Cargando…
Defibrillation effectiveness and safety of the shock waveform used in a contemporary wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Results from animal and human studies
INTRODUCTION: The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is used to protect patients at risk for sudden cardiac arrest. We examined defibrillation efficacy and safety of a biphasic truncated exponential waveform designed for use in a contemporary WCD in three animal studies and a human study. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281340 |
_version_ | 1784906880788725760 |
---|---|
author | Gleva, Marye J. Sullivan, Joseph Crawford, Thomas C. Walcott, Greg Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika Branch, Kelley R. Doshi, Rahul N. Kivilaid, Kaisa Brennan, Kelly Rowbotham, Ron K. Gustavson, Laura M. Poole, Jeanne E. |
author_facet | Gleva, Marye J. Sullivan, Joseph Crawford, Thomas C. Walcott, Greg Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika Branch, Kelley R. Doshi, Rahul N. Kivilaid, Kaisa Brennan, Kelly Rowbotham, Ron K. Gustavson, Laura M. Poole, Jeanne E. |
author_sort | Gleva, Marye J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is used to protect patients at risk for sudden cardiac arrest. We examined defibrillation efficacy and safety of a biphasic truncated exponential waveform designed for use in a contemporary WCD in three animal studies and a human study. METHODS: Animal (swine) studies: #1: Efficacy comparison of a 170J BTE waveform (SHOCK A) to a 150J BTE waveform (SHOCK B) that approximates another commercially available waveform. Primary endpoint first shock success rate. #2: Efficacy comparison of the two waveforms at attenuated charge voltages in swine at three prespecified impedances. Primary endpoint first shock success rate. #3: Safety comparison of SHOCK A and SHOCK B in swine. Primary endpoint cardiac biomarker level changes baseline to 6 and 24 hours post-shock. Human Study: Efficacy comparison of SHOCK A to prespecified goal and safety evaluation. Primary endpoint cumulative first and second shock success rate. Safety endpoint adverse events. RESULTS: Animal Studies #1: 120 VF episodes in six swine. First shock success rates for SHOCK A and SHOCK B were 100%; SHOCK A non-inferior to SHOCK B (entire 95% CI of rate difference above -10% margin, p < .001). #2: 2,160 VF episodes in thirty-six swine. Attenuated SHOCK A was non-inferior to attenuated SHOCK B at each impedance (entire 95% CI of rate difference above -10% margin, p < .001). #3: Ten swine, five shocked five times each with SHOCK A, five shocked five times each with SHOCK B. No significant difference in troponin I (p = 0.658) or creatine phosphokinase (p = 0.855) changes from baseline between SHOCK A and SHOCK B. Human Study: Thirteen patients, 100% VF conversion rate. Mild skin irritation from adhesive defibrillation pads in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: The BTE waveform effectively and safely terminated induced VF in swine and a small sample in humans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Human study clinical trial registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04132466. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10013906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100139062023-03-15 Defibrillation effectiveness and safety of the shock waveform used in a contemporary wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Results from animal and human studies Gleva, Marye J. Sullivan, Joseph Crawford, Thomas C. Walcott, Greg Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika Branch, Kelley R. Doshi, Rahul N. Kivilaid, Kaisa Brennan, Kelly Rowbotham, Ron K. Gustavson, Laura M. Poole, Jeanne E. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is used to protect patients at risk for sudden cardiac arrest. We examined defibrillation efficacy and safety of a biphasic truncated exponential waveform designed for use in a contemporary WCD in three animal studies and a human study. METHODS: Animal (swine) studies: #1: Efficacy comparison of a 170J BTE waveform (SHOCK A) to a 150J BTE waveform (SHOCK B) that approximates another commercially available waveform. Primary endpoint first shock success rate. #2: Efficacy comparison of the two waveforms at attenuated charge voltages in swine at three prespecified impedances. Primary endpoint first shock success rate. #3: Safety comparison of SHOCK A and SHOCK B in swine. Primary endpoint cardiac biomarker level changes baseline to 6 and 24 hours post-shock. Human Study: Efficacy comparison of SHOCK A to prespecified goal and safety evaluation. Primary endpoint cumulative first and second shock success rate. Safety endpoint adverse events. RESULTS: Animal Studies #1: 120 VF episodes in six swine. First shock success rates for SHOCK A and SHOCK B were 100%; SHOCK A non-inferior to SHOCK B (entire 95% CI of rate difference above -10% margin, p < .001). #2: 2,160 VF episodes in thirty-six swine. Attenuated SHOCK A was non-inferior to attenuated SHOCK B at each impedance (entire 95% CI of rate difference above -10% margin, p < .001). #3: Ten swine, five shocked five times each with SHOCK A, five shocked five times each with SHOCK B. No significant difference in troponin I (p = 0.658) or creatine phosphokinase (p = 0.855) changes from baseline between SHOCK A and SHOCK B. Human Study: Thirteen patients, 100% VF conversion rate. Mild skin irritation from adhesive defibrillation pads in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: The BTE waveform effectively and safely terminated induced VF in swine and a small sample in humans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Human study clinical trial registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04132466. Public Library of Science 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10013906/ /pubmed/36917566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281340 Text en © 2023 Gleva et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gleva, Marye J. Sullivan, Joseph Crawford, Thomas C. Walcott, Greg Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika Branch, Kelley R. Doshi, Rahul N. Kivilaid, Kaisa Brennan, Kelly Rowbotham, Ron K. Gustavson, Laura M. Poole, Jeanne E. Defibrillation effectiveness and safety of the shock waveform used in a contemporary wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Results from animal and human studies |
title | Defibrillation effectiveness and safety of the shock waveform used in a contemporary wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Results from animal and human studies |
title_full | Defibrillation effectiveness and safety of the shock waveform used in a contemporary wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Results from animal and human studies |
title_fullStr | Defibrillation effectiveness and safety of the shock waveform used in a contemporary wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Results from animal and human studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Defibrillation effectiveness and safety of the shock waveform used in a contemporary wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Results from animal and human studies |
title_short | Defibrillation effectiveness and safety of the shock waveform used in a contemporary wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Results from animal and human studies |
title_sort | defibrillation effectiveness and safety of the shock waveform used in a contemporary wearable cardioverter defibrillator: results from animal and human studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281340 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glevamaryej defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT sullivanjoseph defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT crawfordthomasc defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT walcottgreg defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT birgersdottergreenulrika defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT branchkelleyr defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT doshirahuln defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT kivilaidkaisa defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT brennankelly defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT rowbothamronk defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT gustavsonlauram defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies AT poolejeannee defibrillationeffectivenessandsafetyoftheshockwaveformusedinacontemporarywearablecardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromanimalandhumanstudies |