Cargando…
Machine Learning-Based Urine Peptidome Analysis to Predict and Understand Mechanisms of Progression to Kidney Failure
INTRODUCTION: The identification of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at risk of progressing to kidney failure (KF) is important for clinical decision-making. In this study we assesed whether urinary peptidome (UP) analysis may help classify patients with CKD and improve KF risk prediction....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2022.11.023 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: The identification of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at risk of progressing to kidney failure (KF) is important for clinical decision-making. In this study we assesed whether urinary peptidome (UP) analysis may help classify patients with CKD and improve KF risk prediction. METHODS: The UP was analyzed using capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry in a case-cohort sample of 1000 patients with CKD stage G3 to G5 from the French CKD-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) cohort. We used unsupervised and supervised machine learning to classify patients into homogenous UP clusters and to predict 3-year KF risk with UP, respectively. The predictive performance of UP was compared with the KF risk equation (KFRE), and evaluated in an external cohort of 326 patients. RESULTS: More than 1000 peptides classified patients into 3 clusters with different CKD severities and etiologies at baseline. Peptides with the highest discriminative power for clustering were fragments of proteins involved in inflammation and fibrosis, highlighting those derived from α-1-antitrypsin, a major acute phase protein with anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic properties, as the most significant. We then identified a set of 90 urinary peptides that predicted KF with a c-index of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81−0.85) in the case-cohort and 0.89 (0.83−0.94) in the external cohort, which were close to that estimated with the KFRE (0.85 [0.83−0.87]). Combination of UP with KFRE variables did not further improve prediction. CONCLUSION: This study shows the potential of UP analysis to uncover new pathophysiological CKD progression pathways and to predict KF risk with a performance equal to that of the KFRE. |
---|