biological Sciences Fernández, Antonio Hanning, Nina M. Carrasco, Marisa Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention |
title | Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention |
title_full | Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention |
title_fullStr | Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention |
title_short | Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention |
title_sort | transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention |
topic | Biological Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36853947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2219635120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezantonio transcranialmagneticstimulationtofrontalbutnotoccipitalcortexdisruptsendogenousattention AT hanningninam transcranialmagneticstimulationtofrontalbutnotoccipitalcortexdisruptsendogenousattention AT carrascomarisa transcranialmagneticstimulationtofrontalbutnotoccipitalcortexdisruptsendogenousattention |